Originally posted by Hobbes
So, the Templars and the Speculative Masons have some common interests, and as such developed as similar organizations. The Masons borrowed a few
symbols and principles from the earlier order, because they fit - why reinvent the wheel? And at the same time, by adopting these ancient designs, the
Masons added an ancient feel to the order.
But did the Templars become the Freemasons? Wishful thinking, in my mind.

If there are tangible links, ie. the Sinclair family of Rosslyn fame, and evidence that supports the Templars taking refuge in Scotland, etc., which
there is, then it is starting to grow into something more plausible than wishful thinking. I have read dozens of works on the subject, together they
expose more than a few such bits of supporting evidence. If Masons are not directly from them, as they themselves say, then by coincidence, they sure
have a lot of commonalities.
PS, thanks stalkingwolf.