It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

1,000 cases of double voting in Georgia expected to be prosecuted

page: 2
20
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 11:57 AM
link   
well....it has certainly been posted on THIS here site over and over that it is the democrats that will cheat......I looked up the stats just to see and was a little surprised that it wasn't overwhelmingly democrats like the trump supporters like to post here.

I think it will be a mix of voters...republicans equate democrat with socialism they are TERRIFIED ... if t comes down to a choice of cheating or letting the country become socialist (according to their way of thinking) they will do (as posted right on this site) whatever it takes.....I do think that includes cheating

now here is what we need to consider...how many will be caught?? well they just caught 1000 who double voted in those 2 states.....so many cheaters do get caught

as I posted before if you mail in your ballot and then go down later to your polling place and vote..you will not have a ballot...they give you the special provisional ballot it has a different color envelope and goes in a separate container.

your name and address is supposed to be in the book...where you sign it...if not you sign your name in the very back page of the book which will be checked later to verify you are legit

a few checks and balances in place.......no system is perfect




originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: research100
for all you trumpers claiming it is all/only democrats that will cheat..well looks like in those 2 states the per cent was 60% democrats (600) and 40% (400) republicans double voting

a reply to: research100



I don't think that anybody claimed thay it's only Democrats who do it. Stupidity is a universal human trait.

However, in this presidential election cycle it is undeniable the Democrats are the ones pushing for an unsecured and insecureable mail-in process and that they are the ones who have the most to gain from it. It is already being played as a tool to contest the election and they are clearly explaining their strategy, how and when they intend to do it.




posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 12:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: 727Sky
You would think with all the years of experience with elections, a supposedly modern country, would have by now figured out how to run a legal fair election. Maybe that has not been the intention all along ? At least in this case those who thought they could scam the system have been identified and if the prosecutor is to be believed about a 1000 folks will be facing some legal difficulties.

There is nothing IMO about any republic or a country who votes for local officials more important than insuring all legal votes are counted and the people who try to scam the system face harsh punishments as they steal from the society they claim to belong to. Looks like a start of a happy ending at least in this case.


as today the states of Georgia and North Carolina are being revealed as having double voters involving about 30,000 cases involving the 2016 Election all the way up to the 2020 Primaries. Now during this reveal where there are 30,000 cases of voters voting twice in the 2016 and 2018 midterms in North Carolina and Georgia, we are now finding out there are 1,000 voters who voted twice in Georgia's June Primaries for the 2020 General Election...And it looks like Georgia's Secretary of State is going to prosecute all these cases.


www.puppetstringnews.com...


So, in other words these voters may have already committed the illegal acts that Trump advised the other day when he said:

"So let them send it in and let them go vote, and if their system's as good as they say it is, then obviously they won't be able to vote. If it isn't tabulated, they'll be able to vote," Trump said when asked whether he has confidence in the mail-in system in North Carolina, a battleground state.

"If it's as good as they say it is, then obviously they won't be able to vote. If it isn't tabulated, they'll be able to vote. So that's the way it is. And that's what they should do," ...

www.nbcnews.com...


I expected someone of your age would be able to tell that what he said was based on his very loose understanding of how provisional ballots work. If he were asked directly "do you want people casting two votes for their candidate" my guess is his answer would be a resounding "No". The context for his statement was the USPS stating they may not be able to deliver mail-in ballots on time. So what he said was based on something like this:

USPS Official: We may not be able to deliver mail-in ballots on time to be counted.

Trump: If you mailed in your vote, go to the poll on election day. Ask them if your voted had been received. If not, ask for a provisional ballot and cast your vote. If they find your mail-in ballot then your vote will only be counted once.

Could he have said it a much better way? Of course. Did he say he wants people to vote twice? Not in the way you're interpreting it.



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 01:35 PM
link   
a reply to: 727Sky

They should be prosecuted.

But so should any politicians who suggest, or arrange, that people should double vote.



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 01:43 PM
link   
a reply to: research100

Prosecute both.



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stupidsecrets
a reply to: incoserv

Unethical and criminal methods are justified if it achieves one positive outcome; removing Trump. End justifies the means. This is the stance taken by Democrat leadership. Everyone knows this is what is going on. Most of the media is onboard with it as well. The public is going to have to call it though. Do we want accept these moral bankrupt methods or do we vote against it and question them. I hope they don't accept them because if they do we are doomed. Once the election integrity is compromised on this level it's over with.


