It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The Rise of Post-NeoMarxism and the Ongoing Cold War

page: 1

log in


posted on Sep, 27 2020 @ 05:21 PM
I've been trying to wrap my head around, I dunno, all the things in the world for the last 12 years or so. Ever since the crash of 2008 something changed.

It's something I think a lot of people have noticed, if only subconciously. Things started changing rapidly after that. A new agenda had started ramping up.

Long Rambling Introduction Complete With Long Winded Personal Anecdotes and Stories

At that time I was in school and for a few years after that worked as a biologist on a local wildlife conservation and research organization a friend.of mine and I started.

From 2010-2012 I worked with various government organizations and other groups.

A bit of an aside, Around that time, a few laws were passed that changed the way public scientific data was released and our grant was threatened unless we stopped public release of our data...but I digress...

We worked closely with the school at the time, so I was around there and seen the new groups of students and the changes being implemented to the programs and the school itself. The first 'safe spaces' started popping up around that time and the social justice agenda had taken hold.

It was apparent at events and groups I worked with at the time, something had changed with everything.

The last year I was in school was fairly eye opening as well. There was a switch in the kinds of things we were taught. It was where things like global population control and sustainable economics began to crop up. We had a mandatory ethics course that basically involved learning about how to ethically justfiy anything. We started being told bull# about how as scientists we were 'better' than average people and needed to be in charge of the information because we knew what was best for the world.

That whole last year of school left a bitter taste in my mouth. Up until that point, everything had been practical objective science. Then that last year we were basically told

'Bias was ok as long as it helped globalism'

Getting to the Point

Over the years after that, it was hard to miss the changes that had rapidly injected themselves into society. Social justice issues and identity politics had firmly embedded themselves as part of liberal ideology.

Concepts such as racism, sexism, bigotry etc. had suddenly found themselves inexplicably intertwined with such concepts as social programs, universal healthcare, welfare, UBI.

These things in the end have absolutely nothing to do with eachother. But suddenly, it was an all or nothing scenario. You took the whole 'liberal' package or nothing. There was no more center, no more mixed views, no more room. It became us or them.

However you felt any one of these particular issues, you must accept them all, or you are them.

These ideas are rooted in both Classical Marxism and Neo-Marxism. But they are something more. A new Marxism, evolved from neo-Marxism, a globally focussed all encompassing Marxism.

And in keeping up with pretentious political analyst naming conventions I call this.


Both classical Marxism and to an extent, though the globalist roots take hold here, Neo-Marxism were both focussed more at a national level than a global one.

Neo-Marxism began the process of switching focus from nationalized government controlled industries to an oligarchal corporate controlled system. This switch can be summarized as such:

Big business can maintain selling prices at high levels while still competing to cut costs, advertise and market their products. However, competition is generally limited with a few large capital formations sharing various markets, 

As we've seen, this has slowly been the case, especially in recent years with large tech companies.

Unsurprisingly, large tech companies are by and large, 'liberal'.

Neo-Marxism however, was still more about nationally contained big business with a centrally controlling Marxist government overseeing things.

Globalism changed things.

Globalism is Marxism

Globalism is the idea that we are one world, one people, which is true but, also, that we should have one over arching global economy.

This economy, is currently being pushed and ushered on the hardest by big tech companies, but other large companies that have escaped their national boundaries and realized, the next step was to keep the population in check.

But how do you keep 7 billion people in check? Well there's population reduction for one, but, in the meantime however and even with less people, you'll need some form of government to stop all these disparate people from various places all doing the same thing and loyal to the same masters.

What would be a good way to do this?

Why a handful of giant corporations with the technology to monitor the entirety and the ability to subvert the authority of local authorities through a puppet organization such as the UN oughta do it.

Digital Marxism and the New Cold War

What we've been experiencing this last decade is a new cold war being waged by a group of people bent on controlling the world using technology on a global scale. Through acquisition and control over most of humanities channels of communication the world has slowly been indoctrinated using a classic Marxist technique involving manipulating a population into believing contradictory ideas and being ok with this.

By forcing people to take the 'updated liberal ideology' as an all or nothing deal, it forces people to accept and internally be ok with things they otherwise wouldn't be because otherwise they become the enemy, the others.

Closing Thoughts

The current lines in the sand being drawn, the violence, the media storm, lockdowns everything is all a leadup to one big push by these Globalist Marxist to gain control over the world.

If we accept such things as a global centrally controlled currency, constant surveillance, destruction of free speech and thought, censorship, compliance with arbitrary rules....

We Lose.

posted on Sep, 27 2020 @ 05:42 PM
The thing that changed in 2008 was the Obama Presidency. We have been going down hill since that loser was elected.

posted on Sep, 27 2020 @ 05:51 PM
a reply to: dug88

Marx pointed out that capitalism needs to engulf the entire world before anything will 'change'.

How is this a Marxists fault? It's literally true. Globalism isn't Marxism, it's being ushered in through corporatism, which both marx and smith warned about as being dangerous to a free market.

posted on Sep, 27 2020 @ 06:10 PM
a reply to: strongfp


Gotta love when the true nature of capitalism (corporatism) is being pinned on "post-neomarxism" (and how many 'posts' and 'neo's can we throw in there before it doesn't resemble marxism? hint: it's doesn't even take both of them)
Capitalism is as capitalism does. And capitalism "winning" will lead to its own demise. But hey, keep railing against the tiny smidges of socialism that, in truth, are the only thing that will keep capitalism alive as a sustainable construct.

posted on Sep, 27 2020 @ 06:36 PM
a reply to: dug88

Dug, thats one of the very best OP's I have read in a very long time.

