The News and Social Media

[perhaps wrong forum, please move if so]

It used to be we read local and sometimes national newspapers. Mostly we just discussed amongsnt friends and family and our community and things that directly affected us. We were able to maintain a 'grip' on these things and come up with workable, simple, solutions to any problems that arose.

Moreover, our own communities understood those needs and could work together. Even with opposing viewpoints the problems were the same and logical solutions were always available. People did what needed to be done.

Now, today, we have a global news and social media. Our problems are not all the same. One solution does not fit all. We are divided in a way we have never seen before. Yet we see all the global problems and want to find solutions, to help. Or to fight against those ideas that work against own.

The media, MSM, social, local, all portray their stories to benefit themselves. Yet, we see them all. And so we are divided.

Politics are no different.

Where can we find commonality? Does anyone care anymore or is everyone too blinded by hate for the "other" that this is impossible?

I'm no bible scholar but I remember reading that when the antichrist comes he will be welcomed as a solution to all these problems.

And, as for ATS, the NWO is looking pretty good now isn't it? We need a unified response to our many and varied problems. A new world order to sort this mess.

I'm ready. Are you?

a reply to: Gnawledge
you do realize what the New world order there's going to be fighting within the ranks of the New world order dictatorship that's just human nature.

So that's why when people mention New world order it's not going to work there might be sections of New world orders around the continents now that's a possibility but there is not going to be one supreme leader for a new world order.

it is possible that each continent which I believe there are seven of them will have a new world order type dictator for their leadership other than that it's going to be impossible for seven world dictators to negotiate who's going to be the prime dictator of the world just not going to happen people.

a reply to: musicismagic

It may not be one person directing the new world order. But in order for their to be an actual new world order those people in power would have to be coordinating and cooperating with each other.

This doesn't sound so bad to me.

a reply to: Gnawledge

I don't care about no stinking new world order just America reborn. Un has fallen apart already and the ottoman empire is reviving itself while Saudis and Israel are fighting Iran across the ME. So far Russia, Turkey, India, Algeria, China, and Israel have all added to/expanded third existing borders.

The only reason Algeria even got extra land was from a trade with Turkey for Libyan land along their border so Turkey could host their jets and use their airspace for the ottoman expansionism in Libya.
Come to think of it, it may have been Angola not Algeria. I better go to my thread and recheck that, I forgot which state was on the Libyan border. That received those concessions.

a reply to: worldstarcountry

But America reborn is just, America. America is great, don't great me wrong but we don't exist alone.

One nuke launched from a foreign country and it's game over for most, if not all, of us. That's worst case.

But economically too, we can't exist alone. A world structure and commonality is needed. And soon.

And then there is climate change...but that will just set people off so please ignore that for now.

originally posted by: Gnawledge
[perhaps wrong forum, please move if so]

And, as for ATS, the NWO is looking pretty good now isn't it? We need a unified response to our many and varied problems. A new world order to sort this mess.

I'm ready. Are you?

No. A NWO and a unified response can suck my cock (the animal that wakes you in the morning).

originally posted by: CopeLongCut

originally posted by: Gnawledge
[perhaps wrong forum, please move if so]

And, as for ATS, the NWO is looking pretty good now isn't it? We need a unified response to our many and varied problems. A new world order to sort this mess.

I'm ready. Are you?

No. A NWO and a unified response can suck my cock (the animal that wakes you in the morning).

Ok. But why? I know NWO has many and varied negative connotations but, why? Solutions to global problems are bad in some way?

a reply to: Gnawledge

There was a world of nations before secret cabals purchased the major military powers' political leadership and consolidated policy making for the affairs of aligned states. You have already begun to see the return to that era. In case you did not notice, many countries are taking their own unilateral "interventions" and trade policies independent of a previously dominant power structure that nearly had unchallenged say over world affairs.

That policy was very near about to usurp our own sovereignty. I'd rather die fighting nasty by hand with the enemy than see American sovereignty usurped by such a world order.

I believe in individual freedom. Not a unified solution. Not a reply to: Gnawledge

a reply to: worldstarcountry

I appreciate your loyalty. I do.

But death is all there is here without a unified, global, solution.

originally posted by: CopeLongCut
I believe in individual freedom. Not a unified solution. Not a reply to: Gnawledge

I, too, believe in individual freedom. If any political party describes me it's libertarian.

But, we, as a global economic and military powerhouse need to get our act together. And I mean together.

originally posted by: Gnawledge
a reply to: worldstarcountry

But death is all there is here without a unified, global, solution.

I dont want to put you in a pot. But, are you a socialist, communist? Just curious

a reply to: CopeLongCut

I'm a human, but as said above...libertarian best describes.

Libertarian you are. You posted too fast reply to: CopeLongCut

How, as a Libertarian, can you believe in a New World Order?a reply to: Gnawledge

a reply to: Gnawledge

Wtf!? A global solution to what?? What the hell are you going on about?? Are you here to sell the replacement2for the UN, is this what you are getting at?? League of Nations 3.0?? Because the first two were so successful at global solutions.

I'm starting to wonder if the global smallpox vaccine may have had a part in the sudden dramatic rise of cancer, heart disease and diabetes in the immediate subsequent decades Across the world.

originally posted by: CopeLongCut
How, as a Libertarian, can you believe in a New World Order?a reply to: Gnawledge

Yes because it is either that or anarchy.

I'm not claiming to know what the New World Order is (conspiracies aside). But there has to be a solution to the worldwide problems we face while maintaining a right to our own liberties.

It's either a NWO or Anarchy? I think you skipped the Constitutional Republic part and went straight to chaos reply to: Gnawledge

originally posted by: CopeLongCut
It's either a NWO or Anarchy? I think you skipped the Constitutional Republic part and went straight to chaos reply to: Gnawledge

Again New World Order is so intertwined with conspiracy nonsense. Our constitutional Republic here in the U.S. is broken. That is evident to me. It is broken not because of Trump or Dems or Reps but because our world has changed.

I don't want anarchy. I want order with individual rights. This has to be global because we are a global society. Like it or not. We cannot exist alone.

a reply to: worldstarcountry

And I'm starting to wonder where the hell the smallpox vaccine came in to this conversation.

Emotional much?