The Upcoming Global Technocratic Dictatorship.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

In Heck's view, right-wing anti-Trilateralism has always been rooted in simple isolationism. "This country finds it difficult to be so interdependent with the rest of the world, given our history and our national traditions," he says. "It's a hard lesson for [Americans] to grasp."

The idea behind creating the commission, he says, was that "the United States would never again be in such a singularly dominant position as in the immediate post-World-War-II era, and that leadership in the world would have to be shared." Now, such matters as the ecology -- a new focus of Trilateralist study -- will require global cooperation, Heck says.

"It does not run the world," says Time magazine Editor-at-Large Strobe Talbott, who's been a Trilateralist for at least six years. "Present company emphatically excluded, it's made up of a number of highly influential people. The body itself does not presume some sort of unitary influence. In fact, quite the contrary. ... There's a lot of diversity.

"The proceedings I would describe as much more like a large and high-powered seminar than a parliament or a board of directors," he says.

www.washingtonpost.com...

I place 0 (ZERO) stock in the notion that MSM would have any non-biased, critical assessment of Trilateral Communion or any such so-called technocratic bodies.

There was a quote attributed to one of these figures, a Rockefeller if I'm not mistaken, who praised the media (referring to New York Times by name) in their role as propaganda tools to bathe this unelected body of "influential people" in a favorable, non-sinister light.

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. … It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

^^^ This should set off alarm bells in your brain, for if people are genuinely acting in the benefit of the global community, obfuscation and lack of transparency would be the LAST thing on their mind. The only reason to want to hide your activities would be to avoid p!ssing people off, and the fastest way to p!ss people off is to act against their interest/disenfranchise them.

Anybody still reading these publications expecting some semblance of objective view of world events is either too simple to understand the connotations of the connection shared between these entities, or they are a sado-masochist enjoying being molded and sculpted like a ball of putty.

originally posted by: Serdgiam

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: karl 12

4. The "great reset" is better described as the "great transformation" because the plan is not a restart but a world wide revolution

😬

I would argue that that "revolution" is 100% inevitable, however it is not synonymous or interchangeable with the "great reset."

Of course, the ones pushing the "great reset" have a vested interest in convincing people otherwise!

The "great reset" is essentially the technocratic vision to not only maintain establishment dominance (whatever you want to call that), but proliferate it to the greatest extent possible.

Plenty of other courses and paths for our civilization, naturally, but the marketing has done a staggeringly impressive job in convincing many people that all these terms are not only interchangeable, but that it is their vision that is inevitable.

In reality, its the technological revolution itself that is inevitable. But, as long as most people either buy into their vision as the only possibility, or desire a return to times before the personal computer.. The terms and concepts might as well be synonymous.

I was just typing out the big points laid out in the video, for those who don't have an hour to waste. This "reset" is not about factory resetting the world, but a permanent upgrade. Think of it like turning your old jeep into a Tesla...while you're still driving. And it's on fire. Somehow that scene from Transformers doesn't quite capture the magic. In a sentence, it's agenda 21 packaged as a covid recovery initiative with a shiny social justice bow on top. As the german guy said, the traditional systems and tools need to be adapted for the 21st century because apparently our current technology and society are too primitive for the modern human.

But I agree with you that this was inevitable, as we evolve to a type 1 civilization with full mastery and efficiency in using our resources without constant war and pollution and disease. Much like previous revolutions that changed manufacturing and society and philosophy, which I'm sure were also received with paranoia and hysteria, we will adapt and persevere.

a reply to: karl 12

Thanks for sharing this, I hadn't heard of Patrick Wood but he is good at explaining how the technocrats have infiltrated & influenced government and what we might expect to see in the decades ahead.

Great research and content here

originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
a reply to: olaru12

Overreaching socialism isn't much better. In fact, it's one of the tools to usher it in. Humans like safety. Humans get lazy when they living a good life.

Lazy humans like others to drag them through life. That's why in the current time, a social catching net is so looked after by the new generation, mostly my generation.

Not me though.

Well-said TDDA, I'm with you my friend. We are a minority though

a reply to: karl 12

Just finished that first video, wow! Great discussion and Patrick Wood has obviously done his research!

a reply to: karl 12

Yes indeed. It's all painfully detailed, albeit boring in Carroll Quigley's book "Tragedy and Hope."

Or the shorter version...
The Quigley Formula - fascinating lecture by G. Edward Griffin.

This idea & planning within Cecil Rhodes secret society of a circle within a circle within a circle and the Round Tables has roots back to Adam Weishaupt, Giuseppe Mazzini & Albert Pike.

