9th Circuit Court Of Appeals Rules THERE IS NO RIGHT TO CARRY, page 2

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 04:42 PM

link

Concealed carry and guns in general is a State by State level event... That is why you go to the Shariff to get it, so I'm not sure what the 9th is trying to say there.

Creep Thumper

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 05:06 PM

link

originally posted by: Butterfinger
AK, HI, CA, AZ, OR, WA, & MT.

Blue states, they asked for it...

et tu, Montana?

I heard it has the largest pop of pedos so F them too, if true! LOL

Montana is blue?!

chiefsmom

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 05:18 PM

link

In other news, "9th circuit court of appeals found to be stocked with people who cannot read"

We let this happen.
We need to fix this.

MichiganSwampBuck

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 05:42 PM

link

Wrong Thread.

edit on 24-3-2021 by MichiganSwampBuck because: Corrections

Bigburgh

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 05:47 PM

link

originally posted by: Creep Thumper

originally posted by: Butterfinger
AK, HI, CA, AZ, OR, WA, & MT.

Blue states, they asked for it...

et tu, Montana?

I heard it has the largest pop of pedos so F them too, if true! LOL

Montana is blue?!

Not necessarily, not Montana's fault given the states that the 9th CCoA covers.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (in case citations, 9th Cir.) is a federal court of appeals that has appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:

District of AlaskaDistrict of ArizonaCentral District of CaliforniaEastern District of CaliforniaNorthern District of CaliforniaSouthern District of CaliforniaDistrict of HawaiiDistrict of IdahoDistrict of MontanaDistrict of NevadaDistrict of OregonEastern District of WashingtonWestern District of WashingtonUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit(9th Cir.)LocationJames R. Browning U.S. Court of Appeals Building

(San Francisco, California)

More locations

William Kenzo Nakamura U.S. Courthouse

(Seattle, Washington)

Pioneer Courthouse

(Portland, Oregon)

Richard H. Chambers U.S. Court of Appeals

(Pasadena, California)

Appeals from

District of AlaskaDistrict of ArizonaCentral District of CaliforniaEastern District of CaliforniaNorthern District of CaliforniaSouthern District of CaliforniaDistrict of HawaiiDistrict of IdahoDistrict of MontanaDistrict of NevadaDistrict of OregonEastern District of WashingtonWestern District of WashingtonDistrict of GuamDistrict of the Northern Mariana Islands

EstablishedMarch 3, 1891Judges29Circuit JusticeElena KaganChief JudgeSidney R. Thomaswww.ca9.uscourts.gov

It also has appellate jurisdiction over the following territorial courts:
District of GuamDistrict of the Northern Mariana Islands

beyondknowledge

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 05:52 PM

link

The police are not going to like this.

o clarify that open carry is proper only when the license-holder is “in the actual performance of his duties or within the area of his assignment.”

The exception allows citizens to obtain a license to carry a loaded handgun in public, either concealed or openly, under certain circumstances. H.R.S. § 134-9. Respecting concealed carry, section 134-9 provides that “n an exceptional case, when an applicant shows reason to fear injury to the applicant’s person or property, the chief of police . . . may grant a license to an applicant . . . to carry a pistol or revolver and ammunition therefor concealed on the person.

It seems that the police are not allowed to carry while off duty or out of jurisdiction without a permit from that chief of police or possibly sheriff.

Gonna get a lot of officers shot.
edit on 3 24 2021 by beyondknowledge because: (no reason given)

JinMI

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 05:57 PM
link

...keep AND bear.

Shall not be...

Oh you know. The thing.

DBCowboy

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 06:03 PM
link

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Like I've always said; I will obey the government and turn in every registered firearm I own if they required it.

Guyfriday

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 06:10 PM
link

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Like I've always said; I will obey the government and turn in every registered firearm I own if they required it.

That's good, because I heard that Harris will pay you a "visit" if you don't. Biden is sending her out to deal with all the sucky jobs.

True story time:
I reported a break in at my house and reported a few guns missing. When the police got here they said that I might get in trouble for making a false report for an insurance claim. The responding Officer said that they doubted I had any guns at all.

A few weeks later I had to go down to the police station to pick up my firearms since they had been recovered, when a Police Friend of mine saw them at a crime scene.

So hey if a cop doesn't believe that I own any firearms, then why should the government?

DBCowboy

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 06:11 PM
link

a reply to: Guyfriday

I will obey the government and turn in every registered firearm I own if they required it.

