It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit

page: 5
18
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 21 2020 @ 11:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

That they were wrong on the big picture and the means justify the ends.




posted on Nov, 21 2020 @ 11:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: rickymouse
I wouldn't mind Trump loosing if the Democrats had a decent candidate, Biden and Harris are not whom I would like to see run this country. Can't the Dems get a decent candidate these days?

Many of the candidates were better than Biden. But Democrats tend to do what they're told. They were told by Congressman/Civil Rights Icon JAMES CLYBURN (D-SC) to vote for Biden. And before long, Biden was the Dim front-runner.


Obviously, never been at a meeting with Democrats.

Are you saying James Clyburn didn't put Biden in the lead, by telling those in South Carolina to vote for him?


I’m in Arizona.

I have no idea what goes on in S Carolina.


Clyburn single-handedly put Joe in the lead: www.cbsnews.com...

(About the clip: Biden has aged a lot in just the past 9 months, hasn't he!)



posted on Nov, 21 2020 @ 11:30 PM
link   
Clyburn's endorsement indeed helped Biden when they were trying to pin defund police on Biden and the Dems, and that did help him, but so what that's politics.



posted on Nov, 21 2020 @ 11:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: rickymouse
I wouldn't mind Trump loosing if the Democrats had a decent candidate, Biden and Harris are not whom I would like to see run this country. Can't the Dems get a decent candidate these days?

Many of the candidates were better than Biden. But Democrats tend to do what they're told. They were told by Congressman/Civil Rights Icon JAMES CLYBURN (D-SC) to vote for Biden. And before long, Biden was the Dim front-runner.


Obviously, never been at a meeting with Democrats.

Are you saying James Clyburn didn't put Biden in the lead, by telling those in South Carolina to vote for him?


I’m in Arizona.

I have no idea what goes on in S Carolina.


Clyburn single-handedly put Joe in the lead: www.cbsnews.com...

(About the clip: Biden has aged a lot in just the past 9 months, hasn't he!)


He’s a politician. You think he should be digging ditches?

Where was the Right politician? Guess he wasn’t doing his job.

Regarding Biden. I read what the Right on ATS says about him. Then I watch him. He’s articulate, knows what he’s talking about, had no problem standing up to Trump. And I think he looks a hell of a lot better than Trump does.



posted on Nov, 21 2020 @ 11:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell
Clyburn's endorsement indeed helped Biden when they were trying to pin defund police on Biden and the Dems, and that did help him, but so what that's politics.



Exactly!

Guess we should just ignore those who got out and stumped for Trump.



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 12:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee




He’s articulate, knows what he’s talking about

say what ?


edit on 22-11-2020 by Dolby_X because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 08:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell
And this REPUBLICAN judge as far as I know is NOT a secret democrat.

Maybe, but he is an Obama appointee, so more than likely he is just another RINO swamp rat.



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 08:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
Regarding Biden. I read what the Right on ATS says about him. Then I watch him. He’s articulate, knows what he’s talking about, had no problem standing up to Trump. And I think he looks a hell of a lot better than Trump does.

Words... words... words... fail... me... I guess the best response is just...

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 09:09 AM
link   
Obama appointed judge Brann. And you say republican? Lol. Amazing how democrats just change the truth to fit the selected narrative. Total BS. It is so obvious what the democraps are doing. Lie lie lie. B bu But, that’s a Republican judgereply to: Willtell



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 09:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
Regarding Biden. I read what the Right on ATS says about him. Then I watch him. He’s articulate, knows what he’s talking about, had no problem standing up to Trump. And I think he looks a hell of a lot better than Trump does.


Who are you trying to fool? It's not working on anyone but yourself. Joe has never been articulate, ever, and you can blame it on his speech impediment if you want but his mouth has always worked much faster than his brain. The man is a salesman, nothing else and his congressional record shows it. He couldn't stand with Trump in a debate if his life depended on it, or anyone else for that matter. He got creamed in the primary debates but the DNC wanted him as their candidate. As far as his physical condition? Have you looked at his eyes? Really? He's not there anymore. The only thing that is still old Joe is his love for sniffing women's hair and groping children. That alone should turn your stomach because it's provable in photos and videos - for years.

