It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If Halliburton can get away with charging $28,000,000 for $82,000 worth of oil, then they will...actually they are required.
The purpose of a corporation is simple, to make the most amount of money for the people that actually own the company. In this case, the thousands of shareholders that own stock in Halliburton.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
Apparently you don't read very well. They have to transport that oil on short notice.
The purpose of a corporation is simple, to make the most amount of money for the people that actually own the company. In this case, the thousands of shareholders that own stock in Halliburton.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
The idea of a corporation is for everyone to make money.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
They are not evil. You can demonize them all you want. It's just ridiculous.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
It does nothing for a corporation to completely screw over the employee, because the employee is also ultimately the customer. Those that do pay for it in the end, like Enron.
its pointless to argue anyway, even if they totally shut down haliburton (which they wont) another contractor will pop up and continue right where the last one quit.
I read the article very well and I do think it's absurd when a company charges you a $27,000,000 shipping and handling fee.
Actually, the sole purpose of a corporation is for the owners (share holders) to make money. Any action that is non-beneficial to this purpose is deemed illegal.
Actually Enron like companies are a common practice in The Corporation. Matter of fact, it is encouraged. Enron lobbied to bend, narrow, and repel laws that limited them to make the their money. They were successful. Ultimately, Enrons downfall came in 2000 when they monopolized and took clear advantage of the California power outages that plaque the west coast in the summer.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
You have no proof to back up anything you say.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
then corporations wouldn't give their employees any benefits. They would pay them minimum wage.
Corporations only give their employees enough benefits to maximize their productivity. It's carefully calculated on a Cost-Benefit analysis. Same scale in which companies decide whether it would be financially beneficial to the company to recall every vehicle because of a fatal defect or do nothing and deal with the possible court cost of a fatality on each vehicle.
Edit: Disturbed Deliverer, I suggest you read 'The Corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power' by Joel Bakan. It can answer many of your questions.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
You clearly don't understand capitalism or economics. What does a corporation get by cutting their employees pay?
Well, a temporary increase in profit. What happens in time?
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
I have no questions.
Originally posted by SonofSpy
There is a German company called Bechtel that can do all of it. they are about 3/4 the size of Halliburton but are just as capable. Itd be pretty hard to pull stuff like that with Bechtel with the eyes of the world watching them after the Halliburton rape. Theyed work far cheaper and more efficient. The Germans would have saved the day.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
Arguing with people like you makes my head hurt. The pure lack of logic is astounding some times. I was not asking you, or anyone else questions...
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
You clearly don't understand capitalism or economics. What does a corporation get by cutting their employees pay? Well, a temporary increase in profit. What happens in time? The employees don't have enough money to consume. That means the money the heads have loses its value. The same happens if they don't reinvest.
No such Article.
We're sorry, but the article you requested is not currently available on HoustonChronicle.com.