It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Peter Neffenger retired vice admiral NS official on Biden's team also COTB Smartmatic

page: 1
35
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+10 more 
posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 02:40 PM
link   
Peter Neffenger, a retired vice admiral and experienced national security official on Biden's team also Chairman of the Board @ Smartmatic
You know the voting software company? or I am getting confused.


On Sunday, Powell cited Neffenger's name while discussing the legal team's accusations against Dominion Voting Systems because he is chairman on the board of directors at Smartmatic, another company that designs electronic voting systems. Smartmatic released a statement clarifying that it is not associated with Dominion Voting Systems, and that in fact "the two companies are competitors in the marketplace."

www.newsweek.com...
edit on 17-11-2020 by putnam6 because: (no reason given)



+11 more 
posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6

Coincidence....Move along.

Also just a coincidence that Feinstein's hubby is a major shareholder in Dominion and Pelosi's Chief of Staff is Dominion's Chief Executive.
edit on 17-11-2020 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 02:54 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6

He is a key player in the voting fraud organization Joe Biden bragged about last month.


+1 more 
posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 02:54 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6

I've been assured and reaasured that there is officially and completely..

"Nothing to see here."


+2 more 
posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 02:57 PM
link   
ALSO just a coincidence that Kermerler Harris' hubby's law firm works for Dominion.



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:05 PM
link   
Okay okay, comrades as long as we are in agreement it means absolutely nothing.
edit on 17-11-2020 by putnam6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:14 PM
link   
I guess the opinion of 59 computer scientists and security experts counts for nothing to "voter fraud" theorists.

A group of 59 computer scientists, researchers and cybersecurity experts on Monday released a letter rejecting President Donald Trump’s claims of widespread electoral fraud as “technically incoherent” and “unsubstantiated” in the latest rebuke of Trump’s campaign to undermine public confidence in the election results.

“We are aware of alarming assertions being made that the 2020 election was ‘rigged’ by exploiting technical vulnerabilities,” wrote the group of experts, which included Matt Blaze, a cryptologist and professor at Georgetown University, and Alex Stamos, the former security chief at Facebook. “However, in every case of which we are aware, these claims either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent.”



Blaze and other signatories of the letter released Monday founded the Voting Village, a section of the annual DEF CON cybersecurity conference that allows researchers to find vulnerabilities in voting equipment so they can be fixed. Trump has in recent days repurposed videos from the conference in an effort to amplify his attack on the election.


Joseph Lorenzo Hall, a senior vice president at the Internet Society and one of the letter’s signatories, said Trump’s invocation of the Voting Village was one reason he wanted to speak out.

“It’s been hard to see legitimate security research weaponized like this,” he said. “This is 20 years of my work, the work of the election security community, that has had one single goal: to make our elections stronger and more secure.”
www.cyberscoop.com...


Strange election where only one result is deemed to be fair and free.



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: putnam6
Okay okay, comrades as long as we are in agreement it means absolutely nothing.


Definitely. Absolutely. NOTHING.



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:17 PM
link   
Rigged tighter than the sails on the Sloop John B 😃🚨

CNN denies any wrongdoings 😃🚨



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: gortex

Id rather see the opinion of an expert who has or is looking at the actual machines and software
Thanks though.



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: gortex




posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:19 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI




Id rather see the opinion of an expert who has or is looking at the actual machines and software

Already posted above.

Blaze and other signatories of the letter released Monday founded the Voting Village, a section of the annual DEF CON cybersecurity conference that allows researchers to find vulnerabilities in voting equipment so they can be fixed.



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: gortex


You're invoking the words of Stalin now ?



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
I guess the opinion of 59 computer scientists and security experts counts for nothing to "voter fraud" theorists.

A group of 59 computer scientists, researchers and cybersecurity experts on Monday released a letter rejecting President Donald Trump’s claims of widespread electoral fraud as “technically incoherent” and “unsubstantiated” in the latest rebuke of Trump’s campaign to undermine public confidence in the election results.

“We are aware of alarming assertions being made that the 2020 election was ‘rigged’ by exploiting technical vulnerabilities,” wrote the group of experts, which included Matt Blaze, a cryptologist and professor at Georgetown University, and Alex Stamos, the former security chief at Facebook. “However, in every case of which we are aware, these claims either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent.”



Blaze and other signatories of the letter released Monday founded the Voting Village, a section of the annual DEF CON cybersecurity conference that allows researchers to find vulnerabilities in voting equipment so they can be fixed. Trump has in recent days repurposed videos from the conference in an effort to amplify his attack on the election.


Joseph Lorenzo Hall, a senior vice president at the Internet Society and one of the letter’s signatories, said Trump’s invocation of the Voting Village was one reason he wanted to speak out.

“It’s been hard to see legitimate security research weaponized like this,” he said. “This is 20 years of my work, the work of the election security community, that has had one single goal: to make our elections stronger and more secure.”
www.cyberscoop.com...


Strange election where only one result is deemed to be fair and free.


You can get 59 "scientist" to say anything... 59 economists to say anything... 59 attorneys.... 59 national security experts...

Some of these people are so blinded by ideology, they will deny or parrot practically anything with no basis or proof whatsoever other than it doesn't jive with their beliefs.



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: gortex


You're invoking the words of Stalin now ?


Since Stalin is now slightly to the right politically of the American Democrat party, why not?

After all, the New Green Deal alone reads like Stalin's wet dream.

But hey... how about all these Democratic leaders family members working for a voting software/hardware company that Chavez used to keep in power?

Nothing to see here, move along?




posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Edumakated




Some of these people are so blinded by ideology, they will deny or parrot practically anything with no basis or proof whatsoever other than it doesn't jive with their beliefs

Strangely enough that was my thought ... but not about the computer scientists.



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Edumakated




Some of these people are so blinded by ideology, they will deny or parrot practically anything with no basis or proof whatsoever other than it doesn't jive with their beliefs

Strangely enough that was my thought ... but not about the computer scientists.


My point is that being a scientist does not make one immune to bias. Appealing to authority does not change the facts or logic that is being debated.



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
ALSO just a coincidence that Kermerler Harris' hubby's law firm works for Dominion.


Y'all have got to be kidding... Are all these people really tied into high ranking people for the companies these booths and their software belong to???



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:39 PM
link   
Neffenger sounds like a racial slur.

Joe Biden confirmed white supremacist. Someone tell BLM.



posted on Nov, 17 2020 @ 03:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: putnam6
Okay okay, comrades as long as we are in agreement it means absolutely nothing.


Definitely. Absolutely. NOTHING.


Okay thanks for the clarification vodka shots for everybody.

Now does my social score go up because we are all in agreement it's means absolutely nothing, or does it do down for bringing it up in the first place?



new topics

top topics



 
35
<<   2 >>

log in

join