Thanks for bumping this thread. Its important to be aware of when fanatics hijack the national discourse.
A recent example is
Karl Rove's attack on "liberals"--and I put "liberals" in
quotations because in Rove's red and blue world of divisive partisan politics (as per his
speech last week), a liberal is anyone that disagrees with the President. It's
"you're either with us, or against us" all over again.
But who are the "us" he is refering to? He speaks about "liberals"--specifically those that "saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to
prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers." Considering that in 2001 and 2002,
90% of the country supported the attack on Afghanistan, Rove is weaving tall revisionist history
tales to suit his fanatical bent.
It is interesting to note that in late 2001 through 2002, when the savagery of 9/11 was fresh in the minds of liberals, conservatives,
independents--all Americans, every
poll showed overwhelmingly strong support for war with Iraq.
An ABC News poll in 11/01 indicated that 78% of the country favored military action. Of course, at that time over 70% of the country also believed
that Saddam Hussein was directly involved in flying planes into buildings and had stockpiles of WMDs too.
Considering that by November '04, over 56 million patriotic Americans exercizing their Democratic responsibility expressed their dissatisfaction with
George Bush and according to
recent polls conducted by AP/Ipsos, Zogby, CNN/USA Today/Gallup, CBS
News/NYTimes, Harris, Gallup (independent), ABC News/Washington Post, NBC News/Wall St. Journal, and Time, the majority of the country now believes
that invading Iraq was a mistake, has served to worsen our long-term security, and was not worth the loss of human life or financial cost, Rove and
those who rushed to defend his remarks are clearly outside the mainstream.
Also, I would say that one would have to be quite the lunatic to give a speech, especially in New York where we are known to lean to the left, and say
that after watching the Twin Towers crumble, liberals wanted to send terrorists to therapy.
As a liberal and a New Yorker that didn't need a television to watch the towers fall, I can tell you that Rove doesn't speak for me or anyone I
know--especially the families of my friends who died that day. I can also tell you it will be a cold day in hell before Rove is welcomed back in
NYC.
But even if his comments are classless and incendiary, this does expose Rove and those that support him as extremists. The only purpose of his brand
of Manichean value system is to create friction and to compel people to pick a side.
Reminds me of a quote that I read in Avlon's "Independent Nation"...
"Far right kooks are just like the nuts on the left; they're doorbell ringers and balloon blowers, but they turn out to vote. There is only
one thing as bad as a far-right liberal, and that's a damn right-wing conservative."
Ironically, that was Richard M. Nixon, author of Karl Rove's playbook. If anyone knew how to manipulate the silent majority, it was Nixon.
Interesting to note that Rove's first mentor was Nixon's chief political strategist, Donald Segretti... who wound up in prison as part of the
Watergate scandal.