It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit

page: 7
18
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 23 2020 @ 11:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
Friends close and enemies closer. Always. He brought in people who he could use. They all did spectacular by the way. When they did not follow policy and he was done with them he moved on.

He even said nice things when they were let go. Then if those let go fired back or wrote a book he torched them. He should have.

Everything Trump has done since in office has been legal. All of it. The issue is that politicians are not supposed to be in office to fix things in the modern age. They are there to keep the money flowing. He stopped that. Take away a persons money and they will get desperate. As they all did.

No, it will all play out. If it is done legally then votes will be dismissed. The Progressives will then yell that Trump is suppressing the vote. Then, if it works the way it should, the electorate will be decided and Trump will remain president.

If not, then we all see what happened clear as day. It has fractured the nation but it was not Donald Trump who did it. He is the president who finally exposed it. The first since JFK to be honest.

Their best play was to actually leave him in office. Now, nothing will get done in DC and the SCOTUS has the votes to prevent widespread social reform but if could come to a city near you.


If he is the one that exposed it, why didn't he try and fix it before the election? It's easy to say things, he did that a lot, but what did he do in practical terms to stop it? Mobilise the Police, FBI?? Nope. Nothing. It's like he had no actual evidence..




posted on Nov, 23 2020 @ 12:19 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

The important thing is the PA judge did the Trump team a favor by rejecting the case immediately after opening arguments.

The Court of Appeals has already accepted it for "Expedited Review".

Source: twitter.com...

The Supreme Court aligned itself last Friday to receive the case, if (hopefully) the Appeals Court rejects it also.

It is at the Supreme Court where the classified evidence alluded to last week by Rudy G., during the team's press briefing, will be presented.




posted on Nov, 23 2020 @ 12:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
It is at the Supreme Court where the classified evidence alluded to last week by Rudy G., during the team's press briefing, will be presented.


If new evidence is presented in an appeal it will immediately be sent back to the originating court. Stop making things up.



posted on Nov, 23 2020 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: carewemust
It is at the Supreme Court where the classified evidence alluded to last week by Rudy G., during the team's press briefing, will be presented.


If new evidence is presented in an appeal it will immediately be sent back to the originating court. Stop making things up.

You're looking at everything from a "how it's always been" perspective. You may be right, but its doubtful, considering how this Trump team operates.



posted on Nov, 23 2020 @ 02:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
You may be right...


It's not may, it's 100% true, that's how the legal system works here.



posted on Nov, 23 2020 @ 03:11 PM
link   
Yeah, the SC doesn't try cases or weigh evidence

Bush in 2000 had to claim a constitutional issue to get it to the SC. He actually used the 14th amendment.

I'm afraid AM is right.



new topics

top topics
 
18
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join