It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
And Corrigan isn't the only one.
But Corrigan is wrong, it changes nothing in your DNA.
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
I could see how some could take that as a pretty bigoted remark.
They don't even temporarily alter DNA, so no.
originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
I agree, we're far far out of our league here. However isn't the difference that with the vaccination you supply your own cells with the spikes that normally would be found by antibodies on the virus itself?
originally posted by: daskakik
No, you are not supplying your cells with these spikes added to them, they are sending the signal to the cells responsible for producing antibodies to produce and release antibodies for this spike, like it would happen naturally in case of infection.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: cooperton
What the paper used in the article in the OP proposes that the covid virus "might" be a retrovirus.
If that is the case, there is no escaping the assimilation into our DNA anyway for everyone becoming infected, vax or no vax.
originally posted by: cooperton
No it's specifically talking about the virus-emulating vaccine.
originally posted by: daskakik
]
The article is, but the paper cited is only talking about the virus, proposing that it might be a retrovirus and that is why the tests might be coming back positive.
The article then piggybacks on that, in true pseudo-scientific fashion, to harp on about the vaccines.