I'm a bit amiss on how to start, because my words will be picked apart no matter my strategy. Due to this, I am going to write to you as much in my
flow of thought as possible (with minimal revision for clarity purposes). One may fabricate an intention of mine to lie, although my words today will
be of truth. Just two weeks ago, I found that what I had been studying was connected with the Bible.
For a little bit of background, I have been a lifelong Christian. For my just over 40 years of existence, my education has been mostly in the
Lutheran teachings of Christianity. The internet has allowed me to diversify that knowledge a little bit, although I can not even claim to be an
expert on Christianity. Like many, I have found myself to feel disenfranchised from where modern Church has gone. There were my personal experiences
which had me withdraw. The Temple was always within me, and so my faith was never far from my side.
As the main person in my family who was interested in genealogy, I was able to explore a new kind of history with DNA. Do not think that I am
promoting something based on Ancestry DNA, because I actually think that it is misused and shouldn't even promote percentages. That is another case,
because my test of choice is haplogroup science. We are able to tell much about a male line and a female line from the different type of testing (
y-dna and mitochondrial). This is the subject that I found myself studying for years, which I did not expect to be presenting today.
This is a topic that I have discussed before here on ATS, as it has always intrigued me. This post is from 2015 Titled "Ethiopia, Sumerians, Nimrod,
Ark of Covenant, Hitler, Berghof, Lost Tribes Connected?"
Here is me proposing that we are looking at the genealogy of the Annunaki Jan 2018 titled: "Genetic Genealogy - Scientific Proof that Egyptians are
descendants of Annunaki Alien Race?"
Here is a connected post, Titled "Orion = Towards Center of Universe ?"
What I have found absolutely boggles me. I started this from a standpoint of following this mutation that only two lines of men have. You can follow
any y-dna phylogenetic chart, and see what I am talking about. There has always been an anomaly of the D and E man. When viewing modern man (A and B
are considered ancient), we see that modern man was split into two groups at this CT point. Because one group got a mutation while the other did not,
I have taken to calling this the "CT event".
The D and E haplogroups gain the YAP+ mutation, and no other man has this. The line that did not get the mutation then seems to diversify into 15 new
haplogroups, becoming the modern diversity of man. At very least, I have always been able intrigued to study it from the viewpoint of possible
anti-mutagenic or epigenetic properties. Researchers estimate the CT event to be around 50,000 years ago. Since then, the D and E haplogroups have
stood as candlesticks beside the Lord.
Chabad talks about this exact mutation, and notates that over 98% of Kohenim tested display this YAP+ marker. They never put it together with the
knowledge that it is only on two haplogroups in the entire world. This absolutely rules out R and J haplogroup Kohenim. It would be easy to assign
an intent with malice when looking at this, but I would like to present some possibilities.
Some of the men might be in the Cohen position due to adoption or adultery. Others might have stepped in to take the role, while the temple was in
upheaval. Some might have just made a mistake. When dealing with power structures, it is also wise to assume that others willingly chose the
incorrect position so that they could spread evil. Regardless the reason or intent, this is a genetic renewal.
Just two weeks ago Sunday was the first time when I felt as though the Bible spoke to me. It was through it's Word, but I felt as though I had a bit
more understanding. This came from the addition of a 1 Kings verse which listed the two names upon the Pillars outside Solomon's Temple. They were
Boaz and Japhini. This combined with my prior knowledge was the last bit that I needed.
Verses said that the Two Witnesses would be of the lands of Samaria, and Judeah. My first roadblock was tackling the Revelation 11 verse which
details the Two Witnesses. My intuition led me to connect this verse with the 7 Stars over the 7 Candlesticks, which are the 7 Angels of the Church
over the 7 Churches. Reading Rev 11 surely sounded as if they were describing the Kohenim, as it detailed the golden pipes from which flows the
golden oil, the anointed ones. To me this references the Kohenim, as they were the only ones who prepared and received the anointing oils. This is
with the idea presented in the Book of Jubilees that Nimrod is the ancestor of all Hebrews.
The Kohenim not only make the anointing oils, but they also are the ones who receive this oil. So, this felt like Kohenim but there needed to be
verification in the Word. This is where I turned to Rev 2 and 3 to attempt to understand the Churches. Knowing that there are Two Witnesses, it is
quite simple to tell that the Church of Philadelphia, the House of David would stand as one of the Candlesticks. The other two would be between
Smyrna and Thyatira. Like usual, I find the Bible presents something clearly, with a layer of veil which needs interpretation behind it. Here is
where I have heard some researchers suggest that Smyrna is the second of the Two Witnesses. I could not disagree with that assertion more.
The Church of Smyrna is the synagogue of Satan, and it is easily provable. It is likely because of the similarity to the House of David's Verse in
Rev 3 that people latch onto Smyrna in Rev 2. My thought is that the similarity is to draw attention, but for the inverse reason. This is the type
of verification that I expect from the Bible, as Verses are usually used in nearly identical ways to suggest that they should reference each other (at
least this is how I have always found it). Here is where I looked at the victory given to the Church of Smyrna. They are given life. Wow, that
surely sounds like a consolation prize when compared to the splendors given to the House of David. That alone suggest that it is not a Candlestick,
but there is more to show against Smyrna.
With a lackluster victory, we can dive into the Verse differences between Rev 2 and Rev 3 a little deeper. Revelation 2 "I know the blasphemy of
them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan" versus Revelation 3 "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan,
which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."
To me Rev 2 says I know of the fake Jews, the synagogue of Satan, where Rev 3 says "I know of the OTHERS who are the fake Jews, the synagogue of
Satan. This seems to be an accusation of Smyrna, which is strongs 4666 (myrrh) -"of foreign origin".
The Church of Smyrna is Joanna. She is the House of Ionna. She married Herod's Servant, Chuza, and her people are the Canaanites.