Hello, Liquid, welcome to ATS.
From your points, I'm guessing you've been here for a while, but before I get into a formal reply, I figured I'd pass along a little courtesy note.
It's kinda considered rude to bump one's own posts unless there is new content to add.
That said, you raise a very interesting topic:
Originally posted by LiquidationOfDiscrepancy
Do you think there is a fine line between insanity and genius?
My father once explained a theory behind this to me. Without wanting to sound arrogant, I come from a long line of geniuses. I make no claim to be one
myself, though I do try to make use of the meager gifts I was given. Compared to my forefathers, though, I'm a moron. For the previous three
generations, we had "Mad Scientists" in the family. Literally. And all of them worked for the government. Perhaps it is what they were exposed to,
or perhaps they were that way before they were hired, but they are all most assuredly, nuts. My father lines his baseball cap with foil, talks to
gnomes, and has a certain pair of sunglasses that he is convinced makes him invisible (it doesn't, btw). Since he's still alive, I'm afraid I
can't divulge his work (the tiny fraction I even know about), but it's awe-inspiring. When he was living, my grandfather stocked up on guns because
his invisible buddies told him to, carried around a live grenade, never slept, and refused to eat anything other than severely cremated toast and
beans. He was a grand-master chess player, helped develop the atom bomb alongside Oppenheimer, and either developed or had a major hand in the
foundation for radio control missile technology, robotics, and lasers. I even had a great...great...etc grandfather, who used to be mayor of Taos, NM.
At midnight he used to ride around, naked, on horseback, and fire off a shotgun "to keep the evil spirits at bay".
Do I think there's a correlation between genius and madness? Damned-straight I do.
My father, in one of his more lucid moments, explained it like this:
Even geniuses only use a certain capacity of our brain. For the sake of arguement, let's say it's 18% tops for anyone (I know the actual number is
different). That 18% becomes the max potential for most people, so let's just convert it to total points to allocate.
Perhaps you're Joe Average, and your brain is allocated as such.
3pts. for "Basic everyday tasks" (eating, hygiene, cleaning, driving, etc...)
3pts. for "Social Interaction" (conversation, sports, singing, etc...)
3pts. for "Creative Thought" (composing poems, painting, writing, etc...)
3pts. for "Memories" (remembering events, ability to recall details, etc...)
3pts. for "Logical Thought" (problem solving, completing sequences)
3pts. for "Moderation" (discipline, reality checks, distinguishing illusion)
That's how the average person works... but say you're an autistic savant, the allocation of points might be more like this:
2pts. for "Basic Tasks"
1pt. for "Social Interaction"
1pt. for "Creativity"
6pts. for "Memories"
6pts. for "Logic"
2pts. for "Moderation"
In essence, the points represent an exponential order of magnitude higher. Our Autistic Savant doesn't have twice the memory of Joe Ave, but rather
has (Joe's Logic)^3. In contrast, his social abilities, compared to Joe Ave are (Joe's Social)^-2.
Now there are variances that go along with this, usually only one order of magnitude in difference. Like some days, you just can't help but bark your
shins on every stupid end-table in the house, or you just can't seem to do even simple addition to save your life. That's normal, and some people
call it biorythmns, and some just call it having a bad day, or a good day.
Being a Genius, is like having a perpetually great day in a few certain areas, and a perpetual bad day in the rest.
Anyway, that's my Dad's theory on it. Seems the most logical I've heard so far.
Originally posted by LiquidationOfDiscrepancy
If so have you ever walked alone it’s beautiful unperceivable lines that crosses you from reality into a world of schizophrenia?
Lots of things get mistaken for Schizophrenia because of its two biggest symptoms: Paranoia, and Obsessive Compulsiveness. Those traits, however, are
not unique to it. Additionally, schizophrenia is almost always induced by child abuse at an early age, usually of a sexual nature. It develops because
at such a young age, the mind, as a defense mechanism, creates an alter ego to take the pain that the other ego cannot. Sometimes it is a dull roar in
the background of whisperings and voices. Other times it is one or more distinct voices that can often culminate even in visual hallucinations. It is
not, however, a prerequisite of being a genius. Some geniuses are schizophrenics, and some schizophrenics are dumb as posts. There is not a
correlation between the two.
Originally posted by LiquidationOfDiscrepancy
Dr. Ted Kaczynskiturn into a mad man?
Ted Kaczynski was not a genius. Far from it. In fact, most bomb squads that have studied his work are amazed at the incredible luck he displayed
because by all rights, he should have blown himself up, due to his shoddy workmanship and poor understanding of measurements.