Wow! I don't even know what to do about this flurry of responses.
I will start by saying this clearly indicates a problem with discipline in the home. That's the first thought I had upon reading the story.
Secondly, all things considered, the primary goal of the cops once they showed up should have been to talk to the girl. They're trained in conflict
resolution, and the teachers are supposed to be well versed in this area as well.
Now, we can assume they tried and failed, or we can assume they didn't try at all. I think either assumption assumes too much.
Like usual, we don't have enough information to make accurate judgements. I'd like to give the cops and the teacher the benefit of the doubt, but
given my prior experience with lazy, petulant adults, it wouldn't surprise me to find that they didn't have the patience to deal with the girl.
Now, I agree that the problem originated at home, and not in the school, but the school had to deal with it, and that's where restraint comes in.
I think the cops were just trying to prevent her from hurting herself. If they had grabbed her by the shoulders or the waist, and she kept flailing,
she could easily have dislocated her own shoulder or broken a wrist or ankle bone. Then the cops would be facing an even bigger lawsuit and greater
public outrage.
Is this a case of the lesser of two evils? Forced into a difficult position, the cops chose the option least likely to injure the child, and I think
that was probably a good decision.
They could have bear hugged her, but then they risk breaking ribs, and serious internal injury. They might even be charged with molestation, seeing
how litigious our society has become. The cops were in a really uncomfortable situation, and in my opinon they shouldn't have been there to have to
deal with this.
My main question is why the police were called in the first place? The police shouldn't be necessary to discipline children this young. They were
never called to my school, and I was a trouble maker..let me tell you.
When I was six, I got mad at my teacher for stopping me from writing and making me take a nap. I didn't want to take a nap, she insisted. Well, I
retaliated not by hitting, but by climbing on top of the bookshelf and spitting at her like bawdy little monkeys do. hmmm.. Not my proudest moment,
I'll admit. My only defense is..I was six.
Now, to the teacher's credit she tried to coax me down, and when that was unsuccessful she didn't call in the swat team, helicopters were not
deployed, she simply buzzed the principal (this was before the era of security guards in schools mind you).

The principal came in, got up on a
chair, and dragged me down. He made me sit in his office and wait for my parents. I don't remember the details, but I'm fairly sure I never
punched him in the stomach.
Now, as an adult, I've been beaten up by kids. They hit hard! They fight dirty! As I speak, there are young children running wild in the street
outside my house, taking turns calling each other "asshole."
There's obviously a very dramatic shift in the direction of lawlessness when it comes to children. I don't know if it's because parents can't hit
their children anymore, or if because parents are too busy to provide counseling, or what. I suspect that the fact is parents spend less time with
their children than ever before, and as such, the children have no idea how to behave.