William, how on earth can you have a "Political Scandalism" board and attempt to limit the number of anti Bush threads or users?




What is the problem?
He is not off the subject, why do you have a problem with him expressing his opinion?
It is relevant to this board whether you, I or anybody else agrees with it or not.
"Note to anyone posting on the 'Political Scandalism' board - Even though George W Bush is the most corrupt President in decades, anyone caught
insulting him more than once a day on this board will be subject to insults themselves"
Personally i think more criticism of the whole Bush administration is needed, after all the President may be an arse, but he just does what he is
told.
Ashcroft doesn't get enough criticism, neither does Cheney, and Wolfowitz was known in Washington as a crazy loonatic until he became Rumsfeld's
deputy.
It is the team that Bush has assembled around him that i am critical of, i actually prefer Bush to Cheney/Rumsfeld/Ashcroft/Wolfowitz.
www.buzzflash.com...
"By Perri Green
POTUS SOTU:
President Bush says he's "moved on" and that the "case is closed" with regards to those "sixteen words" in his SOTU.
Fine. What about these 71 from the same speech?
"Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. U.S.
intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents. We have also discovered through
intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across
broad areas."
To date, not a single UAV has been found, or drop of CBWs, or any munitions capable of delivering said weapons.
Is the CIA responsible for those words as well?
What about these 26, also from the same speech?
"Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects
terrorists, including members of Al Qaida."
To date, not a shred of evidence connecting Hussein with Al Qaida or any other known terrorist organizations (besides certain Palestinian groups who
represent no direct threat to the US) have been revealed.
And then there are these 20:
"Our intelligence sources tell us that he (Saddam) has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production."
The IAEA as well as dozens of leading scientists declared said tubes unsuitable for nuclear weapons production -- months before the war.
The CIA has assumed tepid responsibility for not insisting Bush remove the sixteen words about British evidence of Hussein's alleged attempts to
purchase uranium from Africa. (Since when does the US go to war on the basis of British intel anyway?)
Fine.
Bush, however, must take responsibility for the rest his words, all 117 of which were lies. Lies that have resulted in the deaths of over two hundred
American GIs, the wounding of at least 1,046, and the senseless killing of more than six thousand innocent Iraqi civilians. If this doesn't qualify
as impeachable (and even indictable) high crimes and misdemeanors, then nothing does.
Perri Green
Los Angeles, CA
A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY"