posted on Jul, 19 2003 @ 12:38 AM
Cheney Was Bushs Triggerman in Escalating Intelligence Catfight
Vice President Dick Cheney was the true triggerman behind waging the imperialist war on Iraq.
Exclusive To American Free Press
By Gordon Thomas
Vice President Dick Cheney was the trigger which exploded the long-simmering war between the White House and the CIAs embattled director, George
He ordered Tenet last January to insert the now notorious 16 words that there was credible British intelligence that Saddam had tried in 2001 to buy
uranium ore (yellowcake) from Niger, the impoverished West African nation.
Three months before, in October 2002, Tenet had personally intervened to stop President Bush from making such a claim in a speech asserting that
Saddam had weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
Tenet told Bush he could not support the claim. When Cheney told him last January about the credible British intelligence, Tenet repeated his
warning that the CIA could not endorse it. In what one account says was a tense meeting, Cheney bluntly overruled Tenet.
The vice presidents action cast a shadow over British Prime Minister Tony Blairs visit to Washington.
Bush feels Britains intelligence services, MI6 and MI5, have not kept the CIA properly informed. Blair insists his spy agencies could not pass on
more information on the Niger yellowcake because, according to a London Foreign Office officer, under the rules governing cooperation they have with
foreign intelligence services, our service could not share intelligence from those sources without the originators permission. ...
...We dont believe for a moment that Tenet just fell on his own sword. What happened has all the hallmarks of Dick Cheney, said an MI6 source close
to the agencys director-general, Sir Richard Dearlove.
The reverberations have led to calls in London for Blair to resignand efforts by former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer to bring closure to the
row on the eve of his own departure from the administration.
Clare Short, who resigned from Blairs cabinet over Britain going to war on a false pretense, said Blair should now resign before matters get
nastier for him. Trust in him and Bush is going down by the day.
How all this happened is one of the most shocking stories to emerge in the post-Iraq war inquest.
ORIGINS OF NIGER SCANDAL
The complex story has simple roots. In November 2001, Italian secret service agents were approached by a West African diplomat. He said he had details
of a plot by the Iraqis to buy hundreds of tons of uranium ore from Niger. He produced supporting documents.
On the surface, the claim sounded credible. Iraq had already purchased 200 tons of yellowcake from Niger in 1986, the Italians told the CIA station in
Rome. The station chief sent a detailed report to Langley, including the documents the African diplomat had provided.
The material was sent to the State Department. The U.S. ambassador to Niger at the time, Barbro Owens-Kirk Patrick, was asked to assess all the
But while she was doing so, Cheney intervened. He told a senior diplomat, Joseph Wilsonwho had first-hand knowledge of Nigerthat he wanted him to go
there and investigate the claims.
By the time he arrived, Owens-Kirkpatrick had dismissed the documents as crude forgeriesand the African diplomats claims to the Italians as pure
Wilson concurred. His own investigation showed that Nigers security on yellowcakeintroduced after Saddams previous purchasewas too rigorous for
any Iraqi attempt to purchase uranium ore to have gone undetected.
In March 2002, Wilson briefed Tenet. He passed on Wilsons findings to his British counterpart, Sir Richard Dearlove of MI6. He informed the head of
MI5, Eliza Manningham-Buller, and John Scarlett, the former spy who now chairs Britains Joint Intelligence Committee. His job is to know anything
that can be known about Saddam and his WMD.
On Sept. 24, 2002, Blair published his governments dossier on Iraqs weapons of mass destruction. It included the claim Iraq has sought the supply
of significant amounts of uranium from Africa.
It did not say whenlet alone whetherthis had been in the 1980s. Neither was Niger mentioned. But to Wilson it was obvious this was the same story
as in the discredited documents.
There the matter may have died as far as the White House went if Bush had not wanted to include the details in his October speech of last year.
Having headed him off, Tenet believed the bogus Niger connection was over. But then Cheney made his fateful visit to Langley last January to demand
that Tenet should allow the Niger story to form part of Bushs State of the Union speech.
Tenet, say credible sources, was horrified. He reminded Cheney that both Owens-Kirkpatrick and Wilson had refuted any Niger connection.
Cheney was insistent. He said there was credible evidence from British intelligence. He cited the Blair report. He reminded Tenet of Saddams previous
acquisition of yellowcake in the 1980s.
Tenet had explained Niger had no capability to enrich uranium orethe basic prerequisite to producing a nuclear bomb. He added that, after the first
gulf war ended, UN inspectors had destroyed Saddams essential equipment that could turn the ore into fissionable material.
The CIA was certain that Iraq had not been able to repair the equipment. Tenet also reminded Cheney he had personally intervened to stop Bush
including the Niger story in his speech three months before, in October 2002.
Cheney, according to one CIA source, came close to critical mass.
He told Tenet that National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice had now received good intelligence from London that Saddam had tried to buy uranium
ore from Niger in 2001. Therefore that would go into the State of the Union speechand Tenet must accept the British intelligence.
The clear implication from Cheney was that the Brits knew more than we did, said the CIA source.
Bush, traveling back from his African trip, told reporters that Tenet had cleared the reference to Niger.
Rice went further: If the CIA director had said take this out, it would have gone, without question.
Tenet did say that. Cheney overruled himonce more citing the British credible sources. So who were they?
Intelligence sources believe there are two. The French secret service (DGSE) and Mossad.
Both have a strong presence in West Africa.
Niger is a former French colony.
Israel receives a substantial portion of its oil from adjoining Nigeria.
Nigers uranium mines are run by a French company which is supervised by the French Atomic Energy Commission.
In London, MI6 insists the evidence from these sources remains credible.
British intel sources say that a further factor in the refusal to share its information about Niger with the CIA is concern that the White House
would publish itand lead to our sources being uncovered, said a London source.
On his trip to London to meet Blair, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was accompanied by Meir Dagan, head of Mossad. He met Sir Richard Dearlove
and Eliza Manningham-Buller.
High on their list was the Niger uranium claim. No one still knows if the French-Mossad intelligence is credible.
Did Mossad provide it as part of Israels own strategy to ramp-up the war against Iraq?
Did French intelligence refuse to allow the CIA to see its own intelligence because the Paris government was strongly opposed to the coming war with
Iraqand would not wish to provide Washington with any support for military action?
At a recent meeting, Bush confronted Blair with these questions.
But there is little optimism that there will be resolution to a growing crisis which has already blighted the leadership of both men.
[Edited on 19-7-2003 by MaskedAvatar]