Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
Why, you won't even need a foreign interest to take over the country.
The citizens of this country are giving America to the American government.
If you want to get realistic about this, you have to realize that foreign interests already have
taken over this country. The American Federal
Government sold out our nation & its economic future to foreign bank interests. On the day the Federal Reserve Act was signed into reality, our
future, our economy, our right to own property was taken from us.
Take this quote from the U.S. Constitution:
(The section which describes Powers given to Congress)
Clause 5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures
Now take a look at the corporate banking interests that own & operate
the Federal Reserve...It's reads like a "Who's Who" list of foreign
banks. The US Government & its citizens aren't even allowed to buy stock in the Federal Reserve, it is not
under control of Congress & the
American People have no say as to how it's to be run, whether by Representation or otherwise.
The very name
, "Federal Reserve", is a lie...It is not Federally controlled, is not a Federal Agency of any kind & reserves less than 10% in
value than the currency that they are allowed to have "coined".
Our Founding Fathers had already seen the dangers that banks pose to entire nations...They saw it happen in their own Homelands & determined not to
let it happen in their new home. Yet, the American People were kept ignorant & control by banks slowly crept in. Even as soon in our history as
Abraham Lincoln, we were warned about this danger yet again: "I have the Confederate Army in front of me & the banks behind me. Of the two, the banks
are more dangerous."
Considering the rumors, accusations & heresay surrounding the events of 9/11 (& how Silverstein's actions prior to 9/11 are related to money &
insurance) & also considering how much this country runs by the will of the banks (Corporations, the Government & nearly each & every citizen are
upon banks to an unprecidented degree), who's to say that this whole mess wasn't initially engineered by the banks? They could have
seen great profits on interest charged for the reconstruction efforts, if nothing else.
In my own personal opinion, making use of credit cards has just been the last straw on the camel's back (so to speak) when it came to the financial
downfall of this country...Right down to the level of each individual citizen. How many people have seen total finacial ruin on a personal basis since
the advent of credit cards?
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I don't believe that the U.S. government had anything to do with 9/11 -- but I posted similar thoughts in another thread thread that people could say
the conspiracy theories are true (even though they are not) to bring on the NWO.
Perhaps...Perhaps not. But it's a given fact that nearly every aspect of commercial, industrial, political & social events are originated by some
kind of conspiracy: A good example is how the pharmaceutical companies have conspired with (or against) the FDA to keep people taking expensive drugs
their whole lives to merely treat
a problem instead of actually providing cures
that actually exist. All for the sake of their own
increasing & perpetual profit margins, of course. They've made it illegal for health care professionals to promote herbally-based cures & remedies
for good health. Such herbal remedies do
cure common ailments, but those companies can't make a profit from naturally-occuring substances as
much as laboratory-based drugs.
Originally posted by Apoc
I will not blindly believe that some businessman hatched a plot to hijack 4 airplanes crashing one into the Pentagon and crashing the other into a
field and killing thousands of people as ruse to demolish his own buildings for some financial gain. Sorry that is too much of a stretch without hard
This makes more sense than a lot of observations I've seen posted in these forums...However, considering his "foresight" to have "terrorist
coverage" on his insurance, Silverstein probably didn't engineer
the attacks, but you also have to consider the fact that he's a very
well-connected buisinessman & he likely had prior knowledge
, even if he had no actual involvement.
Originally posted by Sunofone
gosh you know what your right! i cant believe it - ive been so foolish- to think that something like "financial gain" could influence anyone is
downright absurd-thanks for showing me the err of my way- im sure bin laden was just sending us arrogant amerikan infadels a message of what will
happen to us for even thinking about running an oil pipeline through his country-sure we know better than to mess with goat herders
Correct me if I'm wrong, but do I detect a note of sarcasm in this reply?
Originally posted by xmotex
...on the other hand it wouldn't suprise me much if there was some foreknowledge on the part of the administration. These people are a gang of
vicious thugs who care for nothing but their own wealth and power, much as their supporters are eerily similar to the brownshirts of 1930's Germany.
So the "Reichstag Fire" analogy comes to mind, especially given PNAC's statement that they needed a "new Pearl Harbor" to get their agenda
Do you find it to be "strange coincidence" that events so similar to Nazi manipulation of the German people also happen in the US...Especially since
everyone knows how USSR & USA had "confiscated" Germany's top Nazi personel after WW 2? Nah, it must
be nothing more than coincidence,
Originally posted by xmotex
Personally I think Bush's supporters would still back him regardless of any degree of evidence regarding his foreknowledge of/involvement in the 9-11
attacks, they are quasi-fascist by nature, criticizing authority is essentially treasonous to them, they wouldn't dare question Bush and his cronies.
Okay, now take a look at the definition of "Treason" as it applies to the Constitution:
Clause 1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and
Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
If any of these accusations/rumors are true, then anyone involved with the planning, execution & cover-up of the actual facts would face charges of
Treason. Notice that this definition does not
specify attacks on the US Government as Treason...Therefore a civil war to oust the current
government would not be considered Treason, if the Constitution is upheld during such an event.
As a side note, the Constitution guarantees The People to have a Republic form of government...How long has it been since the US Government was even
to a Republic form of government?
All in all, I don't think that the truth about 9/11 would start a civil war...Until the public becomes aware of how much that "conspiratorial
groups" actually determine how little truth we actually see & how much we've been manipulated by "society's elite" for so long. However, such
apathetic attitude by the public may gradually change as we delve further into this Information Age.