Why would Fox News send digital data by courier?

a reply to: tanstaafl
So they couldn't have copied the contents and set the thing back so that FOX wouldn't have been the wiser?

The claim is that they did this so that they could show their texts were being monitored? You believe this? Nevermind, your opinion is just as valid as mine.

Isn't it against the law to transmit child porn over the internet?

I don't know about any of you but I have deleted the cloud like programs from by computer. Just another vector for hackers.

And you can only send so many bits of data email.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: tanstaafl
So they couldn't have copied the contents and set the thing back so that FOX wouldn't have been the wiser?

Of course they could have. But they're morons.

The claim is that they did this so that they could show their texts were being monitored? You believe this? Nevermind, your opinion is just as valid as mine.

Not with any certainty, no, I'm not even sure it was Tucker that mentioned that, although he explicitly did state that their texts were being monitored in a response to someone who asked him if they had backups, when he said "Of course we do, my point is they are reading our texts."

a reply to: tanstaafl
Or it is all BS and FOX is no different than the rest of the MSM and wanted to draw viewers with a cloak and dagger bit.

Possibly if this is laptop data and supposedly there are child porn images on it transmitting child porn is considered a pretty bad thing to get popped for.

Also in theory hard copy sending is more secure, lot of ways to steal in transit data.

But If I was a betting man if the kiddie porn imagery theroy is true then thats why.

Nah, it's illegal to send that in the mail/courier too. If they had any brains, not claiming they do, whatever was on it was encrypted well anyways. Whoever opened the packet, and copied it have nothing.

originally posted by: incoserv
I just read an article of Fox's website about the recovery of the information that UPS lost. Frankly, I'm baffled.

I'd assumed that it was a package of original printed documents that they wanted to vet. Turns out they were shipping A USB FLASH DRIVE via UPS.

I do not understand!

If I wanted to convey digital files across the country, it'd never occur to be to ship them by courier on a flash drive. Kind of defeats the whole purpose of digitizing. Digital transfer of data is a no-brainer.

I'd definitely employ redundancy. You know Fox News has bandwidth and clouds pace. You upload the data redundantly to two or three storage spaces then give your recipient access. That download and it's all transferred

Just seems like sending a flash drive by courier is kind of a non sequitur.

Anybody have any idea what that was all about?

It's not like you can email GB worth of data, however for a big corp, setting up a secure cloud-share site should be pretty easy.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Possibly if this is laptop data and supposedly there are child porn images on it transmitting child porn is considered a pretty bad thing to get popped for.

Also in theory hard copy sending is more secure, lot of ways to steal in transit data.

But If I was a betting man if the kiddie porn imagery theroy is true then thats why.

These were not the Biden laptop documents. Im betting they were financial statements from Bidens partner as they were looking into Biden finances. So someone wanted to see what they knew?

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: tanstaafl
Or it is all BS and FOX is no different than the rest of the MSM and wanted to draw viewers with a cloak and dagger bit.

But it isn't, it has all been verified, by multiple different sources.

Both Hunter and his lawyer even went so far as to ask for the laptops back,,, how ridiculous...

a reply to: tanstaafl
What has been verified?

Does anyone know for sure if they are the laptop documents?

Saying that their texts were being monitored and tying it to this incident does let their audience conjure a bit of cloak and dagger scenario in their heads, which seems to be exactly what happened.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: tanstaafl
What has been verified?

Does anyone know for sure if they are the laptop documents?

No, these were documents from Bobulinski, the Bidens business partner who knows everything about their criminal enterprise. Those documents have all been verified by the Senate Homeland Security committee.

Biden is done for.

I will not be surprised when we hear that Hunter Biden has committed suicide by shooting himself in the back of the head twice...

Saying that their texts were being monitored and tying it to this incident does let their audience conjure a bit of cloak and dagger scenario in their heads, which seems to be exactly what happened.

a reply to: tanstaafl
In the first video in the article linked in the OP, at 0:22 he says: "we should tell you that the documents did not come from Tony Bobulinski".

Regardless of what the documents actually were, playing up the monitored texts/intercepted mail angle was political/MSM theatre.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: tanstaafl
In the first video in the article linked in the OP, at 0:22 he says: "we should tell you that the documents did not come from Tony Bobulinski".

Interesting, missed that... sorry, my bad...

But that's actually even worse for the Bidens, you realize that right? Multiple unrelated sources, all providing substantial evidence of the Biden crime family.

Regardless of what the documents actually were, playing up the monitored texts/intercepted mail angle was political/MSM theatre.

Or... not. It could have been just as described... a fishy event.

a reply to: tanstaafl
I don't care what it means to the Bidens.

It was just a fishy event that they framed to pique interest.