It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

earthquake off coast of southern Japan, tsunami warning issued

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 19 2005 @ 09:14 PM
link   
10:13 PM EST Mar 19
TOKYO (AP) - A powerful earthquake rattled southern Japanese on Sunday, swaying buildings and prompting warnings of tsunami.

There were no immediate reports of damage or injuries.

The magnitude 7 quake, which hit off the coast of Kyushu Island at 10:53 a.m. local time, was centred at an "extremely shallow" depth below the ocean floor, the Japanese Meteorological Agency said.

The agency cautioned residents near the water to flee to higher ground




posted on Mar, 19 2005 @ 09:24 PM
link   
Wow. could be a big story. You should consider cleaning it up a bit and posting it on ATSNN.



posted on Mar, 19 2005 @ 09:26 PM
link   
Here's a link to a reuters news story to use for a source.
www .reuters.com

I agree, you should submit it.



posted on Mar, 19 2005 @ 09:32 PM
link   
was this a Mag 7.0 or what was it?

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Mar, 19 2005 @ 09:34 PM
link   
My understanding of what I read was that Japan uses a slightly different scale than most. Richter may have had it at 7.0 and the Japanese scale at a low 6.

My info is based off of what I read in the reiters story.



posted on Mar, 19 2005 @ 09:36 PM
link   
And they say "off coast" and "shallow"...
My sources both said in the middle of the island and deep (33 km)

hmmm...

EDIT:
Hey wait... the EMSC page went down (they reported 33km) and USGS now says 10 km...

Tsunami?? It´s the middle of the island...

external image

...and now they changed their mind (still on the island though...)

external image

[edit on 2005/3/19 by Hellmutt]



posted on Mar, 19 2005 @ 09:37 PM
link   
Yeah, I see that. Well at least the region appears to be the same. Is it possible there was 2?

EDIT: Well, no the times appear to match.

[edit on 3/19/2005 by phreak_of_nature]



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join