It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When the case reaches the Supreme Court, the justices have been traditionally reluctant to pick winners and losers in elections. Also, the Supreme Court is likely to insist that questions of voter fraud had to be settled in state and federal trial courts. In the federal court system, the Supreme Court would expect the federal district courts to have adjudicated whether or not voter fraud occurred and if it occurred in sufficient numbers to award the presidency to Trump. Unfortunately, given the Constitutional deadlines, including the setting of the inauguration day on January 20, 2021, there may not be enough time for the federal district courts to conduct the trials that would be required.
Fortunately, the Constitution provides the Supreme Court a remedy. When the Electoral College fails to vote 270 electors to any one presidential candidate, the solution is for the Supreme Court to throw the election to the Congress.
The Election Goes to Congress
According to Article II, Section 1, Clause 3 of the Constitution, as modified by the Twelfth Amendment, the U.S. House of Representatives votes for the president and the U.S. Senate votes for the vice president. In the House of Representatives, each state gets one delegate vote in the vote for president; in the U.S. Senate, the candidate receiving the majority of votes becomes the vice president.
corsination.com...
GOP Poll Watcher and Fraud Expert Gives Explosive Testimony About What He Observed Happen in Delaware County
Not one procedure defined by the Delaware County Board of Elections and Election Process Review was followed, he added.
townhall.com...
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
The stuff she is alleging here is going to take massive amounts of evidence to prove.
We are looking at months of court time while the judge and lawyers go through it all.
But let me point out the chyna. That sounds like the way trump says it. That was done on purpose.
I'll let you guys make up a reason why that would be done.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: mobiusmale
You can see who won now, Biden, and who lost, Trump. Only people who want to live in a fantasy take this LARP she's on seriously.
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: mobiusmale
You can see who won now, Biden, and who lost, Trump. Only people who want to live in a fantasy take this LARP she's on seriously.
That's funny coming from a dude whos posts sound like he's channeling the ghost of the antediluvian
Why would she publicly claim all of this without evidence to back it up? Why destroy a reputation (if it's still good) and make a mockery of yourself if you didn't have the goods? The negativity around it just makes me wonder, you know?
If I had damning evidence I wouldn't be out there in public making speeches about it, I'd just go in and do it.
originally posted by: mobiusmale
You can't explain the obvious (and material) anomalies or mathematical impossibilities either...
originally posted by: Murgatroid
At this point in time Trump KNOWS he cannot lose, he knows that 'We the People' will have the final say...
originally posted by: underpass61
That's funny coming from a dude whos posts sound like he's channeling the ghost of the antediluvian