It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Neon Haze
I believe that the expansion of the universe is actually what causes time to exist.
[....]
Well what if the entire universe was to stop moving??
Would everything on the earth fly off caused by inertia
or would time itself just stop?
Originally posted by Neon Haze
Wouldn't it be a true statement that Time Flows??
Well what if the entire universe was to stop moving?? Would everything on the earth fly off caused by inertia or would time itself just stop?
you could say that if the universe's expansion is speeding up then time itself is speeding up
... but what if it's not the speed of light that has slowed but the expansion of the universe that has accelerated??
If we were not to move through the cosmos time itself would not exist
Originally posted by St Udio
perhaps 'expansion' even motion/vibration, or even probability are fractile
spin-offs of 'time' and not the other-way-around??
nice, thoughtful post you made
Originally posted by St Udio
perhaps 'expansion' even motion/vibration, or even probability are fractile
spin-offs of 'time' and not the other-way-around??
nice, thoughtful post you made
Originally posted by steggyD
Weren't there theories that once the universe expands so far, that it will eventually contract? If so, then would we go backwards through time as the universe contracts?
Time and Expansion are the same.
Originally posted by Macrento
Time and Expansion are the same.
That's no new insight. You're just repeating what those that agree with the Big Bang theory want us to believe: that space and time were created simultaneously when the expansion of space began at a "singularity", a point of infinite density. According to this viewpoint, expansion of the universe, space and time are inconceivable by themselves. They imply one another. For these people, it is senseless to talk about what came before that, because there was no "before", so they never ask what came before the first nanosecond of the expansion, nor do they ask themselves why it started. They consider them to be meaningless questions. They claim that, just as in mathematics division by zero is impossible simply because it is undefined, so existence before the expansion of space is impossible because science cannot conceive it or define it. For a scientist, if it is inconceivable, it does not exist.
*
Originally posted by spike
I somewhat agree. I think the crux of the matter is that movement itself is what we perceive as time. We know that our observable universe is 4-Dimensional. Length, width, height, and time. Any object and/or event can be described using these 4 variables. We know also that physicists consider all of these dimensions collectivly as SpaceTime; That is to say that they are all part of the same fabric of the universe. So, it's my belief that removing time from the equation, would mean the dissolve of the universe as we know it. For that matter, the same holds true for the other 3. It's possible that a universe could theoreticaly exist with only the dimensions of length, width, and height, but the moment you add movement, you MUST add time to the equation. So I do think that Time is an effect of movement and vise versa. I dont think you can have one without the other. I don't however think that "expansion" is really the key here. Expansion, I think, just happens to fall under the broad umbrella of MOVEMENT.
Originally posted by Neon Haze
Originally posted by St Udio
perhaps 'expansion' even motion/vibration, or even probability are fractile
spin-offs of 'time' and not the other-way-around??
nice, thoughtful post you made
Originally posted by steggyD
Weren't there theories that once the universe expands so far, that it will eventually contract? If so, then would we go backwards through time as the universe contracts?
hehehe lol well I know that theory though I tend to go with the expansion forever or the big rip theory myself...
though have you ever seen a comedy program called "Red Dwarf"?
it was a spoof Sci-fi series in the late 80's and 90's.
There was an episode called Backwards..
it was about the very thing you describe. the red dwarf (which was a mining space ship) had acquired a time drive and jumped through time to the future where the universe was contracting...
they land on earth and everything is back wards.. Ie. London was called Nodnol hehehe )
Anyway you can image what it was like when they went to a pub and got a black eye sucked off the face in a fight
The funniest bit though was when they went to the Toilet!!! Especially cause it was a Number 2 lolololol ;p hehehe
All the best,
NeoN.
(posted by Neon Haze)
I'm confused by your post.... sorry... can you try and explain that again please??