I'm sorry Annee, you can't defend anything Biden has done or is doing because he's an awful candidate and an awful person. No one here believes you anymore, you just keep repeating the same, tired, Trump-hate to defend Biden which is just silly.



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 09:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Willtell
And this REPUBLICAN judge as far as I know is NOT a secret democrat.

Maybe, but he is an Obama appointee, so more than likely he is just another RINO swamp rat.


So, you don't accept the Election result and now you don't accept a Judge's ruling.


A clear pattern is emerging.



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 09:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Annee
Regarding Biden. I read what the Right on ATS says about him. Then I watch him. He’s articulate, knows what he’s talking about, had no problem standing up to Trump. And I think he looks a hell of a lot better than Trump does.

Words... words... words... fail... me... I guess the best response is just...

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!


Which was pretty much Judge Brann's response to Trump's legal challenge, funnily enough.



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 09:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
So, you don't accept the Election result

Not with the obvious fraud that occurred, no.


and now you don't accept a Judge's ruling.

Not when it is contrary to logic and reason.


A clear pattern is emerging.

Yes, it is. The seditious treasonous rat bastards are being exposed.



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 09:55 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

"Contrary to logic and reason?". How so, exactly?

Please explain.



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 09:59 AM
link   
here is the transcript of the case and verdict

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


In this action, the Trump Campaign and the Individual Plaintiffs (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) seek to discard millions of votes legally cast by Pennsylvanians from all corners – from Greene County to Pike County, and everywhere in between. In other words, Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.



That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 10:03 AM
link   
a reply to: UpIsNowDown

Sounds perfectly logical and reasonable to me.

I can only imagine what it would be like to have to report such an embarassing outcome to a client. Especially if that client was Trump.
edit on 22-11-2020 by Oldcarpy2 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 10:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: HalWesten


I'm sorry Annee, you can't defend anything Biden has done or is doing because he's an awful candidate and an awful person. No one here believes you anymore, you just keep repeating the same, tired, Trump-hate to defend Biden which is just silly.


You don’t speak for me. And, I’m assuming, you do not personally know Biden. My guess is you don’t know anything about him and are going by what you read on ATS and other Right leaning sites.

I’m giving Biden a clean slate — not a pass.

When have I said I hate Trump? I’ve said from the beginning he is unqualified (not by Constitution). He’s a self-serving, narcissist, who “feeds” his followers what they want to hear. All flag waving patriotic isolationism — while he & his kids are making corporate deals overseas for their own personal gain.





edit on 22-11-2020 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 10:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Annee
Regarding Biden. I read what the Right on ATS says about him. Then I watch him. He’s articulate, knows what he’s talking about, had no problem standing up to Trump. And I think he looks a hell of a lot better than Trump does.


Who are you trying to fool? It's not working on anyone but yourself. Joe has never been articulate, ever, and you can blame it on his speech impediment if you want but his mouth has always worked much faster than his brain. The man is a salesman, nothing else and his congressional record shows it. He couldn't stand with Trump in a debate if his life depended on it, or anyone else for that matter. He got creamed in the primary debates but the DNC wanted him as their candidate. As far as his physical condition? Have you looked at his eyes? Really? He's not there anymore. The only thing that is still old Joe is his love for sniffing women's hair and groping children. That alone should turn your stomach because it's provable in photos and videos - for years.

I'm sorry Annee, you can't defend anything Biden has done or is doing because he's an awful candidate and an awful person. No one here believes you anymore, you just keep repeating the same, tired, Trump-hate to defend Biden which is just silly.


Whereas you, on the other hand, just keep repeating the same,
tired, Biden-hate to defend Trump which is just silly.

Do you not see the irony, here?



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi


Even though Regan pulled some BS with the Iran Contra and jacked the country with trickle-down economics I still liked him.


At the time I hated Regan - obviously from afar - but looking back there hasn't been a President since fit to lace his boots.

Not a great fan of his economic and fiscal policies but the man had a presence that hasn't been matched since.



posted on Nov, 22 2020 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Freeborn

Agreed. He was pretty much vilified by the Left over here.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join