Another interesting book is Pawns in the Game (1955) by William Guy Carr or listen to his Pawns in the Game Lecture (100 min)

Give you an idea of how some of these guys think from 150 years ago, Albert Pike (Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite's Freemasonry Southern Jurisdiction) wrote a letter to Giuseppe Mazzini, an Italian nationalist, politician, lawyer, journalist, activist for the unification of Italy and spearhead of the Italian revolutionary movement. Carr referred to Mazzini as the Director of the World Revolutionary movement.

ScreenCap from "Pawns in the Game" book, pg 11 (PDF version):


According to Karl Marx's "10 Planks" of the Communist Manifesto to seize power and destroy freedom: #5 reads: “Centralization of Credit in the Hands of the State, by Means of a National Bank with State Capital and an Exclusive Monopoly.”

When the Federal Reserve starts pushing for Fed Coin to align with Davos Agenda, you'll know what's up.

And let's not forget the Godfather & his guardians...

Vatican + "Guardians for Inclusive Capitalism" for clandestine communism.

This stuff is endless and deep, like an abyss (no wonder Quigley's book is over 1300 pages) but what all these globalist groups (CFR, Trilateral, Bilderberg, Davos crowd, Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka Chatham House, British equivalent and parent of our Council on Foreign Relations) have in common is Collectivism.

I think the war that is going on is the Global Financial Coup d’État, as established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement 56 (FASB 56).

FASB 56 basically said, We’re going to privatize the Treasury to an invisible committee that we don’t know who that is and they’re going to be able to create secret books by a process which is secret.

Apparently a group of secret people with a secret process, creating secret books and now, with the election fraud and the new Election Act, basically, they are saying is, the electorate doesn’t get to vote on who runs the Treasury. The Treasury has now gone private. IDK, but doubt the insanity has peaked, yet.




How much of the Globalist plan will succeed? Who knows but, better be prepared for a rocky road.

a reply to: FamCore
Hey FamCore

Just spotted your request and saw what you were doing. Respect, I will read your threads in the evening, very interesting viewpoints, I just skimmed a few but it's worth to take the time and read with much attention.

back to topic, yes its sad to know. take a peak at the english "harz4" page on wiki. introduced in 2003, it created an environment like "i get more money if i am on harz4, why should i work"

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow

The Quigley Formula - fascinating lecture by G. Edward Griffin.

Lots to digest there mate but that truly is a fascinating lecture and the extent to which the CFR has managed to infiltrate the corporate media is pretty mindblowing.

When it comes to Rockefeller CFR research then had to embed this one.

Sources

Especially considering the Rockefellers are heavily involved in 'eugenics', have 'profoundly shaped the WHO' and also own (in tandem with JP Morgan) over half of the pharmaceutical interests in the United States.

a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

Very well said mate and also agree with this snippet from your link:

The primary obstacle blocking the “sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers” is a strong, democratic, sovereign America. Both cannot exist simultaneously.

Further info here on that David Rockefeller quote - apparently it was made at the 1991 Bilderberg meeting and obtained by French intelligence agents tasked with monitoring the meeting.

Also certain statements at this link are well worth a read.

a reply to: TzarChasm

Yeah, the technocratic plan has been quite clearly outlined with Agenda21 and so-called "Sustainable Development Goals."

Due to the technology in play, I think we basically have three paths available to us; an absolute corporate global takeover (centralized path), decentralized adoption of the same concepts, or an AI takeover. "Government" would have more of a role if the bureaucracy had more awareness, but it currently serves as little more than a corporate proxy/puppet.

I wouldnt have as much doubt about Agenda 21 if it wasnt so duplicitous, disingenuous, and based in manipulation. It would have some positive aspects, but I believe will also precipitate a global folie a plusieurs due to the MindWar (which has already been forming).

My preference is using the main pillars of the revolution (automation, worldwide communication, & accessible creative tools) in our own homes. I suspect that this option has been highly obfuscated for a variety of reasons. Despite being my preference, since I feel it is a clearly super alternative for our civilization, there would be downsides. Even so, we would actually eliminate things like world hunger and colloquial "poverty." Im 100% biased given that I designed systems specifically for this. I also doubt that technocrats have truly examined the potential for their own benefit in decentralization and instead look at it merely as competition.

The last is a genuine AI takeover. Perhaps not a path that is "chosen" like the other two, but highly relevant in any path. Either way, we are building systems that are primed for a sentient network to take control. Obvious issues here, and most have no idea of the difference between automation and sentient AI.

The illusory option is akin to the Luddites. Desiring everything from elimination of social media to the possibility of EMPs. None will be effective, as global communication & computers are already embedded in our society and the authoritarian systems will be hardened. This will also be somewhat complemented by general, impotent resistance from discussions online to violent reaction. No actual alternatives will be provided here.

