It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Okay, you think it's a crime. I offer the above and my previous statements about why I disagree. Aside from "I said so" is there a law you think applies?
originally posted by: carewemust
Over the past week, mainstream media nutjobs defended BLM activist-leader John Sullivan as a helpful videographer at the Capitol, during the unrest on January 6th.
This afternoon John Sullivan was arrested for inciting violence.
mobile.twitter.com...
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Okay, you think it's a crime. I offer the above and my previous statements about why I disagree. Aside from "I said so" is there a law you think applies?
If you don't think they should be charged why are they getting charged with Federal felonies?
Hint: Because they broke Federal laws.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
They all broke Federal law by being there? I wasn't aware the trials had happened. Are we doing trials anymore or just guilt by extrajudicial decree?
Who has been charged so far based solely on the evidence that they were present?
Sweet had been named in a Jan. 7 arrest warrant, accused of entering or remaining in a restricted building and knowingly intending to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of government business.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
twitter.com...
BREAKING: CNN’s Jade Sacker penetrating the Capitol with a member of BLM/Antifa cheering, “We did it!” And then asking her conspirator if he was filming, he said he’d delete it, he lied. CNN was in on it.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
They all broke Federal law by being there? I wasn't aware the trials had happened. Are we doing trials anymore or just guilt by extrajudicial decree?
Being arrested for breaking Federal law and being convicted of breaking Federal law are two different things.
Who has been charged so far based solely on the evidence that they were present?
The 'Camp Auschwitz' jackass for one:
Sweet had been named in a Jan. 7 arrest warrant, accused of entering or remaining in a restricted building and knowingly intending to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of government business.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Ksihkehe
Another strawman. I never said he was arrested for being in a photo, I said he was arrested for breaking Federal law.
Them allowing retards in and the retards going in are BOTH illegal.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
The post before I asked "Who has been charged so far based solely on the evidence that they were present?"