Planet X / Niburu - Just The Facts., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 31-8-2002 @ 10:00 AM by Byrd
Actually, the proof that it's sheer nonsense is simple:

Archaeologists agree that the only planets the Sumerians knew about were the ones visible to the naked eye: Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn.
www.ramtops.demon.co.uk...

But the BEST page about this is on BADASTRONOMY.COM. Phil says:

Introduction
Doomsayers seem to pop up every few years. Last time, it was the alignment of the planets that somehow managed not to destroy the Earth in May 2000. Now, we have Planet X. A few people are claiming that a heretofore unknown planet in our solar system is on a very long, elliptical orbit. In May 2003, it will pass close enough to the Earth to affect it in some way, causing it to flip over (what many call a "pole shift") and spur many other huge disasters. The end result will be the deaths of many billions of people. There are a large number of web pages, chat rooms and books about Planet X and its horrible affects on the Earth. So the question is, does this planet exist, and will it come by in May 2003 and cause all this horror?
No, and no.

As much as I know anything in science, I know that there is no Planet X as described by this latest crop of Chicken Littles.

www.badastronomy.com...


To summarize a few of his points:

1) This is supposed to be a "brown dwarf" star. These things are stars and they do glow brightly enough to be seen by some of our telescopes. If there was a brown dwarf ANYwhere near our solar system, it would be the second or third brightest object in our solar system... a little dimmer than the moon.

This isn't something that could be missed by your average stargazer... or even Joe Dunce of Whappahappahoola. Heck, as bad as my eyes are, I could spot the thing at night without my glasses. You could see it in the daytime.

2) If you use the goodole Kepler formulas (or any formula for orbital velocity and periodicity, you'll find that in order to make the predictions come true about the planet being close to Earth in 2003, that by now it would have to be inside the solar system, somewhere between Neptune and Jupiter.

(here's the math page on it: www.badastronomy.com... )

Now, that's big enough and close enough that you could spot the thing with the naked eye. Amateur astronomy is a popular hobby.

Howcome no amateur astronomer ANYwhere has started yelling, "HEY!!! GREATBIGHORKIN' PLANET OUT THERE BETWEEN JUPITER AND NEPTUNE!!!" The things' bigger that Jupiter's moons... and we can see those easily with binoculars and telescopes (even cheap ones.)

They have found minor objects 1/3 the size of Pluto in orbit BEYOND Pluto. No planet X, though.

(check out "Ask The Astronomer": itss.raytheon.com...


...and on and on.

In short, if the thing really did exist and even if there was a HUGE coverup... by now every person on the Earth with vision better than 20/1000 (uncorrected) would be able to SEE the thing.

Day OR night.

The "planet-sized invisibility field" won't work... we'd see gravitational distortion of light around the planet as well as some other phenomina rather easily spotted by the average person.


reply posted on 26-10-2002 @ 10:49 AM by Natterari
www.darkstar1.co.uk...

This is a good friend off mine and this is his webby on the topic .I though some might like to read it due the topic off this post.


reply posted on 26-12-2002 @ 08:12 PM by William One Sac
I think these people must have found the craziest person alive to do this interview. Anywho, the person being interviewed is adamant that the planet x will swing by in May. Not too long of a wait.

www.stuff.co.nz...


LOL! From that article:
Then, Far North man Dale Patterson told Truth he had received a telepathic message from aliens.

The message warned they might destroy humans to save our planet if we did not become more peaceful.

Bre says that's nonsense.

Byrd, maybe the planet is made of asphalt and thats why no one can see it? Also, I believe I read on Steadmans site that he feels the planet is approaching us towards our southern pole, and as such may be being over looked. Is Sitchin still saying a May 2003 arrival? Or is he banking on the Mayans "end of time" being the correct date, now that there is no evidence of a large body coming near our solar system in 4 months. I am guessing that even if we couldnt see planet x, its gravity would be measurable in its effect on this planet.




[Edited on 12-27-2002 by William One Sac]

[Edited on 12-27-2002 by William One Sac]


reply posted on 26-12-2002 @ 08:33 PM by William One Sac
www.sitchin.com...

If you have a high speed modem you can view sitchins homepage [/wry sarcasm] There is no mention of Nibiru at all, rather he seems to be focusing his atgtention on a nuclear war in the Sinai Peninsula 3,600 years ago. I am guessing that means he has retracted his 5/2003 arrival date.


reply posted on 20-2-2005 @ 01:07 PM by BaastetNoir
[img]
[/img]


This was the beggining of the 12th Planet, a Sumerian artifact...Do a search on LEMSHAY

I personaly dont see what the big deal if there IS a 12th Planet ..Good ...more neighbours...


www.satansrapture.com...



reply posted on 20-2-2005 @ 01:34 PM by DavidOBE
Originally posted by BaastetNoir
[img]
[/img]


This was the beggining of the 12th Planet, a Sumerian artifact...Do a search on LEMSHAY

I personaly dont see what the big deal if there IS a 12th Planet ..Good ...more neighbours...


www.satansrapture.com...


The orbit of Planet X is said to be eliptical and not in circle like our planet. If it really exist, it can cause serious dammage to earth when it pass near us.


reply posted on 21-2-2005 @ 10:16 PM by jprophet420
i have physically seen with my own eyes the sumerian solar sytem model, and it had 10 planets on it, sun and moon.

although i cannot read sumerian, it was pretty obvious that there was a 10th planet.

there is no proof but plenty of evidence.

i have no opinion on aliens involved in this, only that there is evidence of a 10th planet dating back to 1916 when lowel founs that the orbits of the outer planets were being manipulated.
my thread
they 'debunked the # out of it' already, but it was becasue i didnt list my sources. i didnt make this thread for ats so i didnt really care at the time, and also i had hundreds of sources and only quoted the best of the best.

feel free to research anything i have in there, all i used was a google search, except for about 3 hours of fil i have seen on the history/discovery channel.


reply posted on 22-2-2005 @ 12:41 PM by kyateLaBoca
Actually there is something out there. Go to www.sitchin.com...

And scroll down and read "The Case of the French Astronomer." The french astronomer put his article in the Feb 2003 edition of Science and Vie, stating that their is another planet but it is "mars" like in size, and has a 4000 year orbit. Sitchin says P-X has a 3600 year orbit.

The only problem with this is that he claims it is "mars" like. Could it be some form of a dwarf? If not then maybe its a planetoid, comet, or whatever you want it to be


So bottom line...The french have discovered something with a 4000 year orbit, but we dont exactly know what it is.

[edit on 22-2-2005 by kyateLaBoca]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 13 days ago with 86 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 7 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 16 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 8 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 13 days ago with 57 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

OMG!!! Is this for real??
  Relationships: 15 hours ago, 78 replies
RONY 2012
  US Political Madness: 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Why do UFO's need lights?
  Aliens and UFOs: 17 hours ago, 48 replies
We are (nearly) all Believers!!!
  Aliens and UFOs: 15 hours ago, 35 replies