It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why do you think that? I'm curious to know your reasoning. In my opinion, it's possible to maintain a much larger percentage of the population at comfortable levels while allowing entrepeneurs and hard workers to advance and earn money to buy luxuries.
Why do I have to do that? Believing something doesn't give you the right to mislead people into believing you have control over their immortal soul. It's a simple case of extortion.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
If Jesus was simply some guy trying to scare people into listening to him, he would have used force, and not just rhetoric. His goal was to teach an ideal.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
I'd argue that to Jesus, hell and heaven were not a physical place, but a mental state. There is a story left out of the bible where Jesus is asked how it could be fair to send sinners to hell to burn for eternity for mistakes made in just a lifetime. He states that there really isn't a hell. To Jesus, the idea was to teach people how to make themselves happier. It was teaching people what true happiness was.
And force is not the most effective way to coerce people and resolve conflict. Look to the animal kingdom, those animals that have evolved effective threat displays are more prone to survive because they don't have to expend all the energy to fight all the time, like less evolutionarily 'clever' creatures do
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
And force is not the most effective way to coerce people and resolve conflict. Look to the animal kingdom, those animals that have evolved effective threat displays are more prone to survive because they don't have to expend all the energy to fight all the time, like less evolutionarily 'clever' creatures do
It worked pretty good in Nazi Germany. It's also working pretty good in the Middle East today. It worked pretty good for religious institutions throughout history, as well.
"All the believers were one heart and mind. No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they shared everything they had. … There were no needy persons among them. For from time to time, those who owned lands or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone as he had need"
Acts 4:32-35
None of those people had to join him. They were free to do what they want. What you're talking would break a fundamental rule of god called Free Will. Jesus taught people how to live. He never forced people to live any way.
Matt 17:
24 When they reached Capernaum, the collectors of the temple taxi came to Peter and said, "Does your teacher not pay the temple tax?"j 25He said, "Yes, he does." And when he came home, Jesus spoke of it first, asking, "What do you think, Simon? From whom do kings of the earth take toll or tribute? From their children or from others?" 26When Peterk said, "From others," Jesus said to him, "Then the children are free. 27However, so that we do not give offense to them, go to the sea and cast a hook; take the first fish that comes up; and when you open its mouth, you will find a coin;l take that and give it to them for you and me."
Originally posted by jlc163
In christinity, you give as you can handle giving, to those who need help, as they need it....this is not where you force everyone to be on the same level.
Originally posted by invader_chris
I read somewhere that the early Christians lived in Communist communities, yet it was mostly Christians that bashed Communism during the 20th century.