High IQ/IQ Test/ High IQ Organizations, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 31-3-2005 @ 09:45 PM by DragonsDemesne
practice test: 10/10 -no iq rating for this one
series: 10/13 -iq rating 131 - finished in time limit (easily)
quick iq test: 12/15 iq rating 136 -finished in time limit (barely!)
matrix A: 18/18 -iq rating 150 -forgot to run timer, dunno how long i took
dominoes test: 20/30 -iq rating 136
matrix B: 6/22 -iq rating 121 -ran out of time by a long shot

I got tired of the tests after that, which might partially explain the last score, hehe. Other IQ tests I have taken at other sites have ranged from 125 to 145 so I think these tests at nicologic are reasonably accurate, or at least as accurate as IQ tests go. Usually I get in the 130s so I wasn't too surprised by these results. I don't feel very smart, though. I should get some of my friends to take these and see if they get what I would expect, based on how smart/dumb I feel they are compared to me.

IQ tests tend to test 'pattern recognition' rather than what I would call 'intelligence', though. I suppose recognizing patterns is part of intelligence, but there's a lot of other things that make people smart, and there are people that have natural aptitudes for one thing and not another. Most of the tests I have seen are also biased towards mathematics and logic, as opposed to things like creativity.

Niels Bohr was a brilliant physicist, but his language skills were so bad he had to dictate his thesis to his mom to write down because he couldn't string two sentences together on a written page. My mom is brilliant with words and can write really well, and has an excellent memory, but she absolutely stinks at math. People have different skills and aptitudes, and different training, and I think this reflects on IQ tests.

Suppose instead of being raised in Canada, where I had access to good living conditions and 17 years of schooling (so far...), but instead grew up in some impoverished village somewhere, where I was lucky to get one meal a day and spent all my time doing manual labor for pennies so that there would be enough food on the table. I probably would have scored extremely low on an IQ test (assuming I was even literate enough to take it) I wouldn't put too much faith in these tests. People can have good days and bad days, too. Who knows, maybe if I took the other tests I haven't done yet, I might get much higher (or lower!) than I did today, due to amount of sleep, stress levels, or something else.

I took the tests at
www.highiqsociety.org... about 2-3 years ago, and got roughly the same scores I did on the ones at nicologic. If you really like these tests, maybe try the ones there, too.


reply posted on 31-3-2005 @ 11:51 PM by LiquidationOfDiscrepancy
Originally posted by DragonsDemesne
practice test: 10/10 -no iq rating for this one
series: 10/13 -iq rating 131 - finished in time limit (easily)
quick iq test: 12/15 iq rating 136 -finished in time limit (barely!)
matrix A: 18/18 -iq rating 150 -forgot to run timer, dunno how long i took
dominoes test: 20/30 -iq rating 136
matrix B: 6/22 -iq rating 121 -ran out of time by a long shot

I got tired of the tests after that, which might partially explain the last score, hehe. Other IQ tests I have taken at other sites have ranged from 125 to 145 so I think these tests at nicologic are reasonably accurate, or at least as accurate as IQ tests go. Usually I get in the 130s so I wasn't too surprised by these results. I don't feel very smart, though. I should get some of my friends to take these and see if they get what I would expect, based on how smart/dumb I feel they are compared to me.

IQ tests tend to test 'pattern recognition' rather than what I would call 'intelligence', though. I suppose recognizing patterns is part of intelligence, but there's a lot of other things that make people smart, and there are people that have natural aptitudes for one thing and not another. Most of the tests I have seen are also biased towards mathematics and logic, as opposed to things like creativity.

Niels Bohr was a brilliant physicist, but his language skills were so bad he had to dictate his thesis to his mom to write down because he couldn't string two sentences together on a written page. My mom is brilliant with words and can write really well, and has an excellent memory, but she absolutely stinks at math. People have different skills and aptitudes, and different training, and I think this reflects on IQ tests.

Suppose instead of being raised in Canada, where I had access to good living conditions and 17 years of schooling (so far...), but instead grew up in some impoverished village somewhere, where I was lucky to get one meal a day and spent all my time doing manual labor for pennies so that there would be enough food on the table. I probably would have scored extremely low on an IQ test (assuming I was even literate enough to take it) I wouldn't put too much faith in these tests. People can have good days and bad days, too. Who knows, maybe if I took the other tests I haven't done yet, I might get much higher (or lower!) than I did today, due to amount of sleep, stress levels, or something else.

