It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Kid shoots cops with handgun, Biden wants to ban Assault Weapons

page: 1
28
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+15 more 
posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 05:01 AM
link   
www.foxnews.com...


“Weapons of war have no place in our communities,” the former Vice President tweeted. “We need to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.”

Earlier Biden had called the shooting “unconscionable” and for the suspect to be brought to justice. He also said anyone who commits an act of violence “should be caught and punished.”


So Joe thinks that by taking "Assault Weapons" away, somehow, killings will stop.

But at least Joe is interested in punishing those who are caught doing violent things. I suppose as long as they aren't in Portland burning a few buildings. Those guys are fine people and should be let go.




posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 05:38 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

... and Granola is a type of breakfast cereal.



These things are not as related to each other as the spin would attempt to portray.

Imagine what would happen, though, if the "attempted assassination" was done with a weapon with more killing power.

edit on 14/9/2020 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 05:40 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Pretty good examples of non sequiturs by both of you.


+10 more 
posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 05:50 AM
link   
Record gun sales [ many of them first time buyers ] since the Dem supported violence started and Joe wants to ban weapons.


What an idiot.



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 06:17 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

No way, if we continue to punish law abiding citizens for the cowardly
acts of street criminals. America loses all the way around. First of all
law abiding citizens have a right to the same weapon that this country
can strap to their ass at 18 yrs old. And send them out to a foreign land
to die for their country. And it should be unheard of to even consider
changing that in America. Unless the goal is more heart ache blood shed
and misery.

Banning anything that gives a man the best means to protect his family.
Is unlawful and a completely absurd notion at any capacity. Take away
a mans ability to do that which makes him a man and might as well
take away the man himself. And I just touched on the true goal of the
democratic party right there. So there's that! The true goal of the democrats.
You don't have to put your glasses on to find it. It's the criminals who should
lose their rights not everyone. Democrats wouldn't even stop there anyway.
They'd be try'n to ban the military's weapons after they took ours.

F%^$*(& Idiots


edit on 14-9-2020 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 06:39 AM
link   
The bigger problem is Joe can't be asked real unscripted questions on any topic and the high capacity bs of his staff.



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 06:48 AM
link   
a reply to: DAVID64




Record gun sales [ many of them first time buyers ] since the Dem supported violence started and Joe wants to ban weapons.

Just bought my daughter a glock 9mm her first and she took right
to it. lol



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 07:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

... and Granola is a type of breakfast cereal.



These things are not as related to each other as the spin would attempt to portray.

Imagine what would happen, though, if the "attempted assassination" was done with a weapon with more killing power.


Um, a gun was used. AFAIK, guns are what produces "killing power". But the type of gun was used to conceal itself until the shooter was ready. If the shooter had a big scary black rifle, he would have been seen approaching and likely not able to do the damage he did.

I just don't get why attacking assault weapons over this event is even a thing. The problem here is a thug who doesn't value human life. We should remove that.



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 07:18 AM
link   
Can someone define "assault weapon" for me?

I've asked many libs, and never recieved a clear answer.



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 07:22 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

I'm glad Biden wants to make acts of violence illegal.

Maybe then, acts of violence will stop.



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 07:40 AM
link   
Of course, we all know that most police are shot by legal gun owners...amiright?

Police are never shot by street thugs, gangs, crazy people using stolen guns, nope never happens.



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: DAVID64


Record gun sales [ many of them first time buyers ] since the Dem supported violence started and Joe wants to ban weapons.


What an idiot.

Not so idiotic maybe...

If I were a conspiracy-minded individual posting on a conspiracy website, I might come to the conclusion that the push for weapons confiscation would be much more profitable if more weapons were confiscated. After all, no weapon confiscation program reimburses gun owners anywhere close to the actual vale (purchasing cost) of their firearms. It appears from reports I have seen where this has been attempted that the reimbursement is actually generous at 10% of the cost.

Such an individual might also remember there is an operation in the ATF called Project Gunrunner where guns are sold to criminal organizations with the expressed intent to track them (an intent that frequently seems to fail). So it would appear that the fastest way to get more guns to sell to foreign cartels would be to have more guns available to confiscate buy back. More guns mean more profit from such operations, especially since banning firearms would limit competition at the same time.

There may well be a madness behind this method...er... method behind this madness.

TheRedneck



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 07:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Mach2
Defining "assault weapon"
Word begins with "ass" - you'd really have to be one to use it!
Carry on.

ganjoa




posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 08:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Mach2


Can someone define "assault weapon" for me?

Assault Weapon (ass-ault' wea'-pon) - noun
    A classification of firearms which includes whatever type of firearm is deemed most detrimental to society in the sole opinion of the Democratic National Committee. This classification is subject to change as such change is determined by the Democratic National Committee to be necessary.

TheRedneck



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 08:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Mach2
Can someone define "assault weapon" for me?


Must be:
  • Black
  • Scary
  • Have a chainsaw mounting lug



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 08:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

... and Granola is a type of breakfast cereal.



These things are not as related to each other as the spin would attempt to portray.

Imagine what would happen, though, if the "attempted assassination" was done with a weapon with more killing power.

My fists literally can be deemed assault weapons. So when assault weapons are banned to I have to cut off my hands?



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 08:24 AM
link   
I wore underwear when I was in the military.

So are my boxers now "undergarments of war"?



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 08:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I wore underwear when I was in the military.

So are my boxers now "undergarments of war"?

YOUR underwear?

We are talking chemical weapons now



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 08:25 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yes. Knowing you we could drop them on Iran and be accused of a chemical weapons attack.



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 08:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yes. Knowing you we could drop them on Iran and be accused of a chemical weapons attack.

great minds think a like, mine is just a few milliseconds faster




top topics



 
28
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join