It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Okay, so what happens now?
This last week has started to see the façade crumble away from the wars. Gone is the comfortable fraud, leaving in its wake a very stark and harsh reality.
The Carnegie Report affirmed that there had never been a military threat from Iraq, no weapons of mass destruction were poised just 45 minutes away to strike at hearth and home. The last-second discovery of a few dozen rusted out warheads from 10 years ago only underscored that the desperate attempt to find weapons of mass destruction to retroactively justify the war in Iraq had failed, and failed miserably.
The Carnegie Report came hard on the heels of Paul Bremer’s comments that claims of underground WMDs labs having been found in Iraq were a total fiction. Paul was apparently unaware that Prime Minister Tony Blair was the author of the aforesaid claims.
This was followed by a startling admission by Colin Powell that there was no evidence that linked Iraq or Saddam Hussein with Al Qaeda. This admission was startling because it was Colin Powell himself who nearly a year ago was assuring the world of the exact opposite, that Iraq was supporting and arming Al Qaeda.
A last-ditch attempt to explain the absence of WMDs in Iraq by claiming that Syria now had them was torpedoed by no less a personage than National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice, who admitted for the record that there was no evidence at all that Iraq had sent WMDs to Syria, a reasonable conclusion now that it is apparent that Iraq did not have WMDs at all.
Virtually EVERY intelligence agency worldwide "knew" Iraq had WMD. Clearly upon review, it was a blanket failure of intelligence worldwide.
The pre-war report of Hans Blix, given on January 27 1993, notes that 2,000 chemical rocket warheads remained unaccounted for, that documents provided by the Iraqis themselves contradict their claims never to have produced VX, and that 8,500 liters of biological weapons agent also remained unaccounted for. Thus, even ignoring the now-much criticized reports from the Central Intelligence Agency and British intelligence, we know that a large amount of WMD weaponry existed in Iraq during Saddam Hussein's rule.
The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.
The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission briefed the Security Council on new findings that could help trace the whereabouts of Saddam's missile and WMD program.
The pre-war report of Hans Blix, given on January 27 1993, notes that 2,000 chemical rocket warheads remained unaccounted for, that documents provided by the Iraqis themselves contradict their claims never to have produced VX, and that 8,500 liters of biological weapons agent also remained unaccounted for. Thus, even ignoring the now-much criticized reports from the Central Intelligence Agency and British intelligence, we know that a large amount of WMD weaponry existed in Iraq during Saddam Hussein's rule.
as posted by Jakomo
How about you start with 3 countries other than the US and UK that claimed to know that Iraq had WMD?
March 7, 2003-American U-2 and French Mirage surveillance aircraft already give us valuable imagery,
As I noted on 14 February, intelligence authorities have claimed that weapons of mass destruction are moved around Iraq by trucks and, in particular, that there are mobile production units for biological weapons…No evidence of proscribed activities have so far been found.
Nevertheless, intelligence agencies have expressed the view that proscribed programmes have continued or restarted in this period. It is further contended that proscribed programmes and items are located in underground facilities,
February 14, 2003-We are fully aware that many governmental intelligence organizations are convinced and assert that proscribed weapons, items and programmes continue to exist. The US Secretary of State presented material in support of this conclusion. Governments have many sources of information that are not available to inspectors. Inspectors, for their part, must base their reports only on evidence, which they can, themselves, examine and present publicly. Without evidence, confidence cannot arise.
Originally posted by Jakomo
The US Government lied to start the war in Iraq. The whole world knows that now. And more to the point, the whole world knows that Americans know that the US Government lied to start the war in Iraq. The world is now watching to see what the people of the United States will do.
Originally posted by AlphaHumana
We went to war in Iraq for many different reasons, and the world is beginning to reap the rewards of our efforts.
The Bush administration made plans for war and for Iraq's oil before the 9/11 attacks, sparking a policy battle between neo-cons and Big Oil, BBC's Newsnight has revealed.
Originally posted by AlphaHumana
If the government lied about WMDs, why didn't they plant some or simply lie that they'd found them.
We knew he had chemical weapons, because he used them.
Additionally, some were found - the rest are sitting in Syria atm.
At any rate, we were not lied to if you believe the case for WMDs was mistaken, it was simply because the world's governments were wrong, not lying.
Anyway, Saddam was a threat to the free world and region regardless if he had WMDs. This guy loved war, violence. Not just used it, he loved it.
It doesn't take brilliance to see the trend of recent developments in the middle east spurred by US action in Afghanistan and Iraq. Elections in Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia (to an extent.), Syria is withdrawing from Lebanon, there is unrest inside Syria itself. Libya has given up its nuclear ambition, and Egypt is reforming its election procedure, and Jordan is making more and more steps towards open democracy. People see their neighbors prospering outside of repressive regimes and they think 'hey, that looks like a pretty sweet deal."
We went to war in Iraq for many different reasons, and the world is beginning to reap the rewards of our efforts. Iraq was a threat, WMDs or not.
Originally posted by uknumpty
Originally posted by AlphaHumana
We went to war in Iraq for many different reasons, and the world is beginning to reap the rewards of our efforts.
Nope. The US and UK went to Iraq to sit on the oil. Greg Palast reporting for BBC's Newsnight and Harper's magazine has exposed the Secret US plans for Iraq's oil.
The Bush administration made plans for war and for Iraq's oil before the 9/11 attacks, sparking a policy battle between neo-cons and Big Oil, BBC's Newsnight has revealed.