Sol 3060 MARS CURIOSTY ANOMALIES March 2021

Pouring over this NASA panoramic I am finding some pretty odd structures. I mean, it's Mars, comparing objects may appear to simply be pareidolia. But these are pretty solidly something! First, a pair of identical, side by side, structures. They are to the left of the rover. Note: the perfectly round portions, with a pointed object at the back of each.

Next in the distance straight ahead of the rover on a mountain ridge.

The structure on the right And the left, this one is like liquid shooting out of a structure

a reply to: MayRenee

I got all excited by the title.

Feel let down now.

a reply to: MayRenee

Your first image looked exciting, but after a search I found a video I could zoom in on.

It looks like the twin structure is a camera glitch. The one on the left is ghosted in respect to the other. It is like a double exposure.



Here's the source 360° video.
www.360cities.net...

Thanks for stopping by.

originally posted by: Moohide
a reply to: MayRenee

I got all excited by the title.

Feel let down now.

Yes, that is the video I did my screenshots from. Did NASA say it is a camera glitch? Where did you get that information? I want to log it, because I'm still proud of my find, even if what I have found is a documented camera glitch on Mars.

originally posted by: Encia22
a reply to: MayRenee

Your first image looked exciting, but after a search I found a video I could zoom in on.

It looks like the twin structure is a camera glitch. The structure to the left is more blurred than the other.

Here's the source 360° video.
www.360cities.net...

a reply to: Encia22

It looks like the twin structure is a camera glitch. The structure to the left is more blurred than the other.

This is probably a stupid question since it's from a video, but it was my first thought so I'll say it anyways....

Could it be some sort of error/flaw from their stitching program?

a reply to: MayRenee

I wasn't putting down your research. It's great that you are searching. I only said camera glitch for want of a better technical explanation. However, zooming makes it clear to me that something is not right... I wish it had been a twin structure.

a reply to: BrokenCircles

I think that's probably right.

originally posted by: MayRenee
Yes, that is the video I did my screenshots from. Did NASA say it is a camera glitch? Where did you get that information? I want to log it, because I'm still proud of my find, even if what I have found is a documented camera glitch on Mars.

It's still an interesting find nonetheless.

Thats fine. I still think it is cool. a reply to: Encia22

originally posted by: MayRenee
Pouring over this NASA panoramic I am finding some pretty odd structures. I mean, it's Mars, comparing objects may appear to simply be pareidolia. But these are pretty solidly something! First, a pair of identical, side by side, structures.

Why are you looking at and posting such extremely poor quality images when there is much better imagery available? They don't look identical even in your poor quality image, but you can see in the higher quality image that your pareidolia of identical structures completely disappears:


That's a cropped image to display better on ATS limited width display area, but the links to the uncropped images are here:

Curiosity Sol3060 Images Link

originally posted by: MayRenee
Here's the source 360° video.
www.360cities.net...

The 360 degree video is made by stitching smaller images together so it's a really bad idea to look for anomalies in the 360 degree video which is subject to stitching errors. You could look at it as a starting point, then go to the individual images to get away from the stitching errors, but as you can see the individual images look quite a bit different than the panorama and the individual images are more accurate for anomaly analysis.

originally posted by: Encia22
a reply to: BrokenCircles

I think that's probably right.

I didn't see your link the first time, but now I think I get it....

It's not a true video. It's just a video created from many individual images.

Well let's see, I don't know. Maybe it's because I'm not an expert? Maybe it's because like I said, it's some pictures that came up in my Facebook feed . I never claimed to be an expert , I'm absolutely not . I am a curious person who blew up some pictures and saw some weird #. Since I come to a weird website , I thought it'd be interesting to post said weird # . reply to: BrokenCircles

Mods, you can remove my thread. It's not good enough to be here, it sucks, I suck for posting it, I should be strung up by my toenails and all my blood drained.

originally posted by: MayRenee
Mods, you can remove my thread. It's not good enough to be here, it sucks, I suck for posting it, I should be strung up by my toenails and all my blood drained.

I enjoyed the post and the pictures I would not have seen them had you not post even if the double was not an oddity itself.

That was a great pick up, wouldn’t have noticed it myself
Unfortunately just a simple camera glitch but well spotted

I thought the 4th pic was very odd, it's probably a glitch too.

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: MayRenee
Mods, you can remove my thread. It's not good enough to be here, it sucks, I suck for posting it, I should be strung up by my toenails and all my blood drained.

I enjoyed the post and the pictures I would not have seen them had you not post even if the double was not an oddity itself.

a reply to: MayRenee

There's a large portion of the population that simply can't see things in any images. Moon anomalies or Mars anomalies, they just can't see them. Other people can clearly see them. I found what looks like a discarded electric motor in a curiosity image.


When I posted that long ago many people said it's just a rock.

I see the anomalies your images. Great catch..

PS those who just can't see anything will say that those who can are mistaken and ignorant. They will use every excuse and ridicule available to protect themselves.

Regardless of what your images represent, anomalies or not, there are many images of Mars terrain with things in them that are officially not there or of things not supposed to be there.

NASA's idea is to make us believe Mars is a totally boring planet.

NASA's second idea is to convince us that is ok to take Mars because nobody's there.

Mars colonies will be the biggest business in mankind history.

Mars colonies will be the cause of the biggest war in mankind history.