It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

the false left/right paradigm

page: 1
23
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+5 more 
posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 04:39 PM
link   
I get fed up with so many threads ending up in the Political mudpit, but I’ll be a hypocrite and place mine in there as well, to ensure we enter lively debate. I've been wanting to write this for a while when I researched to get to what this left/right means.

I think this is an important thread as we see our so called free societies crumble, the wearing of masks as a sign of submissiveness to “The State”. Talk of Vaccine/Immunization Passports/ Locked down cities/States.

I’m amused and saddened at this so called left/right paradigm throughout modern history.

I wish people would join together and realize that the only fight is between the common man and the ruling class enemy i.e. Royalty, Technocrats, Monopolists, Titled by Inheritance Lords. Oligopolists, etc.
Your rulers that enjoy manipulating the media, recording and rewriting of history, control over taxes/spending can never be the left/right. They are not representing the Commonwealth of the people.

If you look at the history of where the term “the Left” came from it was created in France during Napoleon’s reign after the storming of the Bastille.

www.google.com...
“1799
Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After seizing political power in France in a 1799 coup d'état, he crowned himself emperor in 1804.”
He was also the first in creating the bureaucracy.

Bureacracy meaning:
1. 1a : a body of nonelected government officials. b : an administrative policy-making group. 2 : government characterized by specialization of functions, adherence to fixed rules, and a hierarchy of authority. 3 : a system of administration marked by officialism, red tape, and proliferation.

en.wikipedia.org...–right_paradigm#:~:text=The%20"false%20left–right%20paradigm,ruling%20authority%20over%20the%20masses.
The left–right paradigm as political criticism
Used in another context, the phrase refers to a political theory that alleges that members of opposing major political parties such as the Republican and Democratic parties in the United States share common interests and goals, as well as a covertly unified ruling authority over the political issues of the masses. The two major political entities act in concert to create divisiveness among the population while keeping control of the political spectrum.

This "left–right paradigm" concept theorizes that the two opposing political parties utilize their tremendous hold over mainstream media to dramatize political distractions and engage in covert warfare and operations, in grand performances of bureaucratic rivalry meant to propagandize and divide the populace. Divisive issues are purposefully fed through the major media outlets to divert attention away from the ruling class's hidden and ulterior (and sometimes global) agendas.

en.wikipedia.org...
“Within the left–right political spectrum, Left and Right were coined during the French Revolution, referring to the seating arrangement in the French Estates General. Those who sat on the left generally opposed the Ancien Régime and the Bourbon monarchy and supported the French Revolution, the creation of a democratic republic and the secularization of society [6] while those on the right were supportive of the traditional institutions of the Old Regime. Usage of the term Left became more prominent after the restoration of the French monarchy in 1815, when it was applied to the Independents. [7] The word wing was first appended to Left and Right in the late 19th century, usually with disparaging intent, and left-wing was applied to those who were unorthodox in their religious or political views.”

If you want to understand anarchists you have to look at Bakunin
Wiki
“Bakunin is remembered as a major figure in the history of anarchism, an opponent of Marxism, especially of the dictatorship of the proletariat and for his predictions that Marxist regimes would be one-party dictatorships over the proletariat, not by the proletariat.”
Fascism
wiki
“Fascism is a system of government led by a dictator who typically rules by forcefully and often violently suppressing opposition and criticism, controlling all industry and commerce, and promoting nationalism and often racism.
In 1919, Mussolini founded the Italian Fasces of Combat in Milan, which became the National Fascist Party two years later. The Fascists came to associate the term with the ancient Roman fasces or fascio littorio[16]—a bundle of rods tied around an axe,[17] an ancient Roman symbol of the authority of the civic magistrate[18] carried by his lictors, which could be used for corporal and capital punishment at his command.”

And in particular for our American friends:
The Fasces in the House of Reps in USA - “know who wields the stick over you”


Link if youtube doesn't work
www.youtube.com...





Don’t play their game - your neighbor is your brother/friend suffering the same injustices

Written by a great American composer -Aaron Copeland gifted to us as an anthem - performed by ELP




edit on 18-10-2020 by TheConstruKctionofLight because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-10-2020 by TheConstruKctionofLight because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 04:42 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Our government is corrupt.

Any ideology enabling the size, scope of government should be condemned.

