posted on Mar, 21 2005 @ 03:51 PM
I don't think that the agenda is necessarily get rid of abortion. By extension the most they can do is say 'we protected schiavo, we will protect
the unborn', which really isn't saving much. I can only see them possibly being able to say 'we protected the parent's rights by keeping schiavo
alive, therefore, if, say, the father doesn't want an abortion, then there can't be one, or if the mother's parents don't want one, then there
can't be one', but thats a stretch again, and also the court's not going to decide a no-brainer (pun) like that; obviously her parent's have no
say in the matter.
I think that they've merely decided that they look good by 'protecting' the vegetable, not that they can kill abortion by it.