It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm certain that rocket fuel fires and debris caused this skyscraper to conveniently implode.
At this point, I will never trust NIST with their consistant morphing of WTC 9/11 conclussions.
First we were told jet fuel was hot enough to melt steel for the first time in history = That was disproven.
Then we were fed more lies, that a 'pancake effect' crushed one floor after another which brought down the buildings = That was disproven.
Now NIST claims inadequate fireproofing, if adhered firmly to columns and floors, would have saved the building from collapsing = Soon to be disproven.
I don't get it, how is this acceptable to you? How many sequential lies by NIST are we to accept until we revolt? When the fireproofing theory is disproven, will you play ignorant accepting yet another fabricated lie as the truth?
Exactly, what rocket fuel? I'm dying to hear NIST explain how WTC 7 conveniently imploded from a few office fires caused by...
Rocket fuel right?
No no.. NIST will claim debris from WTC 1&2 penetrated WTC7 to it's inner core causing the structural integrity to implode. Riiiiight