Twitter trolls us again

I love these right wing echo chambers.

So, you’re fine with the internet being censored?

Of course you are, lol.

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
I love these right wing echo chambers.

So, you’re fine with the internet being censored?

Of course you are, lol.

Says the person celebrating leftists censoring.

lolz

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
I love these right wing echo chambers.

So, you’re fine with the internet being censored?

Of course you are, lol.

That’s literally the opposite of the argument being made here.

When did Twitter become an ISP?

FWIW, I’m sure more than a few Twitter employees at least smirked when that post was being discussed.

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
I love these right wing echo chambers.

So, you’re fine with the internet being censored?

Of course you are, lol.

That's what you took from this?
Wow

At least one website picked up on it. Too rich.

While Twitter testified to their transparency with regard to foreign elections, they could say no such thing about their actions in the American process. Twitter's bold actions in deleting free speech and interfering in elections despite their stated intentions of helping could be seen as human rights violations. Twitter is a company, not an elections board.

TECHBASED: Government of Uganda Bans Twitter From Country After Censorship, Election Interference

The government of Uganda has disabled Twitter within its borders for election interference, days after oligarch Jack Dorsey took initiative to suspend accounts supportive of President Yoweri Museveni.

So Twitter was interfering, got banned, now they have something to say..

a reply to: Arizona2

This is sort of the like "Democracy dies in darkness" leftist doublespeak.

a reply to: Cobaltic1978
Theres that primative racism again.

You see censorship where that's not the topic, you see activism when censorship happens.

originally posted by: AutomateThis1
What gets me is that apparently politicians can't block people they don't like because that is a violation of the first amendment, but Twitter blocking politicians from speaking isn't a violation of the first amendment.

Ya, it’s because they are a “private company”.

I wonder how it would go over if grocery stores and gas stations in a predominantly Republican (not RINO) town refused to sell food and fuel to minority Dems?

They are private companies after all.

(Not that I condone stooping to their level of treating people worse than animals)

originally posted by: Drucifer
When did Twitter become an ISP?

FWIW, I’m sure more than a few Twitter employees at least smirked when that post was being discussed.

They had to, and how could they not marvel at the sheer irony, and hypocrisy..it's Olympic level!!!

Someone took notice

Tucker Carlson pours on.

video

His team thought it might be trolling as well, had to double check.

The sad thing, there is an audience who eats it up and sees Twitter as the righteous defender of democracy policing all global speech for the good...

a reply to: Arizona2

No one posted a link to the comments on twitter, some of the best if you need a good laugh today.

Giphy really shines in moments like this. If only we could get people to quit posting those disturbing clown gifs...

They are in the minority of the comments, but to answer the OP, the SWJ dont see the irony. They know best, just like the ballot stuffers.

Twitter Public Policy
@Policy
Ahead of the Ugandan election, we're hearing reports that Internet service providers are being ordered to block social media and messaging apps.

We strongly condemn internet shutdowns – they are hugely harmful, violate basic human rights and the principles of the #OpenInternet.