It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shadowflux
For instance the classic quantum experiment of how one electron acts the same as a whole bunch of electrons when shot through little slits onto phot paper. Well, one of the theories in this book stated that the single electron took every one of the infinite routes possible before arriving at the exact same spot we'd expect it to be in. If you can't see how rediculous that statement is I'm not going to explain it.
As for black holes not existing, good! I'd love to see these scientists try to squirm around that fact to keep their funding
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
"That image is a representation of an accretiation disk. This disk of super hot matter that whirls around a black hole as it devours matter that is sucked beyond the event horizon.
We have seen and detected accretiation disks and also matter Jets that spew from the poles of this type of phenomenon but we have and never will be able to detect directly a Black Hole..."
Is that the same thing as an "accretion disk"?
Originally posted by Neon Haze
What could a Black hole be???
Well I believe that a black hole is in fact an object travelling faster than the speed of light. This is why it is so heavy and this is also why we cannot see it directly...
Originally posted by Neon Haze
however, what E=MC2 really means is that the faster you go the more mass you have and so as you reach the speed of light you would come to a point where you are so Heavy that you would need all the energy of the universe to push you ever faster.
Now that said...
What could a Black hole be???
Well I believe that a black hole is in fact an object travelling faster than the speed of light. This is why it is so heavy and this is also why we cannot see it directly...
What amazes me is that I can understand that and I am just ordinary Prof. of Physics then why is it not accepted in the scientific community??
Originally posted by Neon Haze....And precisely the kind of knowledge share I would like to be taken up by all!!!
Originally posted by Aelita
Originally posted by Neon Haze
however, what E=MC2 really means is that the faster you go the more mass you have and so as you reach the speed of light you would come to a point where you are so Heavy that you would need all the energy of the universe to push you ever faster.
Now that said...
What could a Black hole be???
Well I believe that a black hole is in fact an object travelling faster than the speed of light. This is why it is so heavy and this is also why we cannot see it directly...
What amazes me is that I can understand that and I am just ordinary Prof. of Physics then why is it not accepted in the scientific community??
Neon, do you care to explain this in a bit more detail. I don't see how the E=mc2 explains anything in the context you presented.
Also, I'm not aware of any evidence that an object being accelerated all of a sudden falls into a different state, FTL.
Black holes, in all likelihood, are indeed remnants of stars. According to your theory, where exactly are they moving?