5 Minutes of Bush Doing Nothing, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 22-7-2003 @ 01:45 AM by Tyriffic
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Originally posted by SeekerofOK MA and MK,
I was home watching the Good Morning America, and the show was interupted when the first plane hit. They showed the footage of it and yes, it was after it hit....hence everyone thinking the plane had just went off coarse and such, and hence me saying "damn". While watching the same program, they had went back to reporting on the first plane hit when the I saw, literally, the second plane hit the second tower..........thats what I will never forget....!!

ALways someone has to be skeptical of the truth and then someone, you MA, then chimes in with "you know how people like to weave tales, etc."
I would have expected at least a bit less skepticism than I was given.......
But hey......thats a common place theme around here anyhoo!!

regards
seekerof

[Edited on 21-7-2003 by Seekerof]

[Edited on 21-7-2003 by Seekerof]

[Edited on 21-7-2003 by Seekerof]



Yes, I watched the events unfold as well, on three different cable channels. It's why I don't believe you.

But I am not trying to destroy your credibility. It's not your fault. And it would really be too much effort for you to buy the video of the morning show and see and hear again to confirm what you actually saw and heard.


I looked in my Cherios today and saw a Republican conspiracy......

I saw the burning tower, then live, I saw the second plane glide into the other tower. No one on the news had anything to say for several seconds, adding to the surreal factor.

I am certain that GWB, as he sat reciting Capt. Kangaroo to little kids, was thinking: " Good job fellas!! Way to get my agenda rollin'"

SILLINESS
Schizophrenia is treatable.

[Edited on 22-7-2003 by Tyriffic]



reply posted on 22-7-2003 @ 08:31 AM by Peace
William, how on earth can you have a "Political Scandalism" board and attempt to limit the number of anti Bush threads or users?



What is the problem?
He is not off the subject, why do you have a problem with him expressing his opinion?
It is relevant to this board whether you, I or anybody else agrees with it or not.



"Note to anyone posting on the 'Political Scandalism' board - Even though George W Bush is the most corrupt President in decades, anyone caught insulting him more than once a day on this board will be subject to insults themselves"


Personally i think more criticism of the whole Bush administration is needed, after all the President may be an arse, but he just does what he is told.

Ashcroft doesn't get enough criticism, neither does Cheney, and Wolfowitz was known in Washington as a crazy loonatic until he became Rumsfeld's deputy.
It is the team that Bush has assembled around him that i am critical of, i actually prefer Bush to Cheney/Rumsfeld/Ashcroft/Wolfowitz.


www.buzzflash.com...

"By Perri Green

POTUS SOTU:

President Bush says he's "moved on" and that the "case is closed" with regards to those "sixteen words" in his SOTU.

Fine. What about these 71 from the same speech?

"Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. U.S. intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents. We have also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas."

To date, not a single UAV has been found, or drop of CBWs, or any munitions capable of delivering said weapons.

Is the CIA responsible for those words as well?

What about these 26, also from the same speech?

"Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaida."

To date, not a shred of evidence connecting Hussein with Al Qaida or any other known terrorist organizations (besides certain Palestinian groups who represent no direct threat to the US) have been revealed.

And then there are these 20:

"Our intelligence sources tell us that he (Saddam) has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production."

The IAEA as well as dozens of leading scientists declared said tubes unsuitable for nuclear weapons production -- months before the war.

The CIA has assumed tepid responsibility for not insisting Bush remove the sixteen words about British evidence of Hussein's alleged attempts to purchase uranium from Africa. (Since when does the US go to war on the basis of British intel anyway?)

Fine.

Bush, however, must take responsibility for the rest his words, all 117 of which were lies. Lies that have resulted in the deaths of over two hundred American GIs, the wounding of at least 1,046, and the senseless killing of more than six thousand innocent Iraqi civilians. If this doesn't qualify as impeachable (and even indictable) high crimes and misdemeanors, then nothing does.

Perri Green
Los Angeles, CA

A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY"
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Now a witness to Breitbart\'s death vanishes
  Posted 17 days ago with 6 member flags
Cuba: Judge Rejects Efforts to Open CIA Volume on Bay of Pigs
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
US Official Detained for Donation to Al Qaeda - Anonymous Involved
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

OMG!!! Is this for real??
  Relationships: 15 hours ago, 78 replies
RONY 2012
  US Political Madness: 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Why do UFO's need lights?
  Aliens and UFOs: 17 hours ago, 48 replies
We are (nearly) all Believers!!!
  Aliens and UFOs: 15 hours ago, 35 replies