Originally posted by quango
Originally posted by Antichrist
And mind you, what I said about christianism is also valid for most if not all religions.
They are just as true for your own viewpoint.
I've done you the favor of showing you your own post as it speaks on AntiChristianity. Additions and changes by me are in bold.
Please realize that my point is for you to live how you want to live and to let others live (and believe) how they want.
-originally posted by AntiChrist, with changes by me(in bold):
What evil did antichristinity do? well, I'll make you a list.
1. antiChristianity dehumanises Man, antiChristinity is deeply against the spiritual nature of man, thus it strives to destroy
that part of Man's nature dehumanizing him, just as an example.
2. antiChristianity de-individualizes the individual, as any mass-culture antiChristianity tries to have all men think equal and behave
equal to each other, not only because this is the purpose of any mass-culture but also because it's the only way for a cultural trend to survive and
3. antiChristianity destroys free-will. By imposing laws, by setting ethical and moral (and spiritual)standarts, antiChristianism
has imposed a mental barrier to man, worst of all, by threats.
Christianity poses a threat to all humankind...Now I surely would not want that, and thus I (we) fight. - (posted by antichrist,
4. antiChristianism destroys mental capabilities. True antiChristians don't seek answers, true antiChristians find no God
beneath any question mark, true antiChristians bow to hatred and attack whenever they see anything they don't understand. If you, for
any reason, don't act like this, than mind yourself, you are not a true antichristian, . . .Just go read a damn novel.
There is no spiritual nature of man IMHO, what you think is the spiritual nature of man I think is the result of 2k years of inject religiousness and
belief in higher beings, if I have NO spiritual side, it can't be that spirituality is inherent to Man.
Others would tell you that your spirituality is a mere quest to hide your own weakness towards nature and its mysteries and an easy answer, thus not
an inherent feature of Man but an undesirable trait of some men.
Antichristianism is not a mass-culture, antichristianism is the result of the work of the thinker Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche who sought of
INDIVIDUALISM, he never wanted anyone to follow him blindly, infact in his books, the character of Zatathustra, an "antichristian priest" did indeed
reject his followers did indeed repent his sayings and his teachings when he realised they turned to a mass-culture, which lead him to run away from
Antichristianism does set only 1 standart, you ought to be strong in order to be able to face reality's nihilism without recurring to spiritual
answers which don't exist, you ought to be strong by yourself and be able to see past the easy answers.
Antichristianism does not impose neither ethic or moral standarts, it imposes a general moral and ethic anarchy in which one is free to create himself
his own set of morals and ethic code, this would be the oposition of any kind of moral and ethic dictatorship.
Antichristians do indeed find no God beneath every questionmark, thus they are not stuck in the easy answer (God) and, by reflecting on reality evolve
on their mental capabilities. Antichristianism is then mentl-capabilities-friendly
Antichristians bow to moral anarchy, if it's man's nature to attack and hate, there's your existential answers. A
And indeed I think you are judging antichristianism based on prejudice, we do not attack anything we do not understand, we do try and find answers. I
am trying to be a physicist, that's probably my future career and I still don't understand the string theory I find it strange and yet I don't go
saying "This is all bullsh, this is all wrong obviously. Newtonian laws are still the only universal truth, relativity is just plain nonsense", in
fact one of my goals is to study and try to understand the workings of the string theory. This is just meant as an example, your prejudice is
understandable, after all, when discussing antichristianism, we are talking about an extreme change in philosophical views.
Antichristians act morally as they want, because antichristianism is about moral anarchy, thus saying "if you don't act like this you are not a true
antichristian" is like saying "if you don't vote for party A you are not a true anarchist.".