Actually those are pretty good statements, is a general overview:
1."the assessed intelligence has established beyond doubt … that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons"
The Prime Minister's foreword to the dossier on Iraq, 24 September 2002
After over three months of inspections, the UN weapons inspectors reported on 6 March that "No proscribed activities, or the result of such
activities from the period of 1998-2002 have, so far, been detected through inspections." If Britain had any intelligence to indicate that Iraq had
continued to produce prohibited weapons, where was it when it could have been checked out by inspectors?
2."the assessed intelligence has established beyond doubt .. that he [Saddam Hussein] continues in his efforts to develop nuclear weapons"
The Prime Minister's foreword to the dossier on Iraq, 24 September 2002
IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei told the Security Council on 7 March 2003 that "After three months of intrusive inspections, we have to date
found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapons programme in Iraq."
3."We know that this man has got weapons of mass destruction. That sounds like a slightly abstract phrase, but what we are talking about is chemical
weapons, biological weapons, viruses, bacilli and anthrax—10,000 litres of anthrax—that he has. We know that he has it, Dr. Blix points that out and
he has failed to account for that."
Jack Straw to the House of Commons, 17 March 2003
The UN has never claimed that Iraq "has" these weapons, but that Iraq had certain amounts of weapons before 1991 or materials to build these
weapons, and it hasn't adequately explained what happened to them. As Hans Blix said in September 2002, "this is not the same as saying there are
weapons of mass destruction. If I had solid evidence that Iraq retained weapons of mass destruction or were constructing such weapons I would take it
to the Security Council."
4."There is no doubt about the chemical programme, the biological programme, indeed the nuclear weapons programme. All that is well documented by the
United Nations."
Tony Blair, 30 May 2003
The UN has not found any evidence of any on-going programmes since the mid-1990s. Dr Blix said on 23 May that "I am obviously very interested in the
question of whether or not there were weapons of mass destruction and I am beginning to suspect there possibly were not."
Rest of the Lies:
middleeastreference.org.uk...
Or
traprockpeace.org...