It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NEW Debate Rules!!!!

page: 2
13
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 17 2020 @ 11:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Guyfriday
I don't think even the Talos-4 booty heads could help Joe.




posted on Oct, 17 2020 @ 11:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: interupt42

Against Trump?????

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You haven't seen many of my posts, have you???

LOLOLOL!!!!!

Thanks for the laugh though!


F the commission for debate and those rules. Let an independent ask questions and not the same stupid question. If the commission did those rules they would provide biden all the questions upfront like they did with hilldog, the questions would all attack trump and even the questions given t biden would attack trump just like all the others . Im not even a trump supporter but tired of all the control and blatant tactics ised by the left to controll the narrative.


One debate should deal with only conflict of interest, term limits, revolving doors, lobbying, and money to run pfor election and 1 debate should have more than just republican and democrat. Everything elses is pointless


edit on 341031America/ChicagoSat, 17 Oct 2020 23:34:49 -0500000000p3142 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2020 @ 11:41 PM
link   
Another rigged debate. F the debates.



posted on Oct, 17 2020 @ 11:42 PM
link   
Why not let the public ask questions? In this day and age with the technology we have. Shouldn't the person looking to own, I mean work for the public engage in dialogue with the public?

Why do we allow paid for actors act as medians for us? Can we not speak for ourselves? Have you older folks gotten so use to rolling over for society "status-quo" that you can no longer envision a change?

We can get footage of a shooting around the globe within 15 minutes of it happening, but average joe cant talk to the upcoming president?



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 12:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

How about just one rule? We put them both in a locked cage.

One question. Two knives:

Who wants the Presidency the most?

Toss in the knives and sit back for what I believe would be a very lively debate. Until it isn't.

And as a jester of good will toward the losing political ideology we wouldn't have to argue over who the winner is.



edit on 18-10-2020 by highvein because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 12:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Just.... no.
...

How it used to be before...

The incumbent had 60 minutes to speak.

The other person had 30 minutes to rebut, 60 minutes to speak... 90 minutes in total.

The incumbent then had 30 minutes to rebut.

I would like that format again.

Sans moderators.




I like this A LOT.

But I'm also of the opinion that anyone who wants to get into politics should be disqualified for that very reason.




posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 12:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Guyfriday

Capt. Pike was cool!


[for Guy..]
To this day I don't think they could put enough makeup on
Jeff Bejesus Hunter to make him look anything that homely.

Back to the rules... I suggest three minutes instead of ten. That
would mean 10x2x3 min. even with no time for questioning. And
even five minute stretches of some people make me want to rip
my own head off and stump around non-lookin' to share..spooky.
(WTFF it's almost Halloween go for it) But Waits there's more.

X. Either debater caught in a documented lie gets pulled off the
ticket and replaced with one of the candidate's alleged rape victims
because... autocredibility is a 21st Century thing now.
Unless you're a guy. Especially a white guy. Yeah, I'm totally incredible


Y. Any second or more infractions of interruption will be accompanied
by an electronically induced, permanent personality shift in your spouse
/ significant whoever to the exact inverse of all your personal views.
Trust me that's some severe rectum-rending punishment to sustain,
my friend. I've lived there for over six years now...standing room only.

I'm ramblin' I know. Ahab, 200HP wood chipper please I'm ready now.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 01:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Guyfriday
I don't think even the Talos-4 booty heads could help Joe.



Care, this is where our tastes may differ slightly. Susan Oliver
is a multitalented (private prop license) foxsicle with a four
digit IQ maybe. With the Green Giant spray paint job too YIKES.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 10:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

These new rules might work if the questions are not designed to help a candidate and f# the other. Find out who's writing those questions is the key now.

For example, what if they make 10 questions about Trump's taxes or national security issues.



posted on Oct, 18 2020 @ 10:17 AM
link   
I just cannot wait for the near future when the minimum age for president has been lowered to 16, and "they/their" are some failed soundcloud rapper/lipsyncer TikTok-er with rainbow hair and and incoherent mouth noises is elected as president.




top topics



 
13
<< 1   >>

log in

join