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 05:00 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Its a simple question. What do politicians(both sides, all branches) agree on?

Despite the constant barrage of bs they do agree on things.

Chiefly, spending money they don't have and that we have yet to fork over.

What you can say and how you can say it.

What firearms you may own and how to comply with that ownership.

What you may do with your property. How much of it you "own" and taxes that you must pay to continue to own it.




Need I go on?



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


If the Constitution was so black & white — we wouldn’t need Constitutional lawyers.

And we’ve got a whole crap load of them.


+9 more 
posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 05:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


If the Constitution was so black & white — we wouldn’t need Constitutional lawyers.

And we’ve got a whole crap load of them.


The Constitution IS black and white.

We have lawyers to obfuscate and enable government control, scope and power.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 05:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


that will take some explanation..but is required.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 05:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: DBCowboy

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


that will take some explanation..but is required.


Our nation is founded on the Constitution.

It is a guideline, a document that spells out the limits of government and recognises individual freedoms and liberties of everyone.

It's our Magna Carta.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: DBCowboy

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


that will take some explanation..but is required.


Our nation is founded on the Constitution.

It is a guideline, a document that spells out the limits of government and recognises individual freedoms and liberties of everyone.


Which is 230+ years old.

What could possibly not be relevant today.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 05:57 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Left Right, it's just another divide and conquer tactic people with monies and power utilities to keep us apart and away from destroying "there" Ivory Towers with them inside.
edit on 18-10-2020 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: DBCowboy

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


that will take some explanation..but is required.


Our nation is founded on the Constitution.

It is a guideline, a document that spells out the limits of government and recognises individual freedoms and liberties of everyone.


Which is 230+ years old.

What could possibly not be relevant today.


So you openly admit you're not for the Constitution.

Thanks.
edit on 18-10-2020 by DBCowboy because: Covid drank my beer



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:03 PM
link   
The Left/Right Paradigm stems from the usage of the brain .
It is hardcoded in
Every
Single
One
Of
Us.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: DBCowboy

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


that will take some explanation..but is required.


Our nation is founded on the Constitution.

It is a guideline, a document that spells out the limits of government and recognises individual freedoms and liberties of everyone.


Which is 230+ years old.

What could possibly not be relevant today.


Humans and all the things involved with them never changes!



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


If the Constitution was so black & white — we wouldn’t need Constitutional lawyers.

And we’ve got a whole crap load of them.


The reason for Constitutional Lawyers is because there's too many groups and people violating the Constitution continuously (mostly Democrats since 1828). If nobody stopped them, what do you think would happen ? 😎🚬




posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: DBCowboy

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


that will take some explanation..but is required.


Our nation is founded on the Constitution.

It is a guideline, a document that spells out the limits of government and recognises individual freedoms and liberties of everyone.


Which is 230+ years old.

What could possibly not be relevant today.


What parts are not relevant ? 😃



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: DBCowboy

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


that will take some explanation..but is required.


Our nation is founded on the Constitution.

It is a guideline, a document that spells out the limits of government and recognises individual freedoms and liberties of everyone.


Which is 230+ years old.

What could possibly not be relevant today.


So you openly admit you're not for the Constitution.

Thanks.


Those are your words and your interpretation.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: DBCowboy

The only party that makes any sense is the Constitutional Party.


that will take some explanation..but is required.


Our nation is founded on the Constitution.

It is a guideline, a document that spells out the limits of government and recognises individual freedoms and liberties of everyone.


Which is 230+ years old.

What could possibly not be relevant today.


So you openly admit you're not for the Constitution.

Thanks.


Those are your words and your interpretation.


No.

It is my response to your words.

YOU HAVE FAILED ONCE AGAIN!



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Those are your words and your interpretation.



No.

It is my response to your words.


Actually it is both.

Anyway, Constitution relevant or not, the thread is about "false left/right", not about some small party that resonates with some people.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

It's sad, don't you think, when people consider the Constitution a small party that resonates with some.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Maybe it is a communication problem?

The Constitution isn't a party but the Constitution Party is, in fact, a small party that resonates with some.
edit on 18-10-2020 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 06:30 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

It's sad when the Constitution has been so minimalized that it even has to have a party.



new topics

top topics



 
23
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join