Guyfriday

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 06:15 PM
link

a reply to: DBCowboy

In the house office I have a gun display case that shows off reproduction firearms of the American Revolution. If an official want to take my guns that is what I will show them. Assault Weapons of 1776.

Let them think about it since they seem to think otherwise about my firearms. Oh and I know that a few of those folks are reading this, so show your warrant, and I will show you the flint-lock weapon collection I have.

daskakik

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 06:18 PM
link

a reply to: Xtrozero
Seems to be media spin, not the OP's fault since it is the title of the article, but the decision seems to be that the states have the power to regulate.

This article's title seems to be a little more accurate: Amid gun control debate, federal court rules states may restrict open carry of weapons

ETA: These seems to be the courts decision, 215 pages, if anyone is so inclined.
edit on 24-3-2021 by daskakik because: (no reason given)

Mandroid7

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 06:26 PM
link

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
The police are not going to like this.

o clarify that open carry is proper only when the license-holder is “in the actual performance of his duties or within the area of his assignment.”

The exception allows citizens to obtain a license to carry a loaded handgun in public, either concealed or openly, under certain circumstances. H.R.S. § 134-9. Respecting concealed carry, section 134-9 provides that “n an exceptional case, when an applicant shows reason to fear injury to the applicant’s person or property, the chief of police . . . may grant a license to an applicant . . . to carry a pistol or revolver and ammunition therefor concealed on the person.

It seems that the police are not allowed to carry while off duty or out of jurisdiction without a permit from that chief of police or possibly sheriff.

Gonna get a lot of officers shot.

This is the key here. Time to back the blue.
Time to arrest politicians.

This is known by politicians. A lot of sherriff's are pro 2a and connected to their communities.
This is the reason the media has been pushing "the police are evil" bs
Pretty dangerous game they are playing.

ToddB

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 06:46 PM
link

What purpose do 535 members of Congress and thousands of State and County elected Representatives serve if laws are coming from the writing of one pen?
None, whatsoever!

DBCowboy

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 06:48 PM
link

Someone screwed up their italics.

Fixed
edit on 24-3-2021 by DBCowboy because: Covid drank my beer

Xtrozero

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 06:50 PM
link

originally posted by: daskakik
Amid gun control debate, federal court rules states may restrict open carry of weapons

I always have problems with rules like this as I don't think the 9th understand what "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." actually means. lol

"Infringed"

To encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another...

daskakik

posted on Mar, 24 2021 @ 09:24 PM
link

a reply to: Xtrozero
The reason I replied to your post was because you mentioned it being a state level event and that is pretty much what this decision seems to be saying.

Seems like this decision doesn't really change what is already in effect in each state.

rnaa

posted on Mar, 25 2021 @ 06:11 AM
link

originally posted by: rickymouse
So, in other words, nobody has the right to hunt except on their own land. I guess I don't need to buy a hunting license this year. Public includes public lands including road easements.

Settle down.

Absent a license under section 134-9, a person to transport an unloaded firearm, in an enclosed container, to and from a place of repair, a target range, a licensed dealer, a firearms exhibit, a hunting ground, or a police station, H.R.S. §§ 134-23, 134-24, 134-25, 134-26, 134-27, and may only use those firearms while “actually engaged” in hunting or target shooting, H.R.S. § 134-5

(from page 7 of the case summary in the finding document : Young v State of Hawaii.)

Section 134-9 sets limits on open carry and concealed carry. Section 134-9 is what is under attack here, not hunting or target shooting).

You are not going to miss out on hunting on account of this.

MichiganSwampBuck

posted on Mar, 25 2021 @ 06:53 AM
link

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Xtrozero
The reason I replied to your post was because you mentioned it being a state level event and that is pretty much what this decision seems to be saying.

Seems like this decision doesn't really change what is already in effect in each state.

I hope this is how it works. As rnaa in the post after yours states it, that is the law here in Michigan already basically. You must have your fire arm unloaded in a case and separate from any ammo you have while transporting.

However, in Michigan you are allowed to open carry any place except in the following places.

Court buildings, Theaters, Sports Arenas, Day Care Centers, Hospitals, School Zones, An establishment with a liquor license, Airports, Federal Buildings, Post Offices, Casinos, Banks and Financial Institutions, Church/House of Worship, and Vehicles.

Also, there are any number of business owners that don't want customers carrying in there place of business.
edit on 25-3-2021 by MichiganSwampBuck because: Typo

Ringsofsaturn777

posted on Mar, 25 2021 @ 07:17 AM
link

Whenever you see "9th circuit court of appeals rules" you can go ahead and bet your rent money that their ruling will be thrown out.