OP/ED: Jihad Jane teaches Political Science, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 6-4-2005 @ 09:31 PM by HowardRoark
Jihad Jane teaches Political Science, Pol 495, that is. Professor Jane T. Christensen of North Carolina Wesleyan College, drags the term science to new lows in her class: (POL 495) 911 The Road to Tyranny.


In this class you get to learn all about how the break down of the American upper educational system. No, actually, the professor will tell you that 9/11 was a Bush conspiracy, citing such stellar sources of information such as William Cooper, Alex Jones, and Jeff Rense.

The course description and suggested reading list would make many members of ATS proud, but will cause everyone else cringe and shudder at the total lack of objectivity and obvious extreme left wing bias.




faculty.ncwc.edu
The events of September 11, 2001, indisputably changed the course of American politics and history. This course is offered so students may examine various events and policies leading to 911. In particular, this course will focus largely on the specific destruction in lower Manhattan and the Pentagon. We will examine the official story and analyze it critically. We will consider alternative explanations of what occurrred as well. 911 was a catalyst for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as the attack on civil liberties in the United States. We will examine each of these with a critical eye. The goal of this course is to arrive at a solid understanding of how 911 has shaped our political future and to promote critical analysis by students of this catastrophic event and its aftermath.

This course is outside the scope of traditional "political science" in many ways. First it is "unscientific" in that it relies much on eyewitness accounts and speculation. Secondly, there is not yet a solid literature on the September 11 "attacks" or on the war on terrorism. This literature is emerging, particularly on the latter. Thirdly, this course will rely somewhat extensively on alternative news media accounts and a variety of films and videos in lieu of literature.


Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


Note the emphasis on the fact that this class is "unscientific." At least she is honest about that. I personally think that any college professor that uses Jeff Rense and Alex Jones as source material is highly suspect as to the quality of her scholarship.

If, by any chance you think that she will treat the material from those sources with a healthy dose of skepticism, I have to direct you to her personal web site, with it's picture of her in black garb, and a ski mask while holding an M-16.

Other links on her page include anti-Semitic rants and links to al jazera, and High Times web sites.

While I could see the point in assembling those links in an effort to provide access to various viewpoints, that is not the case here. This professor is clearly biased to the point where she is incapable of properly teaching requisite course material.

Related News Links:
www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com
www.dradams.org

[edit on 6-4-2005 by HowardRoark]

[edit on 6-4-2005 by HowardRoark]

[edit on 6-4-2005 by HowardRoark]

[edit on 6-4-2005 by HowardRoark]


reply posted on 6-4-2005 @ 10:30 PM by JoeDoaks
Pretty disturbing stuff. Political Science? The reading list reads more like a guide to anti-government activism.

Policital Science
Students are encouraged to develop critical thinking and writing skills in analyzing political issues and ideas. Students are offered courses in the American Political System, State and Local Government, Political Parties, the Presidency, Big Business and American Politics, Constitutional Law, and Media and Politics. Independent studies are available to students seeking to explore a particular topic of interest. These courses are designed to expose the student to various perspectives and theories of American politics and to prepare the student with critical thinking skills necessary for informed citizenship. In addition, quantitative reasoning is considered an indispensable tool for political science research. Students are offered courses in statistics, research methods, and computer applications.

Reminds me of the 70's. Political science taught everything but democracy.

Make me wonder how many tax dollar$ go to Wesleyan (North Carolina) to support a department with one isntructor that clearly buys into every conspiracy theory in existence.

Surprisiing that the Onion is not a listed 'primary source.'
.

.


reply posted on 6-4-2005 @ 10:33 PM by stumason
Hmm....The opening paragraph is a little bias don't you think?



reply posted on 6-4-2005 @ 10:37 PM by HowardRoark
The Final Exam for one of her courses

Instructions: Write essays on each of the following 4 questions (25 points each). Your answers should be at least one page each, no less. You will be graded on your writing and organizational skills as well as your ability to bring the readings into your discussion. This test is designed to see how well you have thought about the materials we have read and discussed and your ability to discuss these materials after you have reflected on them.

1. How has the war on terrorism contributed to the powers of the Bush presidency? (Discuss at least 4 ways).



2. Discuss the sweeping attack on democratic rights under the Bush administration and what this means for the future of democratic government in America.



3. Whose interests are served by the foreign and domestic policies of the Bush administration?



4. Describe and discuss the role of the Bush advisors. Who are they? What is their agenda? And how is it being carried out?


A little biased on her part, don't you think? I wonder what kind of grade you would get if you disagreed with her political viewpoint?


reply posted on 7-4-2005 @ 12:54 PM by HowardRoark
But isn't her course material up to the University?


Well it would normally be up to the department head, but since she in the only faculty member in the Political Science Department, I have no idea who, if anyone would validate her course materials.

Also in reference to the test, it is not a test on what is your ideology; It is a test on the material covered in class. The teacher taught the material that was covered in the exam.


Then this is an incredibly bad teacher. This is a senior level course. The questions on that test as slanted so that there is only one right answer, parrot back the teacher’s viewpoint.

That is simply not acceptable for a senior levels course. She should be teaching critical thinking skills and then let the students use those skills to independently evaluate the data and come up with their own conclusions. There is no way you can do that with those questions.

If you decided to be a jack and argue with her through your exam that's your choice.


No, it is your obligation to apply critical thinking skills to the materials presented. If you do not come to the same conclusion as the professor, then it is your duty to present those conclusions as such. It is the professor’s duty to evaluate your application of those skills, irregardless of whether she agrees with them. That is what college level learning is about

Somehow, based on those test questions and that teacher’s home page, I doubt that would be the case. I doubt that anyone who disagreed with her position would receive a passing grade. This is political science, not physical science. There are no absolute answers.

There is a time to fight and fail or bs and make an A.

And there is a time to complain to the administration that your money is been wasted in classes that fail to teach fundamental skills at the expense of a teacher’s personal political agenda.

This isn't high school, kids.


Nope, it’s a 400 level college class. I would expect a greater level of teaching competence.


Do what you need to get ahead.


Perhaps you need to take an ethics course, yourself.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 2 days ago with 80 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 3 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 15 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 2 days ago with 48 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 9 days ago with 37 member flags