It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Researcher
Hey! I have an idea! Let's read the actual words of real Freemasons, get it straight from the horses... um, anatomy.
Illuminati and Freemasonry.
J.D. Buck; The Genius of Freemasonry; Page 36:
If the sincere and thoughtful Mason would "take notice" of the symbolism and the use made everywhere in the Lodge of the word "Light", and remember that the real Initiates are called also "the Illuminati", (Sons of Light), those who are illumined, and who in turn illuminate.
Manly P. Hall; Lectures On Ancient Philosophy; Page 409:
...its purpose is to impress upon the reader's mind the philosophical and political situation in Europe at the time of the inception of the Masonic order. A philosophic clan, as it were, which had moved across the face of Europe under such names as the "Illuminati" and the "Rosicrucians," had undermined in a subtle manner the entire structure of regal and sacerdotal
supremacy.
Foster Bailey; The Spirit of Masonry; Pages 20-21:
Little as it may be realised by the unthinking Mason who is interested only in the outer aspects of the Craft work, the whole fabric of Masonry may be regarded as an externalisation of that inner spiritual group whose members, down the ages, have been the Custodians of the Plan, and as Those to Whom has been committed the working out of the will of God for the race of men.
They can be known ... as the Masters of the Wisdom for They are skilled in the divine ways and have mastered the arts and sciences which Their fellowmen have yet to master. They are the Dispensers of Light and to Them has been given, by virtue of Their achievement, the privilege and the authority to pronounce the great Masonic formula: 'Let there be light' and to evoke the response: 'And there was LIGHT'.
They are therefore sometimes known as the Illuminati and can direct the searchlight of truth wherever its beams are needed to guide the pilgrim on his way.
Tell you what. I'll let the Freemasons foam at the mouth over this a bit. Then I will post the quotes where Freemasons say all religions are derived from, and a subset of, Freemasonry. So it all doesn't end up in one big mind-boggling ball of text that no one will read.
[edit on 29-3-2005 by Researcher]
Originally posted by akilles
You know, that argument might stand if these books had been written by non-Masons, such as myself.
Then you could say it is ony an individual interpretation of the teachings.
But no, they are written by educated Masons, who care enough to dedicate their thoughts to paper, and have them printed and recommended by Fellow Masons. Hell, if Freemasons didn't buy these books, who would?
Hence, they have a duty to deliver a COMMON interpretation of teachings, more likely than not, the interpretation that was taught to them, although again, you will puppet, that they were not TAUGHT how to interpret them. Well then I say, what is so unique about Masonic secrets if not the way in which you are taught, therefore in the way your thinking is affected by the teachings.
And of course, the way the teachings are related is the key, the key to CORRECT interpretation.
Originally posted by sebatwerk
Originally posted by Hunting Veritas
sebatwerk you seem to get quite frustrated by akilles, how do you know what you are talking about??? Where do you get all your info??
I get very frustrated by Akilles because he spread slander and lies, despite being given correct information time and time again. I am a Freemason, and I get my information from my own personal experience, as well as the personal experiences of my brothers.
Originally posted by Hunting Veritas
Sebatwerk ok I can believe it is a fraternity BUT one controversial question?
If these "people of power" are just in a frat. then why do they also belong to other frats???
Like Bohemium club, Skull and bones, builderbergs etc, etc. Before you start blowing your horn ALL of these so called "Frats." exist.
Are the Bilderbergers a fraternity? How about the bohemian club? I do not believe they are, but rather just organizational events. Skull and Bones is nothing more than a debate society, not very impressive.
And there are no links between masonry and all those other organizations. So what do they have anything to do with this thread?
[edit on 29-3-2005 by sebatwerk]
Originally posted by NuTroll
hey i looked up orientism on google. I got only 4 pages worth of hits and most of it had to do with programing language. online encyclopedias were not helpful either.
what sites or books did you use in your research.
masons function as a group has a collateral effect for research / idealism / psuedo religious / scholarly evidence for a unilateral church of all religions. not trying to be positive or negative here. In a way, they are the clergy, as evident by their cheif opposition , also being another order/type of clergy. It doesnt really matter who started it either. (btw the catholic church has a history of appeasement/incorporation of paganism, so i guess you guys are sort of similar in a way).
secrets dont matter, only public opinion matters. secrets are only for changing public opinion before they can be targeted.
isnt it confusing when one symbol has so many individually made up interpretations? im sure you lot park some lines here and there...
Originally posted by NuTroll
i also looked it up in a few other sources, incluing online and offline encyclopedias. but thank you for completly missing the point of why i posted the results of my inquiry on google, obfuscating the other points of my post, and leaving yourself open for further attacks on your positions credibility: because your losing the argument of public opinion.
Originally posted by akilles
You know, that argument might stand if these books had been written by non-Masons, such as myself.
Originally posted by Akilles
President Madison, confirmed Mason. Married into the Todd family. Todd related to the Collins family. You know, Joan Collins.
President Lincoln, not confirmed Mason by any means. Never joined but 'held a deep respect' (aka "followed orders"). Married to a, ummm, hmmm, well let me just double check here. Yup, he married into the Todd/Collins bloodline as well.
Hmm, quite the way to control these men, by the balls so to speak? But if they looked like Joan Collins, AND were rich, is it still questionable? I think so
Considering that many traditions speak of the Female bloodline having the power, maybe this is something that should be looked at? Maybe, for example, Hillary Clinton?
Originally posted by senrak
Come clean Akilles. WHY do you HATE Freemasonry so much? Why are you so scared of it? Why do you continue to spread lies? What has Freemasonry EVER done to you? I'd REALLY like to know...and I think several others on this forum would too.
Originally posted by Hunting Veritas
I know your going to say these people have meetings to talk about business and it's so secretive because they don't want the media messing with 'em every 5 mins. This is not right. WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW what these powerful people are saying behind closed doors. Which is also the same for "other" secret societies.
Masons do have a sort of link to these other organizations as I have heard (I'm not stating it's true) the Templar knights created the masons which I
know it sounds far fetched but this is a theory site.
STOP being biased saying mason's are good happy people and start looking higher up the ladder. For instance are you not in different levels of masonry and are you not told about the next step until your there.
Originally posted by akilles
And yet, who considers David Icke to have done ANY research worthy of note?
Originally posted by akilles
Every time I have given personal accounts of Freemasonry that deserve criticism, I have been ignored, so no wonder you guys seem to have forgotten.
Originally posted by Researcher
Hey, I'm back! And I see the same old empty arguments...
Manly P. Hall was made a 33d degree Freemason for his contributions to Freemasonry. If this book, or the information in it, was anathema to Freemasonry, he would not have been honored with the last and final degree.
If the last couple of remarks are starting to sound a little freaky - big freaky to follow.
Originally posted by Researcher
Hey, I'm back!
And I see the same old empty arguments...
Manly P. Hall was made a 33d degree Freemason for his contributions to Freemasonry. If this book, or the information in it, was anathema to Freemasonry, he would not have been honored with the last and final degree.