It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lazar has been compared with Edward Snowden, where nobody has been shy about wanting to prosecute Snowden for actually leaking real secrets.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
“The second question is, that if all I’ve just presented to you is true and the government is keeping this a secret, how can I make a video telling you about it?
Well the bottom line is, if there are any repercussions from making this video, it would simply confirm that what I told you is true.
So what you do with this information is up to you.”
What kind of repercussions would make him a bonafide truth teller?
The Bob Lazar groupies just completely overlook logic. Look at the intelligence community's reaction to Edward Snowden. No doubt about it, if Bob Lazar was releasing top-secret information, he'd have been imprisoned 20 years ago ...
One of the biggest pieces of Bob Lazar's story that completely falls apart is his claims about the secret facility built into the side of a mountain at Papoose Dry Lake.
Rest assured that 30 years of intense research has gone into trying to find evidence or get information on this alleged base, and 30 years later we've turned up nothing!
Well, actually we've turned up a lot more than nothing... We've actually turned up a lot of evidence that nothing is, or was ever out at Papoose Dry Lake! Another Key piece of Bob's story is a complete and total fabrication.
Only good in a "turbo encabulator" sense, that can fool non-techies. Real competent techies are not fooled by turbo encabulators or by Lazar's pseudoscience and dictionary abuse, like re-naming the "strong nuclear force" to "gravity A".
I’m not convinced Bob is above board....Liar Liar Pants on Fire comes to mind at the moment. If he’s good at one thing, that is beIng able to speak in techno-babble.
originally posted by: UKWO1Phot
"IF" it is real.
Wouldn't he be giving the Government proof that Lazar stole Secret Government property?
Wasn't this the supposed reason for the raid on Lazars business in the documentary??
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: oeilitt
wow that whole thing made no sense. Im impressed you can write that much and not get to a point. You basically said you cant have gravity without mass welll yeah i guess thats close enough.
Then you made some weird claim about the higs boson and it shows your clueless about it. The higs boson is the particle that is a quantized manifestation of a field (the Higgs field) that generates mass through its interaction with other particles. Your rant doesnt make any sense .
But i can see you mention Leedskalin so you have been on websites promoting woo.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Today's scientists are still saying that these things are defying physics and that the g-forces would kill our pilots, fully ignoring that what is happening isn't defying physics at all. It's just bypassing g-forces by reducing mass.
originally posted by: Paddyofurniture
Seems the boys are at it again, just in time for this thread
www.instagram.com...
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
In The Lazar Tape vid ending....
I think his last sentences might be worth parsing for interpretation. Here are his words as he speaks them verbatim, after the Teller QnA:
“The second question is, that if all I’ve just presented to you is true and the government is keeping this a secret, how can I make a video telling you about it?
Well the bottom line is, if there are any repercussions from making this video, it would simply confirm that what I told you is true.
So what you do with this information is up to you.”
What kind of repercussions would make him a bonafide truth teller? If you take the worst repercussion that comes to my mind, that would be Death. But if no such repercussion has happened to him, as of yet, then that would mean he is a bonafide story teller. In other words by his own logic and verbalized thought, death legitimizes him, no death de-legitimizes him and he knows that.
His last sentence is not one to convince you, in which I might have expected something along the lines, i.e. “you have to believe me, this is God’s honest truth” etc., instead it seems to me he plants a seed of doubt “information is up to you” , so that it gives you conspirative thinking and controversy is now planted.
I’m not convinced Bob is above board....Liar Liar Pants on Fire comes to mind at the moment. If he’s good at one thing, that is beIng able to speak in techno-babble.
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: oeilitt
wow that whole thing made no sense. Im impressed you can write that much and not get to a point. You basically said you cant have gravity without mass welll yeah i guess thats close enough.
Then you made some weird claim about the higs boson and it shows your clueless about it. The higs boson is the particle that is a quantized manifestation of a field (the Higgs field) that generates mass through its interaction with other particles. Your rant doesnt make any sense .
But i can see you mention Leedskalin so you have been on websites promoting woo.
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
Not to change the subject but what do you think of Phil Schneider? Does his death give his story credibility to you?