It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ivanka Trump questioned under oath in lawsuit over use of inauguration funds

page: 1
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 08:59 PM
link   
Another one!

Ivanka Trump questioned under oath in lawsuit over use of inauguration funds - Reuters

Nothing for years and then the proverbial fecal matter hits the rotary air motion inducer.

With the "pay for pardon" investigation as well, this makes three investigations in the last 48 hours.

From the article: "Ivanka Trump, the president’s daughter and adviser, was questioned under oath this week as part of a civil lawsuit alleging misuse of nonprofit funds for Donald Trump’s inauguration four years ago".

edit on 2/12/2020 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:07 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Nothing for years?
You mean nothing that was manufactured for years by the Dems ever stuck.
Let me put a nipple on a bottle for you.


+9 more 
posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:08 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Sounds like the left is desperate about something.

Which is odd because according to them, Biden already won.

So why would it matter at this point?



edit on 2-12-2020 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:09 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Lock her up!




posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut

Sounds like the left is desperate about something.

Which is odd because according to them, Biden already won.

So why would it matter at this point?




I would speculate the hammer might be about to fall on Hunter, thus the pressure on Trump's daughter. Backchannel political intrigue at its finest. Or frustrated he hasn't conceded
edit on 2-12-2020 by putnam6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: chr0naut

Lock her up!



I just think the media is hoping to get some more Trump things going.

After all, if Joe gets in they will be covering for him by not reporting his "issues"...

So what else will they have to report to their rabid brain-dead viewers?

CNN wouldn't be in business anymore if Trump hadn't come along, after all...




posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut

Sounds like the left is desperate about something.

Which is odd because according to them, Biden already won.

So why would it matter at this point?




I would speculate the hammer might be about to fall on Hunter, thus the pressure on Trump's daughter. Backchannel political intrigued


A good observation and straight out of their playbook...





+1 more 
posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

The leftists have become doorknob-humping retards.

And I say that in all sincerity.




posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:15 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Its been a media shot show for years.


Wtf are you talking about?



posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut

Sounds like the left is desperate about something.

Which is odd because according to them, Biden already won.

So why would it matter at this point?



They are probably going to prosecute once Trump is no longer protected by being a sitting President, I'd guess.

Wasn't Trump trying to prosecute everyone else well after they left office? Fair's fair, he set up the precedent.


edit on 2/12/2020 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:22 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut
Haven't you been paying attention to the Election-related hearings? Answering questions "under oath" doesn't mean squat any more.


edit on 12/2/2020 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut

Sounds like the left is desperate about something.

Which is odd because according to them, Biden already won.

So why would it matter at this point?



They are probably going to prosecute once Trump is no longer protected by being a sitting President, I'd guess.

Wasn't Trump trying to prosecute everyone else well after they left office? Fair's fair, he set up the precedent.



You do realize that Ivanka is not, in fact, the sitting President?

She can be sued at any time.

Although this is a possible misuse of campaign funds...

So like when Obama took a couple million dollars in overseas contributions and got caught doing it, the same thing will probably happen to her as it did to him.

A fine.

Sorry to burst your hate bubble.

But not really.





edit on 2-12-2020 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut
Haven't you been paying attention to the Election-related hearings? Answering questions "under oath" doesn't mean squat any more.


Actually, it is having a team of lawyers trying not to allow someone to be questioned under oath that looks peculiarly crooked.

But yes, for a long time it has been meaningless - unless it is a right-wing pundit who writes about it and also writes 'BOOM' or similar cliche meaninglessness as part of the headline.



edit on 2/12/2020 by chr0naut because: Cool juxtaposition above this post. LOL.



posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut

Sounds like the left is desperate about something.

Which is odd because according to them, Biden already won.

So why would it matter at this point?



They are probably going to prosecute once Trump is no longer protected by being a sitting President, I'd guess.

Wasn't Trump trying to prosecute everyone else well after they left office? Fair's fair, he set up the precedent.



You do realize that Ivanka is not, in fact, the sitting President?

She can be sued at any time.

Although this is a possible misuse of campaign funds...

So like when Obama took a couple million dollars in overseas contributions and got caught doing it, the same thing will probably happen to her as it did to him.

A fine.

Sorry to burst your hate bubble.

But not really.




They are not going after you (or her) they are going after him.




posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 09:51 PM
link   
Thats the first step towards total contral by the evil forces of communism, even god elected trump could not defeat the nasty commies, all hail our new overlord Justin Bieber.



posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 10:04 PM
link   
umm dont care about hunter but trump right his daughters are hot and id date then good thing we are not related lol
why the heck the right is so into hunter i don't know .
people may not like trump but no one on the left cares about what his kids are doing .
matter of fact no one on the left really cares avout what your doing either .


you guys need a hobby like you say were will media get story's without trump and you guys .

Yes CNN loves trump he is good for ratings



posted on Dec, 2 2020 @ 10:53 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut


With the "pay for pardon" investigation as well, this makes three investigations in the last 48 hours.


Kind of surprised there aren’t already multiple threads about this. Or Flynn urging the President to suspend the constitution.

Then again, these aren’t conspiracies. This is real life. Real government corruption. It’s no surprise the people here want to bury their heads in the sand.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:25 AM
link   
All she need do is just pull the hillary defense. Or as any sane person does is just say I do not remember.


A White House spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The inaugural committee has said its finances were independently audited, and that all money was spent lawfully.

The lawsuit is apparently without merit if that is correct.
edit on 20000000ppam by yuppa because: explnation



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 06:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut
Haven't you been paying attention to the Election-related hearings? Answering questions "under oath" doesn't mean squat any more.



Like that dumbass from Detroit last night saying "Mr. Chair, I want these people under oath!"

What a sht show.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 06:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut

Sounds like the left is desperate about something.

Which is odd because according to them, Biden already won.

So why would it matter at this point?



They are probably going to prosecute once Trump is no longer protected by being a sitting President, I'd guess.

Wasn't Trump trying to prosecute everyone else well after they left office? Fair's fair, he set up the precedent.



There is a queue of lawsuits waiting for Trump to lose the protection of the White House.




top topics



 
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join