This thread and my response set me to thinking and I address this in a post with the title A Whirlpool in the Swamp. Have a look and let me know what you think.



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 02:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: research100
for all you trumpers claiming it is all/only democrats that will cheat..well looks like in those 2 states the per cent was 60% democrats (600) and 40% (400) republicans double voting

a reply to: research100



Aren't those States majority Republican?



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: research100

And that’s nice. I think the main argument is that voter fraud does exist. I’m glad you agree.



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: 727Sky

They should be prosecuted.

But so should any politicians who suggest, or arrange, that people should double vote.



Uh, you thought he told people to drink Clorox, too ... Didn't you?



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 03:40 PM
link   
I believe there are still some primary races not settled in the state of New York, because mail-in voting created so much havoc.



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 04:00 PM
link   
a reply to: 727Sky

Just empty rhetoric.

From Forbes:


KEY FACTS


A total of roughly 150,000 people who requested absentee ballots showed up at polling places on election day often because they had not received their absentee ballots in the mail or decided to instead vote in person, according to Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Approximately 1,000 voters returned absentee ballots and then also showed up to vote on election day, Raffensperger announced Tuesday.

Raffensperger also claimed, without evidence, that those 1,000 individuals intentionally cast two votes, fully aware that they had already submitted an absentee ballot.

"A double voter knows exactly what they're doing, diluting the votes of each and every voter that follows the law," Raffensperger declared. "Those that make the choice to game the system are breaking the law. And as secretary of state, I will not tolerate it."

According to the Associated Press, when Raffensperger was asked to present proof, he didn't provide any evidence of voter intent, other than mentioning one voter in Long County who he said bragged about voting twice.


www.forbes.com...

Are you paid to spread this stuff?



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 04:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: 727Sky

They should be prosecuted.

But so should any politicians who suggest, or arrange, that people should double vote.



Uh, you thought he told people to drink Clorox, too ... Didn't you?


He basically did. I mean, if you are to damn stupid to understand the difference between a question and a statement, then sure he did. By asking "could we do that", he was basically saying " you need to do that". Sure it takes some mental masturbation coupled with an amazing lack of brain cells, but it can be done. I assure you it can be done.
edit on 10-9-2020 by network dude because: where the hell is my beer?



posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 05:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: 727Sky

They should be prosecuted.

But so should any politicians who suggest, or arrange, that people should double vote.



Uh, you thought he told people to drink Clorox, too ... Didn't you?



Not at all.




posted on Sep, 10 2020 @ 08:09 PM
link   
How many missing people are listed now?...Millions?.
Missing people dont vote do they?

Someone better cross-reference and make sure millions of missing persons arent somehow voting.



posted on Sep, 11 2020 @ 07:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: research100
if you mail in your ballot then later go to the polls to vote...you have no voting ballot they give you what is called a "provisional ballot" the envelope is a different color and it goes in a separate container.....also the book where we have your names that you sign..if your name is NOT listed you sign your name in the very last page in the back of the book...that way they can compare your signature with the signature on record and/or they determine you already voted or some mistake was made



originally posted by: BomSquad
If you don't positively identify someone who is voting, or requesting a mail in vote, how do you maintain the integrity of the vote? How do you prosecute when you can't prove they did the voting in the first place?


I've never had to sign to be able to vote. In my precinct (and all other precincts that I have voted in my state) I walk up to a table, they ask for my address, they look me up in a book and then ask me my name. After they find my address and name, they hand me a ballot and check off a box next to my name and address. That's it. No ID, no proof of actually residing at that address. I don't even have to sign for the ballot. I just take the ballot, go to the booth, check off what I want and then put it in the electronic vote counting machine.

Also, a couple of elections ago, my wife went to vote and was informed that she had already voted. She had not. She was given a provisional ballot and allowed to vote, but we are pretty sure that provisional ballot was never counted (only by intuition, we don't have proof of it not counting)
edit on 11-9-2020 by BomSquad because: added an anecdote



posted on Sep, 11 2020 @ 12:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: 727Sky

They should be prosecuted.

But so should any politicians who suggest, or arrange, that people should double vote.

Absolutely... good thing Trump didn't do that, eh?




top topics



 
20
<< 1   >>

log in

join