I took the tests at
www.highiqsociety.org... about 2-3 years ago, and got roughly the same scores I did on the ones at nicologic. If you really like these tests, maybe try the ones there, too.






I might do that Isn't that the site were if you score over a 126 you get to become a member?


reply posted on 1-4-2005 @ 05:58 PM by LiquidationOfDiscrepancy
Originally posted by DragonsDemesne
LiquidationOfDiscrepancy
I might do that Isn't that the site were if you score over a 126 you get to become a member?


Yup that's the one. I did all of their tests except their 'test for exceptional intelligence' or whatever they call it. If you score 126 on any of their tests then for something like $59.95 you can join their society I'm not sure how anyone can be sucked into that, especially when they are supposed to be above average intelligence. I took those tests awhile back, I don't remember the exact scores but I think they were all in the 130s.

As to 'emotional quotient' I've heard of that, but how do you test it? I have a feeling mine is pretty crappy, probably below 100 anyway (if it's scored the same way as IQ) I just wish I had IQ of 150 so I could brag about being 'mensa' material hehe. Ah, well, maybe I'll get smarter, although I'm 23, so I doubt my IQ will change much, now, for most people it stays about the same as an adult.

I''m kind of curious though, what kind of scores did you get Liquidation? You seem like a pretty smart guy, or at least smarter than me. If you don't mind sharing, that is, I'd understand if you didn't want to.


Thank you Dragon. You are pretty smart guy yourself.
I taken an emotional intelligence test on tickle.com, or is it emode.com?
I think they are basically the same site, ah whatever lol.
I was actually hoping to join that high society crap, but for 60 dollars?
You gotta' be kiddin' me. Anyways I haven't taken any real professional IQ test, for I am only 17; but i'll u2u my result on the nicologic test.
Anywho, if you look around on emode.com you be sure to find an emotion IQ test. Some of there questions are like this.

How does this smiley feel?
A. Angry
B.Happy
C.Depressed
D. curious

but with actual people's pictures. Then they ask other questions based on what would you do in this situation type thing.

but let me know what you find, and happy searching if you care to look.

[edit on 063030p://555 by LiquidationOfDiscrepancy]

[edit on 063030p://555 by LiquidationOfDiscrepancy]


reply posted on 5-4-2005 @ 11:35 PM by phaedrusxxx
Originally posted by ThunderCloud

To use a classic analogy, think of your brain as a computer -- your brain has its own CPU (with its own number of transistors [neurons], and processing speed), hard drive, RAM, and operating system. An IQ test attempts to measure how powerful the CPU is, and ignores everything else...

[edit on 3/30/2005 by ThunderCloud]


I think that the computer analogy is excellent. However, why would and IQ test measure only the CPU?

Working memory = RAM
Crystallized knowledge = hard drive
Spatial ability = video card
processing speed, reaction time = CPU

I'm stretching the analogy a bit, I know, but you get the idea. Good IQ tests should have subtests that load heavily on smaller components and assigns weights to each of the subtest scores, which are then used to calculate a final IQ score.

An IQ test is more like a benchmark test that you run on your computer. It looks at each component and then spits out a score reflecting global ability. It's a good shortcut for assessing the big picture, but the downside is that you lose any idea of how the underlying components are functioning.

Also, I wonder if that online test is actually updating the distribution of IQ scores as people take the test. The IQ score is simply an indication of where you fall on the bell curve, as mentioned above. So if people keep taking it and the average person is scoring 115, the scores need to be restandardized so that the mean is 100. I highly doubt that the site is doing that. It would be neat to see if the site actually reports descriptive statistics on all of the people who have taken it. I wonder if it's actually a normal distribution.

phaedrus

[edit on 6-4-2005 by phaedrusxxx]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



A MUST Read, "Written By A Female Cop"
  Posted 3 days ago with 34 member flags
Know your enemy ... the Daily Mail & Viscount Rothermere
  Posted 13 days ago with 17 member flags
Pictures That Shocked The World (viewer discretion advised)
  Posted 1 days ago with 11 member flags
NBC and the Banned \'Fear Factor\' Episode
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags