It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Dr. Anthony Fauci says an Explosion of Deadly Covid-19 is Imminent.

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

+20 more 
posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:46 PM
Saturday, September 26, 2020

Sometimes Dr. Fauci makes the Media/Democrats Very Happy (1 million deaths!).

At other times, he makes the Media/Democrats very Angry (People should vote in person).

Today, he's spewing doom-porn, which makes those who don't give a crap about American citizens (the Media/Democrats) very happy.

Fauci says a big resurgence of deadly Covid-19 is likely flare-up in America very, very soon!

Dr. Anthony Fauci has said the U.S. is still in the first wave of its COVID-19 outbreak, and faces a "challenge" as it heads into the fall and winter.

Fauci, a member of the White House coronavirus task force and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told CNN: "Rather than say, 'A second wave,' why don't we say, 'Are we prepared for the challenge of the fall and the winter?'"

The country's top infectious disease expert said the idea of a second wave comes from the 1918 flu pandemic. After a spike in cases in the spring, the disease "literally disappeared," followed by an "explosion" in the fall over a century ago.
More at:

So he's basing his belief on how a disease epidemic behaved in 1918? Why doesn't Dr. Fauci humble himself, in light of the number of times he's been wrong this year alone?

Everything from Masks, to Death Projections, to Human-to-Human transmission, Dr. Fauci has been all over the place. Yet still delivers these dire warnings and predictions with a straight face.

The Southern Hemisphere is exiting from the FALL season with no Spike in Covid-19 or the Flu.


But ignore the facts. The U.S. Media and Democrats love Dr. anyway.


edit on 9/26/2020 by carewemust because: (no reason given)

+24 more 
posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:50 PM
And I don't believe him. However, it would bolster his claims if he proved it by catching it himself and kicking off.

Sick of him and his manipulative BS, not enough words to describe HOW sick of him I am.

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:51 PM
a reply to: carewemust
This is a great vid comparing all the pandemics...and the curve is the same, no matter what humans do.

+7 more 
posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:51 PM
It'd be so much better if the explosion of Dr. Fauci was imminent.

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:52 PM
Of course, it is!

Be very, very afraid. Big Brother loves you. Big Brother will protect you. Do whatever Big Better says.

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:52 PM
a reply to: carewemust

Of course he is. Right on time, just as many of us predicted, hey? Covid-19 is only going to get more deadly, more contagious, more horrendous in its effects, more unstoppable and its mutations more psychopathic and God-like, the more people who start questioning the whole thing.

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:53 PM
a reply to: Nyiah

Get too sick and they're going to mark you down as a cv19 death.

They get paid more that way.

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:54 PM

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

It'd be so much better if the explosion of Dr. Fauci was imminent.

I'm not cleaning it up this time. Tell DB it's some exotic pasta dish and let him do it.

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:54 PM
a reply to: carewemust

Well, he has been absolutely wrong about everything so...

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:59 PM
It’s a pry-wedge in the door for Harris/Biden.

Nothing more than that, except that he should be ashamed of himself.

# 1161

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 01:59 PM

originally posted by: Nyiah
I'm not cleaning it up this time. Tell DB it's some exotic pasta dish and let him do it.

Nah, leave him as a reminder until the buzzards finish.

+2 more 
posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 02:00 PM
When the yearly flu and pneumonia gets going and gets labelled as Covid then yes there will be more deaths.

+13 more 
posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 02:00 PM
Is he serious?

When did COVID "virtually disappear" over the spring and summer? I've been suffering from the freaking mask mandates and business restrictions and everything else this whole time. If he's telling me it's been virtually gone, then I am seriously put out and someone has hell to pay.

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 02:06 PM
a reply to: carewemust
Im sure this is the scripted response to De Santis taking Florida back to fully open.

Time to slather on the fear and set Republicans up for more finger pointing.

O noes

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 02:08 PM
Was the corona crisis planned?
How did the corona crisis begin? And how did it become a media event? If you examine the exact course of events in January 2020, surprising insights arise - and some questions. An excerpt from the new book "Chronicle of an Announced Crisis".

On New Year's Eve 2019, the corona crisis began to unfold in the media - initially hesitant and inconspicuous. The first report appeared on December 31st and read:

“A mysterious lung disease has broken out in the central Chinese metropolis of Wuhan. So far, 27 sick people have been identified, reported the city's health commission. The 'People's Daily' countered rumors on the Internet that there could be a new outbreak of the Sars lung disease. The health commission reported that many of the infections could be traced back to visiting Wuhan's Huanan fish market. The sick were placed in quarantine. Seven are in serious condition. "

This dpa report, which was apparently based on a message from the Reuters agency, which in turn was based on a press release from the Wuhan City Health Department, was published in dozens of German media, but it did not cause any further attention due to its lack of recognizable relevance.

The fact that 27 sick people (not dead) at the other end of the world even led to an agency report in Germany and other western countries needs to be explained. The fact that news agencies considered this information to be worth publishing was unquestionably related to the “rumors on the Internet” mentioned in the report (by whom?), In which it had been speculated that the lung disease SARS, which appeared epidemic in 2003 and has since disappeared, might possibly be possible have erupted again. SARS was still vividly remembered by many, as the phenomenon had made headlines around the world for weeks. All the first reports about the "mysterious lung disease" referred to the SARS outbreak 17 years ago. That was the context that generated interest in the first place.

An information check started at the time of the first publication. According to a Chinese report dated January 1, 2020, police in Wuhan arrested several people for spreading "false information" about the disease online, leading to "negative social effects". The police warned the citizens of the city not to “believe or circulate any rumors” and to ensure “a harmonious, clean Internet” - recommendations that should soon become popular in Germany as well.

There was uncertainty about the beginning of the epidemic. In April 2020, reports surfaced in the American and Israeli media that a department of the US military intelligence service DIA, the so-called National Center for Medical Intelligence, had both its own government and NATO as well as the Israeli military in front of a had warned of a spreading epidemic in the Wuhan area, which could develop "catastrophically". The secret service denied the report. If it was nevertheless correct - which the additional confirmation from the Israelis supported - an obvious question would be how the secret service had come to its findings in November - when apparently even the Chinese authorities were not yet aware of an outbreak.

In the first half of January, the topic remained largely below the threshold of awareness in Western media. There were isolated reports, but no prominent reports. Even when it was reported for the first time on January 9th that the "mysterious lung diseases in China were apparently due to a previously unknown coronavirus" that had been detected in "15 of the almost 60 officially sick people" in Wuhan, this did not appear in Germany Evening news, but only in an online article on The editors illustrated the text with a photo of the city of Wuhan in thick smog, which subtly indicated that the lung disease might also have something to do with the heavy air pollution on site.

The fact that a team led by virologist Christian Drosten from the Berlin Charité had already developed a PCR test for virus detection on January 16, which the WHO immediately recommended to laboratories around the world, was initially not registered by the media. Drosten later explained the unbelievable speed of this test development:

“It all started between Christmas and New Year's that the first informal information arrived here. (...) We actually relied on a few clues. We had information from social media that this could be a SARS-like virus and then we put one and one together. (...) And when a time later the colleagues from China made the first genome sequence of this new virus public [on January 10th; P.S.], of course we compared that with all of our candidate tests, picked out the best and continued to work with them. (…) We made this test available to colleagues in China, whose names I cannot give now. And they tested it for us and told us that it worked well. "

The impetus for the test development was given by the unspecified “rumors on the Internet” already mentioned, and the effectiveness of the test was confirmed by “colleagues in China” who remained anonymous. As I said, none of this was reported in the media in mid-January. At that time, the “mysterious lung disease” was still a niche topic at the other end of the world - while some experts in the background were already setting the course for the coming months.

Practice and reality mix
On Friday, January 17th, something downright strange happened in this context: The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, together with the World Economic Forum and the Gates Foundation, published a joint press release in which the exercise evaluation of "Event 201" was presented, in particular the policy recommendations that had been made three months earlier. As is known, corporate managers and officials played through a coronavirus pandemic during the exercise in October 2019. The January 2020 announcement said:

“The next serious pandemic will not only cause illness and death, but could also trigger economic and social chain reactions (...). Efforts to prevent or respond to such consequences as they unfold will require an unprecedented level of collaboration between governments, international organizations and private companies. "

The further expansion of an international vaccine reserve, the dismantling of regulations for vaccine development and an intensified fight against false information were warned. Above all, it was bizarre that the corona crisis, which was just unfolding, was not mentioned at all, but the press release had obviously been launched in this context. Otherwise it could have been published three months in advance, immediately after the end of the exercise. Practice and reality interlocked in a strange way.

The great media interest in the virus, which continues to this day, began suddenly and exactly three days later, on Monday, January 20, one day before the opening of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, the annual meeting of the most important state and government agencies CEOs of the world. On this day, the new disease was also mentioned for the first time in the main edition of the Tagesschau. The two-minute feature appeared at the end of the program after extensive coverage of the upcoming WEF meeting. On the headline "Massive increase in coronavirus cases", moderator Jens Riewa explained to the television audience:


posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 02:09 PM
a reply to: carewemust

To be fair, he's doing his job. He is supposed to be the doom sayer, and he is basing this doom on relevant data and historical information.

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 02:10 PM
Of course Fauci has been all over the place with his predictions; he like all the other experts don't know what is going to happen because they have never had to deal with a pandemic of this kind before. That doesn't make then any less expert at dealing with infectious diseases; just that there is a gap in knowledge and the best that can be done is fill it with predictions that can just as easily be wrong as it can be right.

The problem with Fauci and other experts is that their hubris doesn't allow them to explain their lack of knowledge to others. At the same time they have no reservations exaggerating and lieing in order carry out people management. The have no problem coercing others to act in the ways they best see fit by any means necessary.

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 02:12 PM
“The novel coronavirus in China is spreading surprisingly quickly. According to official information, more than 200 people are already suffering from a lung disease that is triggered by the pathogen. Three neighboring countries have now also reported infections. The World Health Organization convened a panel of experts to recommend, among other things, possible measures. According to Chinese researchers, the virus is also transmitted from person to person. "

The statement that the virus spreads “surprisingly quickly” was only weakly substantiated at the time, given that there were only 200 infected people within three weeks. The essential new information was the now declared transferability from person to person. What was also new was that the Chinese government had now radically changed its initial course of sweeping the subject under the carpet and now declared the crisis itself with all its might and public vigor as a state affair. Starting January 20, the Chinese health authorities submitted a daily report with the latest corona case numbers. The Tagesschau also referred to these first numbers in its television report. The short moderation by Jens Riewas was followed by a report by the Beijing ARD correspondent, which said:

“Now before the New Year celebrations, it is the main travel time in China. Everyone is checked at the Wuhan train station. Fever monitors and medical personnel are in use. (...) So far, three people have died. Most of the patients are not seriously ill, have a fever and have difficulty breathing. (…) On state television today, a researcher reported on infected people who were not in Wuhan themselves, but relatives of them: 'We can therefore confirm that there are cases in which the virus was transmitted from person to person. With this message it is clear: The virus will spread further in China and control the disease wave will be more difficult. "

This set the tone for the coming weeks - and not just in the news. The media interest that was suddenly rising at this point can also be traced back to the reports in the New York Times. While only a few articles about the virus had appeared up until then, for example on 10.1. ("China reports first deaths from new virus"), January 15. ("Japan and Thailand confirm new cases of the Chinese coronavirus"), 17.1. ("Three US airports check passengers for a deadly Chinese coronavirus"), 18.1. ("Deadly mystery virus reported in two new Chinese cities and South Korea"), and 1/20. ("China confirms that the new coronavirus is transmitted from person to person"), the amount of articles exploded with the start of the WEF meeting in Davos.

On January 21 alone, the opening day of the conference, the New York Times published five different articles on the coronavirus and, for the first time, an easy-to-read "Wuhan Coronavirus map" to track the outbreak. Also on January 21, the WHO published its first "Coronavirus Situation Report", which has been published daily since then. The starting shot for the media and political "corona fire" was given.

The Covid-19 dashboard is ready to use immediately
The very next day something else happened that was very momentous for the media communication of the topic: The Johns Hopkins University launched its Covid-19 dashboard, the now famous online world map in which the geographical distribution of all corona cases and their development trend, the case and death numbers were constantly updated. At the start on Wednesday, January 22nd, a press report said:

"According to official Chinese reports, 444 people had been hospitalized by Wednesday afternoon, at least 17 of whom died of the novel coronavirus. But the map, unveiled Wednesday by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, suggests that these numbers may be growing faster than national sources show. "We think it's important for the public to understand the situation as it progresses with transparent data sources," said Lauren Gardner, professor at Johns Hopkins University who led the team that created the map. (...) According to Gardner, the map is a 'very simple' collection of reported cases, compiled from sources at the local level and requiring no modeling. To create the map, Gardner and her team viewed and compiled local Chinese media reports. These reports were then translated into English and their locations mapped. As new reports come in, the map is updated, says Gardner. "

The dashboard developed a life of its own because it was easy to understand. Hundreds of media around the world adopted the data and the type of graphical representation. This was an excellent illustration of the elusive danger of an epidemic. The dashboard also served the media's need for constant news and updates - and thus fueled public nervousness. From then on, many editors and media consumers, but also politicians, looked spellbound at the rising curves that were built into almost every article on the topic and that gave the impression that one had already understood the essentials with one look. "Source: Johns Hopkins" became a household word in the media, where American numbers were mostly blindly trusted. Through the dashboard, a private US institution gained international authority over the number of cases.

The next big bang also followed on January 22nd: The Chinese authorities announced that they would place the ten million metropolis of Wuhan and several other large cities completely under quarantine the following day. Nobody would then be allowed to enter or leave these cities - an unprecedented action on this scale. The decision seemed to confirm the magnitude of the danger. As an observer, it would have been assumed that the situation would be exceptionally threatening if the government took such an extreme step.

On the same day, an attempt was made within the WHO committees to induce the authority to declare a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern”, which initially could not be enforced internally, but was made up for on January 30th. (1)

Global reporting now focused entirely on the Corona issue. On January 23rd alone, 13 (!) Articles on the subject appeared in the New York Times. The headlines read among others: “Fears about the new coronavirus seize Davos” and “How China's virus outbreak could threaten the global economy”. (2)
As mentioned, almost 3,000 politicians, managers and journalists, including many of the most powerful heads of state and corporate leaders, met in Davos at the same time, from January 21 to 24. This circumstance is reminiscent of the already described pandemic scenario of the exercise “Atlantic Storm” from 2005, where the news of an epidemic outbreak also surprised the heads of state at an international conference where all decision-makers were conveniently already gathered together (see Chapter 4). Here is the corresponding excerpt from the script at the time:

“On January 13, the eve of the summit, cases of smallpox were reported in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Turkey. The heads of state and government decide to meet for a few hours on January 14th before heading home to deal with the emerging crisis. During the six-hour meeting, the transatlantic heads of state and government grappled with the scale and rapid pace of the spreading smallpox epidemic, the tensions between domestic and foreign policy, the challenge of controlling the movement of people across borders and the global lack of critical ones medical resources like a smallpox vaccine. "(3) TBC

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 02:16 PM
If you replaced the word “pimple” with “coronavirus” and January 13th with January 23rd, then you ended up very precisely in reality.

The most important decision-makers are gathered
The annual WEF meeting in Davos is the largest and most prestigious event of its kind. At the end of January 2020, the leaders of the world's most powerful corporations gathered there, including the heads of Google, Apple, Facebook and Microsoft. Then there were the CEOs of the leading pharmaceutical companies: Roche, Bayer, Sanofi, Astra Zeneca (the company that sold Germany a few months later for a three-digit million sum a vaccine that had not yet been developed) and the head of the pharmaceutical company Moderna, where you can find yourself focused on novel mRNA vaccines that were developed at high speed during the corona crisis. Also present were the chairmen of the vaccine alliance Gavi and the vaccine research association CEPI, Richard Hatchett, who shortly afterwards "coordinated the worldwide Covid-19 vaccine development".

The other guests in Davos included the bosses of various big banks as well as BlackRock, Visa, Mastercard, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Atlantic Council, the chairmen of the central banks of a dozen countries, numerous editors-in-chief of the major media and the heads of state and government from several dozen countries. including Donald Trump and Angela Merkel.

During the exciting week in Davos, they all had ample opportunity to coordinate their reactions to the crisis - not necessarily only on the open stage, but also discreetly on the sidelines of the event. The direction of politics was set by a comment in the New York Times on January 23: "Be prepared for anything and leave it to the experts."

Simultaneously with the conclusion of the WEF meeting on January 24th, the WHO reported 25 corona deaths worldwide. This number did not fit at all with a threatening “global crisis”. And yet the political decisions described, their media support and the general projection of a “new SARS” gave the impression of a gigantic danger.

What is noticeable in retrospect: On January 24th, when the heads of state and corporate leaders gathered in Davos traveled home, several elements essential for the future management of the Corona crisis had already started or were operational:

the PCR test to collect the cases
WHO's daily situation reports for public information
the Covid-19 dashboard for a graphic representation of the situation in the media
the policy recommendations of the WEF and the Gates Foundation

Everything was prepared. And indeed: from that point on, the crisis unfolded almost automatically. The big pandemic machine, designed, tested and prepared for an emergency for years, was now running.

At this point, too, the note should be added: This observation does not yet assume any planning or deliberate cause of the pandemic. The process can also be explained harmlessly: the institutions involved were simply “drilled” for such an outbreak. Virologists were constantly looking for new pathogens, eager to detect them. Scientists like those at Johns Hopkins University had done nothing for 20 years but warn of bio-terror and pandemics. If their real possibility became apparent, they unfolded maximum activity. The WHO and many other authorities only implemented procedures that had been rehearsed a dozen times, striving to work as “efficiently” as possible, not to make any mistakes and to follow the rehearsed protocol exactly. Seen in this way, it was actually a kind of machine that, once started, followed its programmed momentum.

So much for the harmless explanation. Yet others remained conceivable.

This text is an excerpt from the book "Chronicle of an Announced Crisis - How a Virus Could Change the World" published on September 14th, Westend Verlag

posted on Sep, 26 2020 @ 02:17 PM
This is now becoming nothing more than a 'controlled demolition' of the world economy which was way overdue anyhow.


new topics

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in