Should be fascinating to witness.. Will we choose global tyranny, repeating the same pattern as always? Will we choose the path that directly enables the vast pool of potential in our species, but removes control?

Outstandig post Serdgi, maybe there is a forth option that could serve as a kicker for one the first three to be initiated.

Something big, maybe prj. Bluebeam related or just a rock from space. No wonder TPTB need to drum up climate change and other things that they themselves are responsible for, but blame it on us.

originally posted by: Serdgiam
a reply to: TzarChasm

Yeah, the technocratic plan has been quite clearly outlined with Agenda21 and so-called "Sustainable Development Goals."

Due to the technology in play, I think we basically have three paths available to us; an absolute corporate global takeover (centralized path), decentralized adoption of the same concepts, or an AI takeover. "Government" would have more of a role if the bureaucracy had more awareness, but it currently serves as little more than a corporate proxy/puppet.

I wouldnt have as much doubt about Agenda 21 if it wasnt so duplicitous, disingenuous, and based in manipulation. It would have some positive aspects, but I believe will also precipitate a global folie a plusieurs due to the MindWar (which has already been forming).

My preference is using the main pillars of the revolution (automation, worldwide communication, & accessible creative tools) in our own homes. I suspect that this option has been highly obfuscated for a variety of reasons. Despite being my preference, since I feel it is a clearly super alternative for our civilization, there would be downsides. Even so, we would actually eliminate things like world hunger and colloquial "poverty." Im 100% biased given that I designed systems specifically for this. I also doubt that technocrats have truly examined the potential for their own benefit in decentralization and instead look at it merely as competition.

The last is a genuine AI takeover. Perhaps not a path that is "chosen" like the other two, but highly relevant in any path. Either way, we are building systems that are primed for a sentient network to take control. Obvious issues here, and most have no idea of the difference between automation and sentient AI.

The illusory option is akin to the Luddites. Desiring everything from elimination of social media to the possibility of EMPs. None will be effective, as global communication & computers are already embedded in our society and the authoritarian systems will be hardened. This will also be somewhat complemented by general, impotent resistance from discussions online to violent reaction. No actual alternatives will be provided here.

Should be fascinating to witness.. Will we choose global tyranny, repeating the same pattern as always? Will we choose the path that directly enables the vast pool of potential in our species, but removes control?

originally posted by: FamCore

I hadn't heard of Patrick Wood but he is good at explaining how the technocrats have infiltrated & influenced government and what we might expect to see in the decades ahead.

Yes mate quite an important history lesson and quite an intelligent (and brave) chap.

Didn't know about the 'Technocracy Incoporated' movement before and did find it relevant they got ejected from Canada for having too many similarities with the Nazi party.

Don't know about timelines either but some interesting speculation below about agendas - apparently "The challenge they have is how do you market a system that if people understood it nobody would want it".

Full Interview

Thought you made a great post here about the coordinated riots and federal bank locations by the way

originally posted by: Serdgiam
a reply to: TzarChasm

Yeah, the technocratic plan has been quite clearly outlined with Agenda21 and so-called "Sustainable Development Goals."

Due to the technology in play, I think we basically have three paths available to us; an absolute corporate global takeover (centralized path), decentralized adoption of the same concepts, or an AI takeover. "Government" would have more of a role if the bureaucracy had more awareness, but it currently serves as little more than a corporate proxy/puppet.

I wouldnt have as much doubt about Agenda 21 if it wasnt so duplicitous, disingenuous, and based in manipulation. It would have some positive aspects, but I believe will also precipitate a global folie a plusieurs due to the MindWar (which has already been forming).

My preference is using the main pillars of the revolution (automation, worldwide communication, & accessible creative tools) in our own homes. I suspect that this option has been highly obfuscated for a variety of reasons. Despite being my preference, since I feel it is a clearly super alternative for our civilization, there would be downsides. Even so, we would actually eliminate things like world hunger and colloquial "poverty." Im 100% biased given that I designed systems specifically for this. I also doubt that technocrats have truly examined the potential for their own benefit in decentralization and instead look at it merely as competition.

The last is a genuine AI takeover. Perhaps not a path that is "chosen" like the other two, but highly relevant in any path. Either way, we are building systems that are primed for a sentient network to take control. Obvious issues here, and most have no idea of the difference between automation and sentient AI.

The illusory option is akin to the Luddites. Desiring everything from elimination of social media to the possibility of EMPs. None will be effective, as global communication & computers are already embedded in our society and the authoritarian systems will be hardened. This will also be somewhat complemented by general, impotent resistance from discussions online to violent reaction. No actual alternatives will be provided here.

Should be fascinating to witness.. Will we choose global tyranny, repeating the same pattern as always? Will we choose the path that directly enables the vast pool of potential in our species, but removes control?

The ultimate conclusion to the map of probability you outlined is that we will eventually discard our humanity as it is currently defined. Homo sapiens will be discontinued as an "obsolete model". it is not a matter of if, but when. When will the technology be available, when will society be persuaded to accept that permanent "upgrade" and when will the last true human die. These are the questions that will frame the future of our species.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow

I think the war that is going on is the Global Financial Coup d’État, as established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement 56 (FASB 56).

Won't pretend to fully comprehend the content (but know a man who will) - thanks for posting this.



As for the 'great reset' rebrand did see a few familiar aspects in this article authored in April 1944.

The technocrats’ proposal has three planks:

• Conscription of all men and women, 18 to 65, with all workers placed under a militarily-organized “technological command” coordinate with the Army and Navy.
 

• “National direction” of all industrial and commercial facilities.
 

• Suspension of all corporate and “ordinary” commercial operations, including the suspension of dividends, profits, taxes, etc.

Paul Temple. A Totalitarian Fantasy — Technocracy, Fascism, and the War (April 1944)

a reply to: karl 12

But there are only 24 branches/banks? How can there be 34 per his post?

a reply to: karl 12

What sucks is that if they hold your purse strings then they can do whatever they want. If the only options are starve to death because you only want to use cash, or get chipped so you can buy food, it's hard to argue with that. Especially when they control the police and military.

originally posted by: chris_stibrany

But there are only 24 branches/banks? How can there be 34 per his post?

Here are the details from the transcript Chris - will try to source the grid map.

So I said to the wonderful team-mate who was building this, I said, ‘Do me a favour. I want you to put a box called ‘the Federal Reserve’. And I want you to check the box, there are 12 banks, one headquarters and then the branches, for a total of 37 locations. I want you to check the box wherever in . . . in any city where we have a branch or a bank or the headquarters, I want a check.’ And what we discovered is 34 of the 37 bank locations have riots. And I said, ‘Well, wait a minute, that’s a pattern.’ (laughs) There’s something here. Let’s drill down.’ So we started with Minneapolis and we said, ‘Let’s take the data of all the buildings that were harmed or burned, or businesses and we’ll map it. You know, we’ll do a GIS software and we’ll map where these businesses were and how close they were to the Federal Reserve Bank.’ And so the first thing one did, there’s a . . . there’s a street going across Minneapolis called Lake. And we map them. And one of the things we did when we mapped them was we drew pictures of where the opportunity zones were. Do you know what an opportunity zone is? An opportunity zone is a tax shelter mechanism created in 2018 to help the tech billionaires, as they sold their stock, avoid capital gains. So you can . . . if you’re Jeff Bezos, who sold $10billion of stock this year, if you were to roll over your proceeds into opportunity zone investments and handle it in a certain way, you could avoid all capital gains tax. So this is fantastically profitable. Now, if you look at the riots, when I first saw how all the buildings and businesses destroyed along Lake Street were right at the bottom of the opportunity, I started to laugh and I said, you know, ‘I was Assistant Secretary of Housing. That’s not a riot pattern. That’s a real estate acquisition plan.’

Big Tech are very afraid of this woman

Cheers.

a reply to: karl 12

I respect her a lot, and I think I didnt realise that the branches are separate from the main banks when I was counting. duh

en.wikipedia.org...

Looks like 37

originally posted by: Serdgiam

Should be fascinating to witness.

You can already see it in action here mate.

Enslavement into the digital panopticon and weaponizing of data.

No wonder Rothschild, Soros, Rockefeller, Kissenger, Brzezinski etc were gushing about China so much.

a reply to: karl 12

Nah..

Stuff like that might be a bit outside the mainstream Narrative, but it isnt to the extent Im talking about.

As they say, "you aint seen nothin yet!"

As TzarChasm stated so well, we are talking about massive shifts to our civilization and species here.

China may be the teacher's pet, so to speak, but in the technocrats attempts to re-establish technological feudalism.. Something much different will be born that is outside of all of our control (including theirs).

For that path, the biggest question I have is whether it will be automation or true AI. Many dont really know the difference, but a future where mindless automation and algorithms reign supreme is.. horrific. And by that, I mean actually reign versus being merely ubiquitous.

My own vision and preference is quite different. While some may criticize me for being heavily influenced by everything from Star Trek to Iain Banks Culture series, I believe we frequently shape our future through fiction.

In other words, I firmly believe there are other options.. but its a choice we are making collectively as a species.