a reply to:
ThatDamnDuckAgain
The natural mechanism could also produce a degenerate eveolutionary stage. Degenerate in relationship to the former evolutionary step. It' all
relative to each other.
So you mean 'degenerate to a previous condition'? Change is change (and change is time). The hand of time moves in one direction (in human experience)
and one direction only. If a grandchild looks exactly like his grandfather, he has not become his grandfather. Even in the unlikely (statistically
extraordinarily unlikely but not 100.00000000000000000000000000000000000000...% impossible) that DNA was changed from Grandfather to Father and then
miraculously, every one of those DNA changes was somehow changed back to the exact Grandfather state in the Grandson - the Grandson is STILL the
Grandson, NOT the Grandfather. And the grandson is different from his father. 'Degenerate' is an inappropriate loaded word. The correct word is
'change'.
You are correct about it all being relative to each other, though. Grandfather -> change -> Father -> change -> Grandson. There is a change in the
father's DNA RELATIVE to the grandfather's DNA. There is a change in the grandson's DNA RELATIVE to the father's DNA. There is always change from
generation to generation. If that results in the DNA state changing to a state that has already been 'seen' in the ancestors, it is still a change
from one generation to the next, not a reversion or going backwards - there is no backwards, just next.
Imagine a lioness is born with a better set of muscle groups. Whatever the reason. These muscles are stronger than her fellow lioness muscles
but they need way more energy. On first look, the muscles are a great new feature, just that the lioness collapses and dies in the sun before it could
bear puppies (you meant cubs) because it overheated at some point and the environment didn't allow follow up evolutionary changes
like a intrinsic warning system for the lioness that she is overheating quickly.
On the other hand, if she has better muscles she might just be able to out hunt her non-mutated colleagues and have no trouble with chasing them away
from the shady spots and watering holes.
But what you describe is exactly the point of natural selection and how it operates. As you describe, this mutation was not beneficial to that
population of lions, mutations are not always good, they are not always bad, they are more often than not completely neutral. Natural selection has
filtered out that non-beneficial mutation.
If the mutation had occurred in a population of lions that lived in a cooler climate perhaps she would not have died in the sun, her well muscled
offspring may have come to dominate the population and she may have been the progenitor of an eventual new species. Note that she, herself, is not a
new species, nor are her children or children's children. But if her descendants don't mix back into a warm climate population then maybe it would
eventually be different enough (after many more mutations) to be called a new species.
I disagree, nothing is random. That does not mean we can not influence the system or environment but it isn't random. No thoughts are random, that's a
huge misconception.
We are not talking about 'random thoughts' even if I do disagree with you on that point. We are talking about changes in DNA.
Changes that occur in a cell when it divides are random. The mutation IS random, there is no direction, no controlling influence that decides what
mutation will occur in the DNA state. There are 'rules' about WHAT mutations are possible, but not about WHICH of the possible mutations actually
occur.
I challenge you to find me one example that is proven random. Just one example.
The proof you want to find here is probably above my pay grade and I'm not going down that rabbit hole. But I will provide a possible minor example of
a random event.
1) Go to a large library with a friend, but don't tell the friend what you are doing.
2) Blind fold yourself.
3) Have a friend ask a stranger in the library to pick a number larger than zero and less than 61.
4) Have a friend go off and browse the library for that number of minutes.
5) Have the friend select a book, magazine, document or whatever during their browse and have them come back to you with it.
6) Pick a page from the document or book or magazine and put your finger down somewhere (you are still blindfolded).
7) If you have not put your finger on a map location, repeat steps 1 through 6 with a different friend until you have found a location on a map.
8) Now you have a map location go to that location in the real world. Ask any stranger there where there is a beach or simply a large pile of sand
nearby. Do this three times or until you have three different sandy spots.
9) Ask a fourth stranger to pick a number, one, two, or three.
10) Use that number to select which sandy spot to use.
11) Have a friend blindfold you and take you to the selected sandy spot.
12) Have the friend sit you down on the sandy spot and spin you around a couple of times on the spot.
13) Stand up. Sit down. Standup turn around a bit. Sit down.
14) Grab a handful of sand.
15) Drop the handful of sand - do not wipe off any grains of sand that happen to stick to your hand.
16) Pick up another handful of sand with your other hand, and then drop it again.
17) Rub your hands together to shake of most of the sticking grains.
18) If there are now no grains of sand sticking to either hand, repeat steps 13 to 17 until you have at least one grain still stuck to your hand.
19) You are still blindfolded, but find one grain of sand on one of your hands and pick it up with a finger.
You have now
RANDOMLY selected one grain of sand from all the grains of sand in existence.
Notice that that algorithm is rather strictly defined - that is the methodology to find that grain is absolutely not random (silly, yes, but not
random) - but there is absolutely no way to have predicted which specific grain of sand you would choose and there is no way that you could reproduce
the exact outcome by following the algorithm again.
While there is a finite (but extremely large) number ways that a chromosome can be affected by a mutation, exactly which mutation occurs is completely
random. And there are ALWAYS changes from one generation to the next. ALWAYS.
edit on 10/1/2021 by rnaa because: grammar, clarification
edit on 10/1/2021 by rnaa because: (no reason given)