It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

SCOTUS refuses to review Pennsylvania election cases.

page: 1
9
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 09:49 AM
link   
It appears the alleged wrongdoing of stealing an election has a
drop-dead date for prosecution.
In a non-decision, the SCOTUS has refused to hear the Pennsylvania
election fraud 'story'... and pretty much shut down all recourse to
overturning the 2020 election . Short of a full military takeover,
which would be most amusing: especially for the salivating globalists.
Here's the relevant article as I first snagged it:
www.jurist.org...
I wonder who's going to get the little gold-plated guy for
'Best Actor in a Delayed Let-Down' ? My money's on Lin Wood. He
looks to get the most airtime counter suing Dominatroid.
Yeah, minimal post. No pictures please and I also don't care
to be first with news this sucky.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 09:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: derfreebie
... and pretty much shut down all recourse to
overturning the 2020 election .


Even if they decided to hear this they stated in their denial that it would not change the outcome of the election.




edit on 22-2-2021 by AugustusMasonicus because: I'm a Q-Cumber posting from the future



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 09:55 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I think that ship sailed a while back, but it sure would be swell if we could look at some of the complaints, and see of anything is real, or should be fixed before the next farce election.
edit on 22-2-2021 by network dude because: why can't I shovel my roof. Oh yea, I don't have any SNOW!!!!!



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

This was a case addressing whether State Supreme Courts can enforce voter access portions of their respective State Constitutions when it comes to election law passed by the Legislature. This had nothing to do with fraud since there weren't any fraud cases ever submitted to the Supreme Court.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I think that ship sailed a while back, but it sure would be swell if we could look at some of the complaints, and see of anything is real, or should be fixed before the next farce election.


Maybe the wake-up call has gone out to the max available
lightbulbs already, space.... I think by this point we could be
dealing with almost all burned-out bulbs or power grid dropouts.
"If the government WERE responsible...
would you really want to know?" Stephen Rea, From V



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:06 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

what was alleged is that the election rules were changed, and not by the correct people as per the stated constitution. It should be pretty easy to deal with, it's either true, or it's not, I think it's been proven true, so the only thing left I suppose is does the PA state constitution mean anything at all. It may not, I don't live there, so it's not a thing for me.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie

The reaction to this event, and those that preceded it, may not be immediate, but it will most surely come. The direction that reaction will take is a huge


Cheers



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
what was alleged is that the election rules were changed, and not by the correct people as per the stated constitution.


That's what I said, however the Justices said it would not alter the election outcome.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: network dude
what was alleged is that the election rules were changed, and not by the correct people as per the stated constitution.


That's what I said, however the Justices said it would not alter the election outcome.


Yep, the election is over, and even if Joey stole it, he's there. I think they need to be quite careful about how much truth they let out on this. If they do find that it should have gone the other way, and as we all know, the end result won't change, there may be more than a LARP going on.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:13 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Well, the reality is the votes in question were segregated as per the Court's instructions and never counted to begin with, hence the reason nothing would change.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie

This was discussed before the election back in October.

Was it brought to them again?

I would see no reason for them to review the case now, if they refused it before.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie

So, by a vote of 6 to 3...SCOTUS doesn't even want to deal with the evidence?
edit on 22-2-2021 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So, by a vote of 6 to 3...SCOTUS doesn't even want to deal with the evidence?


There wasn't any evidence, it was a Constitutional argument that was rendered moot as the votes weren't counted to begin with and would not have impacted the Pennsylvania election if they were needed.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:35 AM
link   
So be it..this now gives the Republicans permission to vote as many times as necessary to ensure a win in 2022..vote often and in multiple states and register as Democrat so they can't target your vote. The republic has fallen and will take extreme measures to "take" it back.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: whatnext21

Or you could try to understand the actual legal argument in the brief and not be melodramatic.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:38 AM
link   
*laughs in CCP*



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
I don't live there, so it's not a thing for me.


Massive cheating in one state effects everyone in the country.

Had there not been mass cheating in PA, MI and GA, we would have a different President right now.

This is why the Texas case should have been taken by the S.Ct. - all voters across the US were harmed by this nonsense.

Also factor in, now that they know they can get away with it, it will spread across the country and seep down into more local elections.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: LanceCorvette

Except the Pennsylvania case wasn't about cheating as you already know.



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: LanceCorvette

Lance, as your posting signature goes, 'yep'.

The consequences of this decision will be profound.

Cheers



posted on Feb, 22 2021 @ 10:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: derfreebie

The reaction to this event, and those that preceded it, may not be immediate, but it will most surely come. The direction that reaction will take is a huge


Cheers


I've made a conscious decision to check out of the process.

I'll probably never vote again - why bother?

I'm also looking to reduce my exposure to the fed through decreasing my annual tax tribute to them.

The plan now is to lay low, live my best life, and that's it.

"Freedom" is not the natural state for most of humanity or human history.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join