I think you are drop dead correct. I am also coming to believe that resistance is largely a lost cause simply because the Neo-Marxists control too many levers of control of the society and government. They have a death grip on education (indoctrination); they have total control of 95% of print and digital media, and of course the news services. In many parts of the US of course, they have total control of every organ of government......California, the rest of the Left Coast and much of the Northeastern Corridor. And I suspect they control much of the Deep State, particularly the FBi and the so-called Justice Department.

The thing that really scares me is, knowing that they are likely to win out altogether the question you want to suffer this out in the US or do you want to carve out a future for yourself somewhere else.....but worse, will you even be able to leave. COVID 19 has closed off much foreign travel......What will the Pandemic of 2021 or 2022 bring....more boder closures?

As the rioters and Democrat Mayors turn cities into burned out hulks reminiscent of Detroit; as "normal" people flee the coasts to seek futures and refuge in the hinterlands of Texas and the Mid-West we have to be cognizant of the fact that at some point in the not too distant future, "They", neo-marxists, will control the electrical grid........where will YOU feel safe when the lights go out? Do you really want to be caught hanging out in the US?

posted on Sep, 27 2020 @ 06:37 PM
Marxism or any other versions of this they are trying to call it, should be ignored since anyone looking at this can tell that this version of Marx's Philosophy is called Trotskyism. It's not designed to be a form of globalism, but rather designed to push the world into chaos while maintaining that chaos away from a very controlled area for people to go "If they accept the ruling by the elite classes".

In Trotskyism you create an environment of chaos, then provide a safe haven for people to live if they do what the state tells them to do. By making people want to go to the state, it becomes easier to keep them under your control through threats that they will be killed or worse, tossed back out into the chaos to try and survive.

What we are seeing is people saying "Marxism this, or Marxism that, but in reality it's all Trotskyism.

posted on Sep, 27 2020 @ 10:08 PM
a reply to: dug88


Have you not caught on yet? Do you not know who Karl Marx served?

Do you not know what is coming? It is almost time for the worst years on earth before the return of Yeshua HaMashiach.

Marx: A Devout Disciple of Satan

The agent of evil
The satanic side of Marx can be glimpsed in the numerous poems he wrote in which he lashes out against God and takes the side of the devil. In some poems, he equates himself to God, having power over all creation. In a part of a poem titled Human Pride, Marx reveals his desire to replace God with himself.

“Words I teach all mixed up into a devilish muddle.

Thus, anyone may think just what he chooses to think.

With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the face of the world,

And see the collapse of this pygmy giant whose fall will not stifle my ardor.

Then will I wander godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world

And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator,”

“Till heart’s bewitched, till senses reel:

With Satan I have struck my deal.

He chalks the signs, beats time for me,

I play the death march fast and free,”

edit on 27-9-2020 by infolurker because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 28 2020 @ 04:08 AM

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: dug88

Marx pointed out that capitalism needs to engulf the entire world before anything will 'change'.

How is this a Marxists fault? It's literally true. Globalism isn't Marxism, it's being ushered in through corporatism, which both marx and smith warned about as being dangerous to a free market.

All the -ism words are used to confuse and dilute the issues.

It's about Freedom vs Control.
That's all.

posted on Sep, 28 2020 @ 04:18 AM
a reply to: infolurker

We don't create reality, God does and has complete power.

There is no way to be equal to that.

God has infinite love and mercy yet none of us come close. Marx was disdainful and vengeful. I'm pretty rotten too half the time lol.

What kind of idiot wants to be God anyways? It's endless problems for eternity. He only solved them cuz he time travels but it's taking him forever so... Id rather not deal with all that lol.

posted on Sep, 28 2020 @ 11:12 AM
a reply to: muzzleflash

I believe the -isms, are for discussion to describe groups, and society as a whole. Instead of blanket statements like left or right. Human civilization is extremely complex in social structure. It needs definitions for intelligent debate.

posted on Sep, 28 2020 @ 11:21 AM

A RedState series that will help your argument along.

You're not alone OP in what you suspect although we're in a not so cold phase if the graphic is to be understood correctly.

posted on Sep, 28 2020 @ 11:22 AM
a reply to: muzzleflash

God is giving us what we want, good and hard.

posted on Sep, 28 2020 @ 12:43 PM
a reply to: dug88

It actually probably started around 1913. Technically way before that, because the same beast has been dragging its claws across the earth forever. But 1913 is the closest event to when a "global" takeover made its run starting with America.

posted on Sep, 28 2020 @ 07:31 PM
a reply to: ketsuko

Does it not ever cross your mind that perhaps people revolt for a certain reason?

posted on Sep, 29 2020 @ 01:59 PM

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: ketsuko

Does it not ever cross your mind that perhaps people revolt for a certain reason?

Did it ever cross your mind that while everyone who revolts does so for a reason, most every violent revolt in history has ended up in worse circumstances than they left?

posted on Sep, 29 2020 @ 03:36 PM
a reply to: ketsuko

That's a bit of an understatement. Pretty much all of human history and progressive change is because of revolts.
edit on 29-9-2020 by strongfp because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 29 2020 @ 04:19 PM
a reply to: ketsuko

Link to the PDF

Assessing Revolutionary and Insurgent Strategies
United States Army Special Operations Command

A grab from the original -

That's definitely something worthy of reading. Thanks for the link to the article.

edit on 9/29/2020 by Blaine91555 because: (no reason given)

top topics


log in