It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Was Tsunamy a natural disater or "Sea Burst"?

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 26 2005 @ 01:13 PM
There are many provable irregularities in the official tsunami story that raise a lot of questions.

It is beyond any doubt that a giant tidal wave smashed its way through South and South East Asia carrying on to the western shores of Africa.

When the fault line starts to tremble like a piece of rope under tension, it sends out warnings to the seismographs in the form of steadily increasing transverse shear waves.

If you get is a cluster of "P" compression waves, then one is most certainly looking at an underground or sub sea explosion. They were the only copious seismic signals that the Indonesians and Indians received, and they looked very similar to those generated many years ago by large underground nuclear weapons in Nevada.

There is nothing new about "Sea Bursts" as they are called, and more than 30 years ago plans existed in both America and Russia to wipe out each other's coastal cities using exactly this technique. The tidal wave from a deep sea burst is relatively clean, allowing the aggressor to take over both land and remaining buildings with the minimum of delay.


The question is: could China or Russia be behind this, and why? What's your opinion? If not, who could be behind this and why?

This is a thread for those who are willing to explore further this possibility.


log in