It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
ill planned Bush's war on Iraq
We are to blame for this nightmare in Iraq, bad planning,
and at least the next 10 years of US occupation and involvement before we can pull out.
Its a good location for us.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Originally posted by Carseller4
i just wonder how many children where raped while doing this study? It was a UN study right?
They must have Catholic priests working for the UN.
As said before though, this wasn't a UN study that reported these figures.
Originally posted by Carseller4
i just wonder how many children where raped while doing this study? It was a UN study right?
Seriously, the UN has never had credibility, why should it start now?
Originally posted by worldwatcher
, sometimes i just don't have the words to reply to you,
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by worldwatcher
, sometimes i just don't have the words to reply to you,
Why, what was so unusual?
Originally posted by Nygdan
Since US troop presence in saudi arabia was a principle problem that bin ladin and other jihadis have with the world, this is no small consideration. The low occupation force was calculated so as to prevent an even larger uprising and to keep resentment amoung the general iraqi population low.
Originally posted by Nygdan
The US is fighting the occupation. It hasn't been completely succesful.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
We didn't want to use more troops in case we upset Osama?
Errr... The US IS the occupation.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Think about it. How does bin ladin rally his troops? How does he get muslims in that part of the world to attack the US? He talks about the occupation of arabia and the pressence of american troops, whoring their women, drinking alcohol, disobeying tradition, humiliating them. The message resonates with the public over there. Obviously bin ladin isn't directly the concern, its whoever might start saying, post-war, 'why are there so may americans here, are we just going to stand by while these jerks stride around our great country'.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
I really hope this wasn't a reason given by the administration for low troop numbers.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
I really hope this wasn't a reason given by the administration for low troop numbers.
They gave no reason, they simply said it was enough. I can't think of any other reason for it. Its a perfectly fine reason. They didn't expect any insurgency, they figured no one would want to support saddam or anything like that, and that by having a massive army filling their country that that might spark an insurgency.
[edit on 31-3-2005 by Nygdan]
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by Carseller4
i just wonder how many children where raped while doing this study? It was a UN study right?
Ha ha, not funny....
Besides those where Moroccan...
Seriously, the UN has never had credibility, why should it start now?
Was it credible enough in 1950?
1991?
You sure "rallied round the UN flag" then didnt you?
[edit on 26/02/2005 by devilwasp]
Originally posted by Carseller4
When I said never, I really meant never.
Rally around the UN flag, you got to be joking
USA! USA!