posted on Mar, 30 2005 @ 02:22 PM
Oops! My preferred subject.By chance I got involved in studing (and deciphering) those Vinca "supposed writings".My conclusions are as folows:
1.The appearance of drowing and signs in Europe begun in times as 40.000BC.There are many of them in The caves of
France,Spain,Cechoslovakia and the rest of Europe. 2.There are remains of begining of writing in Europe (Azil,Glozel) for the 8.000-10.000BC
period.As long as I know those writings are undeciphered.My personal opinion is that the final point was an finished writing system. 3.Theoretically
the emergence of writing could happen independently in different areas.Not to forget that those ancient people were in a constant moove,and the
information the same.Could happen anything from the appearance of a writing system at a distant point from origin (with not too too much chances in my
opinion) to changing information and improving one writing system from an area with some knoledge from another area (with much chances in my
opinion).4. Writing is associated in my opinion ,in ancient times with evolved societies;writing is becoming at one point a strong need for a evolved
society.Like the appearance of new tools. 5. In Europe,the time-chart of "searching for writing" are in a decreasing order,from older,as
follows:Azilian/Glozel ,Danubian,Linear A,B,Etruscan,Greek.I found an comparison work in wich the Danubian,Linear,Etruscan are in the same order as
above,and some-how evidenced in theoretical functional relation,(parent-child.)6. An writing system could evolve from thousend of signs wich every of
them could represent something more or little definite ;from general notions/pictographic,to a phonetic-one in wich a sign could reprezent morphemes
(as a consonant-vocal pair),to a alphabetic one.In those European systems all could happen until scientist will demonstrate otherwise.6.I studied more
the "supposed Vinca writing".Here:my opinion is that the vast majority of writings are as you stated above:unfinished,for religious purposes and for
counting objects/marking purposes.Here I am strongly for some of them to be representative of a "real writing".I don't know where the signs are
from or detailed explanation.Partly to know for sure one must be a good detective, beside other scientific fields.Could be many others unearthed (in
fact there is sufficiently only some 5 of them,written with the same "alphabet" to sustain an "real writing system". 7.The latter are containing
signs wich are used in many ancient scripts in the same period (4.500-3.500 BC).8. My strong opinion is that Azilian-Glozel "writing" could be known
in entire Europe,but found proper climate/conditions in the Danube civilisation ,allready quite developed(Lepenski-Vir,Vinca,etc).The carriers of
writings were no others than the hunter-gatheres from paleolithic and partly neolithic,mainly of proto-Iberian stock;if you want,name
them:proto-Ibero-Celts.(I know celts could sound strange here).I am also for an early Iberian-Danubian people extention in Eurasia,somehaw oposite to
latter Anatolian-Near-East influx.Don't ask me please for the exact periods ,detailed routes,etc.9.I am proposing you,that especially in the periods
previous of IE-comings,extensive Eurasian territories were occupied by the well-known "pelasgians",especially:Europe,Mediterranean area,Caucasus and
Near-East.The population pressure points/areas were :Anatolia-Near-East-Africa.Those people were allready mixed in a good grade/mesure. 10.For latter
'supposed Vinca writings" there are only the folowing origin hypothesis:Iberian area,the signs maybe slightly changed,Sumerian-palestinian area and
also as a posibility,local,Danubian area.My opinion/chances are: for the first,90%, second 80%,third 30%. 11. One must note the folowing types of
civilisation in mesolitic in Serbia-Western Romania:Tardonesian centro-european,Azilian,Late Gravettian (of romanello-azilian aspect).Don't ask what
these are meaning,ask the archeologists.i understand the azilian connection,or azilian-type cultures.