I don't know if the OP expected things to go the way they have in here. I mean, the original question was about how high-IQ individuals think. Since
99% percent of the population wouldn't know from firsthand experience, then I think he would have expected them to speculate; not self-report
fictitious scores. As for the post before your last post, I don't know if they realize that the only test capable of reaching such a score without
hitting a ceiling is the Stanford-Binet Form LM:
www.hoagiesgifted.com...
www.cps.nova.edu...
www.hoagiesgifted.org...
The SBLM is used almost exclusively to better characterize individuals who max out (hit the ceilings on) other more commonly used IQ tests. This means
that if someone was tested only once, it is highly unlikely that the SBLM was used. Most definitely, a tool with lower ceilings (incapable of reaching
such high scores) was employed instead. So, those of you who claim exceedingly high scores because "of AN IQ TEST" you took at some point in your
lives, you've just been "outed"! 
|
Double-posted & removed.
[edit on 5-4-2009 by X-tal_Phusion]
|
