If You Trust The Official Word From Government On Anything You Are A Gullible F**L

Don't know W.H.O. to trust these days especially the goaltenders 😃

I trust my family and friends who are either treating this disease, or have had it. They are the most cautious people I know.

I have my Ivermectin.

originally posted by: Phage
This kit has been evaluated for use with human specimen material only.

I don't give a $417 what their disclaimer says ... to me it looks like it defaults to a positive result?

Pick your fights better, Phage. This kind makes a wreck of your credibility.

Another dumb question from FCD (2nd one today)...

What is..."F**L"?

I've been acronym-ed to death in my life, and now I just ask...sorry.

a reply to: Snarl

I don't give a $417 what their disclaimer says ... to me it looks like it defaults to a positive result?

So, nothing but positives? Seems that would be problematic. Don't you think?

And rapid antigen tests are not the same as PCR tests which are what this thread is supposed to be about.

originally posted by: Phage
And rapid antigen tests are not the same as PCR tests which are what this thread is supposed to be about.

PCR tests are susceptible to bad lab practices, Phage. Why do you keep on keeping on?

a reply to: Snarl

PCR tests are susceptible to bad lab practices, Phage

Obviously. Did I say otherwise?

The OP claims that the WHO has changed their standards very recently. This is false.

The recommendations have not changed since September, at least.

Careful interpretation of weak positive NAAT results is needed, as some of the assays have shown to produce false signals at high Ct values. When test results turn out to be invalid or questionable, the patient should be resampled and retested. If additional samples from the patient are not available, RNA should be re-extracted from the original samples and retested by highly experienced staff. Results can be confirmed by an alternative NAAT test or via virus sequencing if the viral load is sufficiently high. Laboratories are urged to seek reference laboratory confirmation of any unexpected results.

apps.who.int...

a reply to: Phage

First, because they are wearing white coats, they are doctors?

Not necessarily doctors , but at least lab technicians who have to report their findings to doctors.
You didn't know that ?

a reply to: Gothmog

The titles in the video say they are doctors.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Gothmog

The titles in the video say they are doctors.

They may still be.
Have you checked with each ?

I trust science yaaaaaaa!

pic]ne600ca551.png[/pic]

a reply to: Gothmog

Nope. I just asked a question about the video. Since the video is so stupid, it wouldn't surprise me if the "doctors" aren't. But it doesn't really matter since the video is so stupid and doesn't apply to the thread in the first place.

All it proves is that the rapid antigen test doesn't work on fruit. Big deal.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Don't be too harsh on FCD.
When I first posted, I had it, "F***" and changed it just a minute or 2 later.

a reply to: Phage

Nope. I just asked a question about the video.

Then , you admit not knowing.

All it proves is that the rapid antigen test doesn't work on fruit.

There are a lot of "fruits" in the world .

Denying ignorance.
Why ?
It has got to be.

a reply to: Gothmog

And those from New Zealand are kiwis.

a reply to: CharlesT

I read that article a while back in European agencies, I think it might have been let out by BMJ. They ignored that here in this country but it is relevant. They did not accept that here and it is not real till it is accepted by the proper agencies. Now they can change their practices after the vaccines get injected and show a decline in the rate of covid cases, then they will brag how well the vaccine works. They can also lower the sensitivity and they do not have to say they lowered the repetitions because us mushrooms have no right to know that kind of stuff. So people will start to die from other diseases after that instead of calling them covid deaths.

Just keep your mouth shut so they do not label you as a bad person who is an anti-vaxer, because they will have penalties for anyone who talks someone out of a vaccine in the future and they die, you might be charged with manslaughter if the person dies. Just give the facts and never tell anyone not to take the shot, or you could get in trouble. Start changing your behavior or you can wind up being put in jail.

It’s pretty wild all the non covid news we are talking about considering covid is the most important story of the century. The timing of this was too sloppy and revealing.

They are getting lazy.

a reply to: CharlesT