It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Rally Sept-13-2020 Las Vegas - Masks Aweigh

page: 3
22
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 07:42 AM
link   
a reply to: ManFromEurope

That story was debunked and showed to be all bullsheist 😃




posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 07:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
To all who "bet that it (number of COVID patients in ICU) won't increase:

You take part in a party, you get the virus "Results Are In: Sturgis Motorcycle Rally Was A COVID 'Super Spreader' Costing Billions"

The numbers are rising days after every careless major event.


Amazingly, not one single COVID case from BLM and antifa riots ever day for the past 3 months.



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 07:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
a reply to: xuenchen

Just said that "we have Obama cold for spying on my campaign....let's see what happens". Come onnn just arrest him if you've got him cold!


They don't have anything....we never go after these guys. Ever.

Face it



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 08:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
To all who "bet that it (number of COVID patients in ICU) won't increase:

You take part in a party, you get the virus "Results Are In: Sturgis Motorcycle Rally Was A COVID 'Super Spreader' Costing Billions"

The numbers are rising days after every careless major event.


here ya, first from one of the lefty's favorite,




Jennifer Beam Dowd, the deputy director of the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science at the University of Oxford, also took issue with the paper’s conclusion in an article published on Slate. Generally speaking, Dowd argued that the researchers made assumptions that don’t always play out in reality. More specifically, Dowd took issue with how the study confidently presented a precise conclusion (266,796 COVID-cases) despite noisy results.
Was Sturgis Motorcycle Rally Responsible for 250K Coronavirus Cases?





The Sturgis study essentially tries to re-create a randomized experiment by comparing the COVID-19 trends in counties that rallygoers traveled from with counties that apparently don’t have as many motorcycle enthusiasts. The authors estimate the source of inflow into Sturgis during the rally based on the “home” location of nonresident cellphone pings. They use a “difference-in-difference” approach, calculating whether the change in case trends for a county that sent many people to Sturgis was larger compared with a county that sent none. They looked at how cumulative case numbers changed between June 6 and Sept. 2.
The Sturgis Biker Rally Did Not Cause 266,796 Cases of COVID-19


there are others that take a dump on that little alarmist study.



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 08:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: ManFromEurope

That story was debunked and showed to be all bullsheist 😃


edit: am reading right now.
edit on 14 9 2020 by ManFromEurope because: (no reason given)


edit2: Okay, I have read the Slate-article right now. My main critic on this article: it denies the influence of super-spreaders. Right now we have a very localized, both in time and location, case of a super-spreader in southern Germany Some source with relevant key words, haven't read it actually, ask questions if necessary, which was quite an active spreading event by one single person going out to town.

So this is not a counter-argument against the super-spreader-effect in Sturgis, in my opinion. Slate offers only opinions and questions, too.
edit on 14 9 2020 by ManFromEurope because: (no reason given)


edit 3: "None of this means that the rally was probably harmless. Common sense would tell us that such a large event with close contact was risky and did increase transmission. The paper’s estimates for the rise in cases in Meade County, South Dakota, the site of the rally, reports a more plausible increase of between 177 and 195 cases, consistent with raw data." That is the only consistent data we all might agree about. Nevertheless, there was a super-spreading event.
edit on 14 9 2020 by ManFromEurope because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2020 @ 09:36 AM
link   
a reply to: ManFromEurope

I'll wait for the 2 hour limit for you to edit before commenting 😃

Wouldn't want to change your mind or anything 😃



new topics

top topics
 
22
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join